Skip to comments.We Are All in It Together, Clinton Says [Shared Prosperity Should Replace "On Your Own' Society"]
Posted on 05/29/2007 9:13:29 AM PDT by HarmlessLovableFuzzball
click here to read article
Here it comes..... State owned business. State owned public utilities, etc.
Why isn’t this woman in jail with all the criminal activity she has done and don’t tell me no one can prove it. I bet they can.
THEY BOTH MEAN -—INCOME REDISTRIBUTION!!!!!! Is this the America we are going to get when the queen takes control HELL NO!!!!!!! THIS IS THE ENEMY FROM WITHIN!!!
“If I may be so impolite: will Her Highness and her husband offer their share to make this egalitarian society they want successful?”
Hell no.... And they won’t help the people that helped them either. Imagine living in a country where you have dictator that has absolute power over you? I think the people that used to help her(apparently the list is growing)are realizing with her in power; she will eventually turn on them too.
God Bless America and Keep Her Strong
I am certain I read this before by other authors, Engels and Karl Marx! I do hope that Hillary is the Democrat nominee. She is giving us quote after quote that define her as the hard leftist socialist she is. She will not be that hard to defeat.
A redistribution of my wealth, your wealth all for Americans, err, illegals, whoever, who will not work or will not achieve what they might. All in the name of collectivism and an attack on free enterprise capitalism. This , of course, goes along with Americans who do not believe in competition or excellent work. Unfortunately, there are many now approaching 50% who want the Govt. to carry them from the cradle to the grave. And this is not even Europe!
Maybe she’ll share her cattle futures proceeds with us.
Both need to be read - great posts on both!
And there is another % who demand it is our moral responsiblity to carry them! Our responsiblity to carry someone who won't carry themselves...
Yes, I had a frightening conversation with someone of this thought process. She strongly believes we must carry them, no matter what. It is not their fault they need to be carried their entire lifetime.
LOL. Sharing my prosperity with others. That's my job. Not hers.
I'm with her on eliminating corporate giveaways as long as we also eliminate transfer payments from taxpayers to individuals. We would be a better, stronger, and happier society if government abandoned the role of moving money from one person to another.
It'll never happen. We have moved irrevocably across that line. I think it likely that there is no longer a political solution to America's fundamental structural problems. The structure is now the problem.
I have slowly come to the conclusion that over time, it does not matter who we elect because the structure produces the same solution--more government, more control of the population, less free speech, and more power in the elites.
Of course, back on topic, HRC has no intention of eliminating corporate giveaways in any event. She trades them for campaign contributions.
Good grief! Can anyone say COMMUNISM???
I saw several news clips of this. OMG—shared? Hillary’s idea of shared means she is coming for the rich’s wallet (that is you and me per Dem definition) and will redistribute to the “poor”—that includes 20 million illegals and their families, which makers it 50 million Mexicans before you start counting.
They really do believe we are stupid.
Amazing; So we have to build our future on the backs of illiterate, farm pickers, or criminals, or ones who have no skilled mentalities or professions? Is this nuts? Bush, McCain , Kennedy are both just out of their minds on this . Legal immigrants should have skills that aid their new nation . This influx will bankrupt us and frankly will destroy the American culture.