Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nonsporting

Just a question ... since stopping power is in part a function of energy delivered to the target, is it possible to get better results by just creating a heavier 5.56 round?


27 posted on 05/30/2007 8:06:53 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb
is it possible to get better results by just creating a heavier 5.56 round?

The cartridge has reached it's limit (especially in shorter barrels) with the 77 grain ammunition issued to the SDM's. Anything heavier can't be accelerated quickly enough through a short tube.

The projectiles will also be at the limits of spin-stabilization out of a 1:7 barrel. As a heavier bullet gets longer, more spin is required to keep it stable. It's been a while since I did the math but I believe the heavy bullets are turning something a bit over 300,000 rpm.

There are quite a few good bullet / cartridge combinations in the 6.5 - 6.8 mm range that could be made to work on the same platform. However, I doubt that the average soldier could make use of the extra horsepower.

56 posted on 05/30/2007 9:21:24 AM PDT by NY.SS-Bar9 (DR #1692)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: r9etb
Just a question ... since stopping power is in part a function of energy delivered to the target, is it possible to get better results by just creating a heavier 5.56 round?

Snipers who use an M16/AR15 platform use 77gr Sierra HPBT's (this is 15gr heavier than M855 (62gr), a 24% increase in weight and a thinner jacketted "match" bullet).

61 posted on 05/30/2007 9:52:09 AM PDT by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson