Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney Beginning to Look Like GOP Front-Runner
Deseret News ^ | 5/27/07 | Steven Thomma

Posted on 05/30/2007 7:19:37 AM PDT by Reaganesque

WASHINGTON — Just a few weeks ago, advisers to Mitt Romney spoke about a steady, gradual climb from obscurity to the 2008 Republican presidential nomination. Mitt Romney, speaking in Lakeland, Fla., Thursday, appears to have momentum on his side among GOP presidential contenders.

Now, Romney has rocketed from behind and is leading the race or is neck and neck for the lead in the pivotal states of Iowa and New Hampshire.

The road to next January's voting still is marked by numerous potholes, including persistent charges that he's a flip-flopper without conviction, a Mormon faith still unfamiliar and perhaps suspect to some voters as well as potential new competition from former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and former Sen. Fred Thompson.

Also, his rapid rise may say as much about the fickleness of Republicans this early in the campaign as it does about the former Massachusetts governor.

But for now at least, Romney enters the summer astride the top tier and within reach of being able to claim that he's the front-runner for the nomination.

"He clearly has the three M's: media, money and momentum," independent pollster John Zogby said.

Romney led the field in fund raising in the first three months of this year. Yet until now, he trailed in popularity well behind Rudy Giuliani and Arizona Sen. John McCain in most polls, either nationally or in early voting states such as Iowa, New Hampshire or South Carolina.

However, a poll in Iowa by The Des Moines Register last week found Romney leaping ahead with the support of 30 percent of likely attendees at January's precinct caucuses, well ahead of McCain's 18 percent and Giuliani's 17 percent.

In another new Iowa survey by the Republican public relations firm Strategic Vision, Romney led with 20 percent, up sharply from 8 percent the month before. He was followed by Giuliani with 18 percent and McCain with 16 percent. (A third poll showed McCain with 18 percent, Giuliani with 17 percent and Romney with 16 percent.)

Romney surged in New Hampshire as well. A new Zogby poll there found he had the support of 35 percent of likely primary voters, up from 25 percent the month before. That was well ahead of Giuliani and McCain, each with 19 percent.

Analysts and insiders pointed to three reasons for the Romney rise:

• Good reviews from party members and pundits for his performance in the party's first debate, May 3 in California.

• Unusually early television advertising in Iowa and New Hampshire. Romney has been advertising there for weeks, boasting about his record as a business executive and governor. A new ad Thursday bragged that he cut spending and taxes as governor and "enforced immigration laws, stood up for traditional marriage and the sanctity of human life."

• His rivals are in trouble with the party's conservative base. Giuliani's support for abortion rights was highlighted in the first two debates, a problem in a party that still opposes abortion rights. McCain stood with Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., on an immigration bill widely reviled by conservatives as amnesty for illegal immigrants.

Romney's criticism of the immigration proposal — which is similar to one he supported a year ago — drew a sharp rebuke from McCain.

That, conservative strategist Greg Mueller said, was a mistake that helped elevate Romney as THE conservative critic of the unpopular proposal among the presidential candidates. "The McCain attack is the best thing that's happened to Romney since the day he got in," Mueller said.

He still faces formidable obstacles.

Foremost is the charge that he's a campaign convert to conservatism after running as a more moderate or liberal candidate in Massachusetts. Notably, he supported abortion rights when he ran for the Senate against Kennedy in 1994 and now opposes them.

"That could be his Achilles' heel," said David Johnson of Strategic Vision, which found in its new poll that Romney loses 4 percentage points of his support when voters are reminded that he supported abortion rights and gay rights in the 1990s.

"That's the one reluctance about Mitt Romney among conservatives," Johnson said. "They don't know if he's a true conservative."

The other potential challenge is his Mormon faith. In Iowa, the recent Register poll found that 1 out of 5 Republicans said they were less likely to vote for Romney because of his faith. But Mueller suggested that social conservatives eventually would care more about what Romney would do in the Oval Office than what he would do in church.

"Is there an undercurrent out there nervous about the Mormon thing? Sure. But they really want to know where he stands on the issues they care about," Mueller said.

Romney's campaign aides say he can answer the flip-flop questions by pointing to his record as governor.

"The only position he's ever changed is on life, and he changed in the right direction," Romney's campaign spokesman Kevin Madden said. "It was a matter of him recognizing he was wrong in the past and now he's right on the issue."

Madden also said that Romney's faith faded as an issue when people met the candidate and realized that he "shares the same hopes and aspirations that Americans of many faiths do."

In the end, those close to Romney tamp down any talk of his being the front-runner, perhaps fearful of raising expectations too high and setting him up for a fall if and when the polls in those early states change again.

"It's still fluid. I expect they will change," Madden said.

But he said the key to Romney's success of recent weeks and his hopes for the coming months were the same: that people get to know him and his record — and that they like him.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: polls; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-168 next last
Things could get even more interesting if, as is reported, Fred Thompson joins the race. This would be the first time in a long time that I've liked more than one candidate in the primaries. Of course, my loyalty is to Mitt however, Fred would be a great alternative. Mitt's been building some momentum over the past couple of weeks so, we'll see what kind of an affect Fred Thompson entering the race will have on that. This could be very interesting!
1 posted on 05/30/2007 7:19:39 AM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776; bcbuster; bethtopaz; Bluestateredman; brivette; bruinbirdman; Capt. Cox; ...
Mitt Ping!


• Send FReep Mail to Unmarked Package to get [ON] or [OFF] the Mitt Romney Ping List


2 posted on 05/30/2007 7:21:23 AM PDT by Reaganesque (Romney 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
He will be if Fred Thompson decides not to run, however the breaking news in the last few hours is that Fred Thompson is running for sure and he will announce his candidacy on July 4th.

Thompson-Mitt is still a great ticket :)

PS: Another great picture of the Governor :)

3 posted on 05/30/2007 7:24:27 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

>> The other potential challenge is his Mormon faith.

The Constitution prohibits a religious test for office...but the MSM are going to do their very best to insert the test themselves into the campaign, and keep it alive by constantly hammering it. I think it will backfire, though.


4 posted on 05/30/2007 7:27:15 AM PDT by Nervous Tick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Let’s get ready to RUUUUMMMMMMBBBBBBBLEEEE!

While I personally like Mitt, I think a good fight will improve our chances for ‘08. I eagerily await Fred’s entrance into the race. I also hear that Tom Coburn wants to get in the race too. He would be a great choice too.


5 posted on 05/30/2007 7:27:18 AM PDT by nowandlater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

I could support Romney. Also Giuliani. Not McCain.

Obviously Thompson would be better, but I think he’s waited too long. He may be looking to garner the VP spot.

Romney/Thompson would be a good choice. Or vice versa.

I am worried about their chances of beating Hillary, though. I think Giuliani has the best chance of beating Hillary.


6 posted on 05/30/2007 7:27:26 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

7 posted on 05/30/2007 7:29:00 AM PDT by mirkwood (NO AMNESTY!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
The Constitution prohibits a religious test for office...

It does not prohibit it from being a campaign issue brought up by other candidates or voters.

8 posted on 05/30/2007 7:31:57 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Rudy might be able to take New York.

Other than that the red/blue makeup of the Electoral Vote will be likely quite close to what it has been everywhere else in recent years if he is up against The Beast.

Might as well face it, we are going to get that Shrew in 2008.

9 posted on 05/30/2007 7:33:52 AM PDT by Radix ( Honey, I shrunk our Carbon Footprint.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

I don’t agree about Rudy being able to beat hillary. He’s not that good a debater. He had problems running against her for Senator. I think she would use her smear skills to wipe the floor with him. It’s going to take a skilled communicator who can think “on the spot” and be so well informed they can come back at her point by point. Rudy is too emotional.


10 posted on 05/30/2007 7:35:53 AM PDT by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WVNan

Sorry, I have to post and run. Story of my life.


11 posted on 05/30/2007 7:37:57 AM PDT by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

So, what are Romney’s positions this week again?

What time is it, they may have changed again.

What will his positions be after he’s elected?


12 posted on 05/30/2007 7:38:24 AM PDT by JayHawk Phrenzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Radix

I think that Rudy could win here in Florida against Hillary. He’s probably the only one, though. There are a lot of NY retirees down here. If the GOP can’t win Florida, then they can’t win. Hillary will most likely take all of the states that Kerry took, plus Ohio.


13 posted on 05/30/2007 7:39:06 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

>> The other potential challenge is his Mormon faith.

“The Constitution prohibits a religious test for office...”

No it doesn’t, it denies the establishment of a state religion. There is nothing in the Constitution precluding voters from taking into account the religious beliefs of a candidate.

“but the MSM are going to do their very best to insert the test themselves into the campaign, and keep it alive by constantly hammering it.”

Not only the MSM, but also sincere people who believe Mormonism has tenets that cause high office holders to become unstable choices.

“I think it will backfire, though.”

If 10% of Christian voters walk away, kiss the election goodbye. But feel free to vote for Romney, just don’t be surprised when the next ten years are sucked up debating seer stones, polygamy, celestial wives, secret handshakes, Temple rites, sealings, Indians as Jews (Lamanites and Nephites), and whether Bishop Mitt is a Holder of the Melchizedek priesthood. You think Skull and Crossbones was bad, you ain’t seen nothing yet.


14 posted on 05/30/2007 7:41:18 AM PDT by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Always Right; Nervous Tick
"The Constitution prohibits a religious test for office..."

It does not prohibit it from being a campaign issue brought up by other candidates or voters.

No, it does not. The Constitution does not presume to govern the darker recesses of the human soul.

It is up to us to reject such bigotry ourselves.

15 posted on 05/30/2007 7:41:19 AM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WVNan

“He had problems running against her for Senator.”

I don’t think Rudy ran against Hillary for Senate. You’re thinking of someone else, probably Rick Lazio.


16 posted on 05/30/2007 7:42:11 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
I think that Rudy could win here in Florida against Hillary. He’s probably the only one, though. There are a lot of NY retirees down here.

All the more reason why he can't win Florida - people forget how unpopular Rudy was in New York before 9/11.

17 posted on 05/30/2007 7:42:19 AM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Yes he did, until he backed out a few months before the election, due to his “prostate cancer”


18 posted on 05/30/2007 7:44:17 AM PDT by NYC Republican (Conservatives' Biggest Problem- Single Issue Voters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: highball

A lot of Freepers say that, but he’s the only candidate who’s got the edge on Hillary in the Florida polls. If he’s so unpopular among NYers, then why do they support him?


19 posted on 05/30/2007 7:44:23 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Radix

Might as well face it, we are going to get that Shrew in 2008.
*******************************************

No we won’t. Most dems I know, and who also voted for Kerry, can’t stand her. Rudy or Romney likely would beat her, and I think, fairly easily.

Thompson, on the other hand, will demolish her like Nixon v McGovern, and Reagan v Carter/Mondale.


20 posted on 05/30/2007 7:44:28 AM PDT by HerrBlucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Radix

NO GOP candidate will be competitive in NY. Not even Rudy, Hillary would wipe the floor with him


21 posted on 05/30/2007 7:45:35 AM PDT by NYC Republican (Conservatives' Biggest Problem- Single Issue Voters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican

He never debated her, though, and I don’t think that his candidacy was even made official. He was mulling it over.


22 posted on 05/30/2007 7:46:41 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant; WVNan
I don’t think Rudy ran against Hillary for Senate. You’re thinking of someone else, probably Rick Lazio.

Rudy saw the writing on the wall, so he bowed out of the race early, for "health reasons."

23 posted on 05/30/2007 7:48:31 AM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

I think a Romney/Thompson (or vice-versa) would wipe the floor with Hillary.


24 posted on 05/30/2007 7:48:44 AM PDT by Reaganesque (Romney 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

A Mitt vs. Fred primary works for me. I couldn’t get too upset by the outcome


25 posted on 05/30/2007 7:51:17 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (Fred 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
A lot of Freepers say that, but he’s the only candidate who’s got the edge on Hillary in the Florida polls. If he’s so unpopular among NYers, then why do they support him?

I'm afraid you'll have to be more specific before I can answer that. To which polls are you referring?

26 posted on 05/30/2007 7:54:29 AM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman

In a recent, online poll which measured not just who people wanted for the nominee but polled their feelings towards the other candidates, Romney and Thompson supporters had generally positive views of the other candidates. I think that’s healthy. Ron Paul “supporters” had nothing good to say about anyone else. This is not healthy. A Romney/Thompson primary could be very good for the party.


27 posted on 05/30/2007 7:54:55 AM PDT by Reaganesque (Romney 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
It's not just the MSM. Many here have objected to it. How about...
a candidate who has all the right positions on the issues, one you agree with, one who can beat Hillary. But...he's a Baptist. Can't have that, I'm sitting this election out... Now I know many do have grave concerns about the Mormon faith and many call it a cult, but whomever wins the nomination, let's hope he can beat HER in the final election.

Guiliani? Italian...naah, don't want him in. He'd be pals with the Mafia.
McCain? Too old. Not a young guy like Reagan was.
Fred Thompson? An actor. I don't want Hollywood influencing his vote.
Let's see, what other excuses I can find...

If you feel his Mormonism disqualifies him, then so be it, but if we wind up with a weaker candidate, whomever he is, be prepared for a good cry come 1/20/09 when she raises her right hand to take the Oath of Office, with the First Husband by her side.

28 posted on 05/30/2007 7:59:44 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

I like Mitt and all, but Deseret News isn’t exactly a non-biased source here...


29 posted on 05/30/2007 8:06:59 AM PDT by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesScorp

True, but the article does make some very valid points and the polls in MI, NH and IA tend to support the article’s claim. But, it is still early and anything can happen.


30 posted on 05/30/2007 8:09:51 AM PDT by Reaganesque (Romney 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher

I sincerely hope that you are right.

I am quite concerned for the future because I have children, and now even grandchildren.


31 posted on 05/30/2007 8:17:25 AM PDT by Radix ( Honey, I shrunk our Carbon Footprint.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

It’s going to be Romney / Thompson. And they’ll win.


32 posted on 05/30/2007 8:21:36 AM PDT by D-Chivas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D-Chivas

Change that to Thompson/Romney and I’ll be supporting them.


33 posted on 05/30/2007 8:23:08 AM PDT by piceapungens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

I hope you’re right, but I think you’ve gotta look at it on a state by state basis. Kerry almost pulled it out. He lost Fla. If he’d won Fla, then he would have won. If he’d won Ohio, he would have won. I don’t think that Kerry was any stronger a candidate than Hillary will be.


34 posted on 05/30/2007 8:27:39 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: highball; colorcountry; MHGinTN; Colofornian; FastCoyote; Elsie

15 posts, bigotry card played!


35 posted on 05/30/2007 8:29:26 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Thanks congress and President Bush, I'm feeling very non-multi-culti today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DesScorp

The Deseret Morning News is a newspaper published in Salt Lake City, Utah, and is Utah’s oldest continually published daily newspaper. It has the second largest daily circulation in the state behind The Salt Lake Tribune. The Deseret Morning News is owned by Deseret News Publishing Company, a subsidiary of Deseret Management Corporation, which is a for-profit business holdings company owned by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (widely known as the Mormon or LDS Church).


36 posted on 05/30/2007 8:43:23 AM PDT by colorcountry ("You step in crap once and spend the rest of your life scraping it off.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: mirkwood

Nice fellow, but this race belongs to Mitt and Fred!


37 posted on 05/30/2007 8:46:15 AM PDT by restornu (Matt.10:16 Lord's sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye wise as serpents & harmless as doves ~ Mitt 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

You mean 14 posts.


38 posted on 05/30/2007 8:46:44 AM PDT by nowandlater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry
widely known as the Mormon or LDS Church) The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints.
39 posted on 05/30/2007 8:49:09 AM PDT by restornu (Matt.10:16 Lord's sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye wise as serpents & harmless as doves ~ Mitt 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: FastCoyote

Tick: “The Constitution prohibits a religious test for office...”
Coyote: “No, it doesnt”

OH yes it does! Explicitly.

Article VI
All debts contracted and engagements entered into, before the adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.

This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


40 posted on 05/30/2007 8:57:30 AM PDT by Nervous Tick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: D-Chivas

Thompson WILL NOT take a VP slot. He stated that in no uncertain terms. There is no possible reason for him to do so.


41 posted on 05/30/2007 8:59:07 AM PDT by Politicalmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry

>>a for-profit business holdings company owned by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

the Mormon Church also owns Bonneville Broadcasting which
has among its stations “Washington Post Radio” in DC
(the WaPo doesn’t own the stations but puts their content
on them)

Wikipedia: “Bonneville owns about 30 radio stations and one television station...On January 4, 2006, Bonneville and The Washington Post announced that the frequencies currently used by WTOP, 1500 kHz and 107.7 MHz, would be reassigned to a new station, “Washington Post Radio.” It’s kind of a weird setup; it looks like WaPo owns the station but under FCC
rules (unless grandfathered in) they can’t, I believe,
so I think Bonneville owns them and has the WaPo running them.


42 posted on 05/30/2007 9:00:21 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

>>Kerry almost pulled it out.

Had his running mate won his home state, Lurch and the Silky
Pony would be running for re-election now...and had Gore
won HIS home state in ‘00...that would have put him over
the top.

Some on the Left argue that the pres. election should be decided by popular vote. That wouldn’t affect the ‘04 election
though as I believe W won by 5,000,000 votes or so nationwide.


43 posted on 05/30/2007 9:02:59 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39; colorcountry; MHGinTN; Colofornian; FastCoyote; Elsie

You don’t think that attacking a candidate solely for being a Mormon is bigotry?

If so, then I respectfully disagree. I’m not a fan of Mitt, but a candidate’s faith ought to be off-limits. Surely there are plenty of substantive reasons to oppose him without resorting to the religion card.


44 posted on 05/30/2007 9:09:55 AM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

The LDS Church Inc has several “for profit” companies who own many media outlets as you have so aptly stated.

They own agricultural businesses, insurance companies, Real Estate conglomerates. It is extrememly difficult in most cases to trace LDS money. They use venture capitalists like Mitt Romney to manage their assets.

Kinda makes you wonder just how Mitt made his huge fortune doesn’t it. Venture Capitalists like Mitt invest money for others. It would be an interesting task to dive into and sort out. I don’t know much about stocks, bonds, trading, umbrella companies, and venture capital, but I do know that many of the LDS heirarchy are CEOs of companies that fit the description of the above. I do know that the LDS Church has not published financial data for years (since the 1950’s). Do Americans really want Mitt for POTUS?


45 posted on 05/30/2007 9:13:35 AM PDT by colorcountry ("You step in crap once and spend the rest of your life scraping it off.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick; FastCoyote

It is about useless to engage FastCoyote. He never lets facts get in the way of his diatribe. He must scout for Romney posts, because that is the only place I ever see him.


46 posted on 05/30/2007 9:22:35 AM PDT by DanielLongo (Don't tread on me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Every debate will be like an Evander Holyfield/Pee-wee Herman fight. Can’t wait!


47 posted on 05/30/2007 9:29:27 AM PDT by DanielLongo (Don't tread on me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

I’d be quite happy with a Thompson/pres., Romney/VP ticket.


48 posted on 05/30/2007 9:30:06 AM PDT by ellery (I don't remember a constitutional amendment that gives you the right not to be identified-R.Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

LOL! I just posted about seeing the FastCoyote character. You managed to round up all the other usual suspects. The only place I ever see their posts is on Romney threads. Too funny.


49 posted on 05/30/2007 9:34:04 AM PDT by DanielLongo (Don't tread on me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: highball
You don’t think that attacking a candidate solely for being a Mormon is bigotry? If so, then I respectfully disagree. I’m not a fan of Mitt, but a candidate’s faith ought to be off-limits...

First of all, where were you when Pat Robertson ran for prez & his faith was being attacked? [OK, if you're a still a freckled-face lad, I guess you're off the hook :0 ]

Mitt's a two-timin' bishop...I mean two-term bishop...and a one-time stake prez in the LDS church. Imagine some Roman Catholic candidate whose background includes a few church titles. That person's faith is going to be treated irrelevant by most folks? (No way)

And so merely to bring up the faith is "bigotry?" (So two LDS folks are having his convo come next primary: "Who are you going to vote for?" The other says: "Mitt, he's Mormon." So I guess that's "bigotry," too, eh? An LDS person who sizes up Mitt as being Mormon and casts a vote only or primarily based on Mitt's religious tie.

50 posted on 05/30/2007 9:37:22 AM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-168 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson