Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Journal Finally Gets It : Says US Job Market May Not Be As Strong As Reported (Naysayer alert)
New York Post Business Column ^ | 05/31/2007 | John Crudele

Posted on 06/01/2007 7:02:03 AM PDT by SirLinksalot

Edited on 06/01/2007 7:20:25 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator. [history]

It only took the nation's most prominent business newspaper a decade and a half to figure it out, but the Job Market's Strength May Have Been Overstated.

That was the headline the other day in The Wall Street Journal, which considers itself the nation's pre-eminent financial newspaper.


(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: crudele; jobs; journal; unemployment; wallstreet Comment #1 Removed by Moderator

To: SirLinksalot

I don’t know - somehow 9 million Mexicans who shouldn’t have somehow found employment.

It doesn’t look like a bad job market to me.


2 posted on 06/01/2007 7:07:06 AM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
If they aren't careful, the press will soon figure out why inflation is really worse than advertised

Nah, the press doesn't want to report that because it's the way the government is attempting to deal with the looming Social Security shortfall.

3 posted on 06/01/2007 7:09:20 AM PDT by dirtboy (A store clerk has done more to fight the WOT than Rudy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
John could count all the jobs himself. Quick, you’ve got a month.
4 posted on 06/01/2007 7:10:17 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so dumb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots

North African Muslims have no trouble finding jobs in the Twin Cities. Fact is, the place is overrun with them. How’d this happen ?


5 posted on 06/01/2007 7:10:18 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots

“It doesn’t look like a bad job market to me.”

You aren’t competing for a job with those “9 million Mexicans”, are you?

By the way, where did you get the “9 million” number from?


6 posted on 06/01/2007 7:15:54 AM PDT by gas0linealley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
If they aren't careful, the press will soon figure out why inflation is really worse than advertised and how big the federal budget deficit really is.
IMO they won't. They'll ignore it just like they have in the past.
7 posted on 06/01/2007 7:16:20 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

I read a newsletter by Jim Shepherd (http://jasmts.com/) over a year ago that explained that there are also many who have had their unemployment benefits expire and thus can’t claim to be unemployed and many others who are simply living off the equity in their primary residence which explains why the debt levels for the average American are going through the roof and why the savings rate is now negative. The term “smoke and mirrors” comes to mind.


8 posted on 06/01/2007 7:17:18 AM PDT by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gas0linealley
By the way, where did you get the “9 million” number from?

I'd like to know myself.

Some are even estimating 12 Million illegals. Do we really know how many there are ?
9 posted on 06/01/2007 7:19:42 AM PDT by SirLinksalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

Addendum: Mr. Shepherd also talks alot about the loss of manufacturing jobs overseas due to free trade since Clinton signed it into law.


10 posted on 06/01/2007 7:20:26 AM PDT by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

NY Post material must be excerpted in all circustances. Please make a note of it.


11 posted on 06/01/2007 7:21:53 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rockitz; Mase
I read a newsletter by Jim Shepherd (http://jasmts.com/) over a year ago that explained that there are also many who have had their unemployment benefits expire and thus can’t claim to be unemployed . . . .

Aw Jeez, not this crap again.

12 posted on 06/01/2007 7:23:15 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

I didn’t bother to read the other article, the one about the number of new jobs in May, because I don’t trust the Government to put out honest numbers.

As I was thinking about that, you posted this article. Great minds...

Some writers are guessing that the number of illegals may top twenty million.


13 posted on 06/01/2007 7:30:43 AM PDT by gas0linealley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
explained that there are also many who have had their unemployment benefits expire and thus can’t claim to be unemployed

LOL!

14 posted on 06/01/2007 7:34:06 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so dumb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gas0linealley
By the way, where did you get the “9 million” number from?

The numbers commonly tossed about range from 6-20 million ILLEGAL aliens invading the USA. The same Mexicans who boo the US National anthem at sporting events and who booed Miss USA during a recent beauty pageant.

Even the MSM can't hide this issue: USA TODAY +6 million

Every major newspaper in the country that has reported a number -- from the Wall Street Journal to the Los Angeles Times to the Boston Herald to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch -- has given an estimate of about 11 million or 12 million.

I just split the difference - this is about 10% of Mexico's population.

15 posted on 06/01/2007 7:35:05 AM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots

The Wall Steet Journals NEWS PORTION IS and WAS rated among the most LIBERAL in the new media.

The reason they are seen as “conservative” is because of the editorial page the news people generally disregard.

This is just a piling on by liberal reporters.


16 posted on 06/01/2007 7:37:09 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
I read a newsletter by Jim Shepherd (http://jasmts.com/) over a year ago that explained that there are also many who have had their unemployment benefits expire and thus can’t claim to be unemployed

Then Jim Shepherd is an idiot who never bothered to learn how the unemployment rate is calculated. Anyone interested can go to the BLS site linked below:

BLS FAQ's

..which explains why the debt levels for the average American are going through the roof and why the savings rate is now negative. The term “smoke and mirrors” comes to mind.

There's a term that comes to mind but it's not smoke and mirrors.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Looks like our debt to income ratio has increased by less than 1% over the past decade during a time of historically low interest rates and record home ownership. Does this look like our debt is going through the roof to you?

If the savings rate is so bad today, why have we achieved a record household net worth in this country? The savings rate, as calculated by the government, is always highest during economic downturns. As a matter of fact, the rate of savings was 12% during the 1982 recession. Maybe Americans find better returns in the stock markets than they do in passbook savings. I'd suggest other sources for your information than Jim Shepherd.

17 posted on 06/01/2007 7:41:26 AM PDT by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mase

What does the Federal Reserve say about the money supply? Exactly how many dollars are in circulation and how many are being added quarterly?


18 posted on 06/01/2007 7:57:31 AM PDT by gas0linealley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: gas0linealley

If after the 1986 Amnesty it was determined that the actual Illegal Alien figure was 3X’s the bogus number published prior to passage the ‘86 Amnesty bill!

Thus, a better estimate today is likely more than 30 MILLION illegals.....probably even more than 3X’s the bogus 12 Million given by the Amnesty crowd....IOWs, 36 Million ILLEGAL INVADERS+


19 posted on 06/01/2007 8:12:37 AM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gas0linealley
Why don’t you explain deflation?
20 posted on 06/01/2007 8:20:06 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so dumb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: gas0linealley
What does the Federal Reserve say about the money supply?

That it's growing about 3% faster than the economy.

Exactly how many dollars are in circulation and how many are being added quarterly?

If I supplied this information for you what could you possibly do with it? Besides, what does this have to do with how the unemployment rate is calculated or what our debt to income ratio is?

21 posted on 06/01/2007 8:22:21 AM PDT by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mase

A public corporation which either didn’t know how many shares of its stock were in existence, and how many new shares were being printed quarterly, or refused to divulge that information to interested parties, would have only itself to blame if its trustworthiness was called into question.

That is the situation with the Federal Reserve. You probably know it and yet you tout their pronouncements about the economy etc.

Tsk, tsk.


22 posted on 06/01/2007 8:33:49 AM PDT by gas0linealley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: gas0linealley
A public corporation which either didn’t know how many shares of its stock were in existence, and how many new shares were being printed quarterly

You don't understand how money is created, do you?

23 posted on 06/01/2007 8:37:21 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so dumb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots

Just another SOCIALIST ZOT


24 posted on 06/01/2007 8:44:04 AM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

“Deflation”:

A. Re. the housing market. Subtract approx. ten percent of the population from the housing market and residential real estate prices will drop faster than they currently are.

Results: Rating entities will be forced to downgrade “Securitized” paper with the result that pension funds, insurance companies, and other institutional investors will be seeking compensation from Wall Street.

Many homeowners will be “upside down” re. home equity vs. debt. Abandonments will accelerate resulting in neighborhood value erosion, worsening the price decline.

More to follow...


25 posted on 06/01/2007 8:50:20 AM PDT by gas0linealley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
You don't understand how money is created, do you?

Oh, I think I do. It is printed on paper, unless it is the loose change variety, in which case it is made primarily of the cheapest metals available.
26 posted on 06/01/2007 8:55:02 AM PDT by gas0linealley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: gas0linealley
Subtract approx. ten percent of the population from the housing market and residential real estate prices will drop faster than they currently are.

What or who would subtract 10% of the population from the housing market?

Rating entities will be forced to downgrade “Securitized” paper with the result that pension funds, insurance companies, and other institutional investors will be seeking compensation from Wall Street.

So what?

Many homeowners will be “upside down” re. home equity vs. debt.

Still have to live somewhere.

More to follow...

Will it make sense? Will it have something to do with deflation?

27 posted on 06/01/2007 8:57:43 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so dumb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: gas0linealley
Oh, I think I do.

I doubt it. You understand that the Fed doesn't create the entire money supply?

28 posted on 06/01/2007 8:58:47 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so dumb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
You don't understand how money is created, do you?

Where are all these tin foilers coming from who think the Federal Reserve has 666 inscribed above the doorway to their building?

I used to think they were joking when they claimed it was the Fed on the grassy knoll in 1963. But these loonies are serious. Bad craziness.

29 posted on 06/01/2007 9:06:47 AM PDT by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Mase
Where are all these tin foilers coming from who think the Federal Reserve has 666 inscribed above the doorway to their building?

Straight from a goldbug website.

30 posted on 06/01/2007 9:12:53 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so dumb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot; Mase

Neither of you offer intelligent rebuttals, only efforts to portray those who disagree with you as mental defectives.

Dream on.


31 posted on 06/01/2007 9:20:42 AM PDT by gas0linealley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: gas0linealley

You make it so easy.


32 posted on 06/01/2007 9:25:36 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so dumb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

“I doubt it. You understand that the Fed doesn’t create the entire money supply?”

I would like you to tell me exactly how many dollars now exist, and how many new dollars are being added each quarter. If you also want to tell me other FACTS about the Federal Reserve, I’m open to that.


33 posted on 06/01/2007 9:28:06 AM PDT by gas0linealley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: gas0linealley
I would like you to tell me exactly how many dollars now exist

I don't know. Neither does the Federal Reserve. Do you?

and how many new dollars are being added each quarter.

Added by who?

34 posted on 06/01/2007 9:31:01 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so dumb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

“Added by who?”

Let’s start with the US Treasury.


35 posted on 06/01/2007 9:39:37 AM PDT by gas0linealley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: gas0linealley
How do you think the Treasury impacts the money supply?
36 posted on 06/01/2007 9:40:41 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so dumb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Have they sold the printing presses to China?


37 posted on 06/01/2007 9:47:28 AM PDT by gas0linealley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: gas0linealley
You’re asking how much money is printed every quarter?

You know that printed money is only a small portion of the money supply, don’t you?

38 posted on 06/01/2007 9:51:41 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so dumb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

You either don’t know the answer, or you are trying to conceal it to protect your position.

It is impossible to make intelligent, well informed, decisions about our currency without knowing how many dollars presently exist, and how many new dollars will be added each quarter.

The Fed must know (excepting counterfeit) but they aren’t telling the PUBLIC.

Such information must be very valuable.


39 posted on 06/01/2007 9:58:18 AM PDT by gas0linealley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: gas0linealley
You either don’t know the answer, or you are trying to conceal it to protect your position.

What position?

The Fed must know (excepting counterfeit) but they aren’t telling the PUBLIC.

Currency in circulation is currently $815.177 billion.

FEDERAL RESERVE Statistical Release

That's an increase of $15.4 billion in the last year.

Such information must be very valuable.

If you say so.

Do you understand that the Fed (or the Treasury) isn't responsible for all the dollars in circulation? Yes or no?

40 posted on 06/01/2007 10:04:18 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so dumb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

What do you mean: “responsible”?


41 posted on 06/01/2007 10:44:59 AM PDT by gas0linealley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: gas0linealley
Every dollar in money supply is not a dollar issued (or printed) by the Fed.
42 posted on 06/01/2007 10:48:11 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so dumb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

So what?


43 posted on 06/01/2007 10:54:52 AM PDT by gas0linealley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: gas0linealley
So they’re not responsible for every dollar in money supply.
44 posted on 06/01/2007 10:56:36 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so dumb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Who said they are?


45 posted on 06/01/2007 11:17:27 AM PDT by gas0linealley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: gas0linealley

You?


46 posted on 06/01/2007 11:19:21 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so dumb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
The Journal Finally Gets It : Says US Job Market May Not Be As Strong
As Reported (Naysayer alert)


Shall wonders ever cease?
Maybe the WSJ will admit there is noticeable inflation for regular
consumers.
(said watching the steady march up in food/beverage prices).

Not that I'm whining...2-3% inflation per annum is just normal.
I just get tired of the deceit from media/guvmint sources saying
how limp inflation is.
(And yes...I know current conditions beat the h-ll out of the
Carter years...I managed to survive that mess!)
47 posted on 06/01/2007 11:22:01 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots

“The Journal - as well as its sister publication, Barron’s, and The New York Times - suddenly discovered that Washington’s numbers don’t jibe with figures compiled on a quarterly basis by the individual states.”

Not so. I remember reading a Barron’s fifteen or so years ago where columnist Abelson (?) was saying that it was insane for major investment decisions to be made based on government figures that were bogus, jiggered for a current administration’s purposes, and revised later when their impact has passed.


48 posted on 06/01/2007 11:22:34 AM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VOA

Another thing that’s always bothered me — these surveys of employers that “plan to hire workers.” Well, anybody can answer “yes” to that one....the real question is whether they’ll actually do it or not.


49 posted on 06/01/2007 1:21:59 PM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Fee

ping


50 posted on 06/02/2007 4:07:12 AM PDT by gas0linealley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson