Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: EPW Comm Team
2 posted on
06/03/2007 11:24:03 AM PDT by
sourcery
(Democrat: n. 1. Quiche-eating surrender donkey.)
To: EPW Comm Team
That Chinese pet food has a low carbon footprint; it kills animals.
3 posted on
06/03/2007 11:24:37 AM PDT by
P-40
(Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
To: EPW Comm Team
Oh, yeah, we should just stop farming in the US altogether and let other countries supply us with food. Great idea!/SAR
4 posted on
06/03/2007 11:25:10 AM PDT by
calex59
To: EPW Comm Team
This diversity of foods from all over the world, especially produce, mean that the shopper is able to get more nutritious foods year round. It also spreads wealth to many areas of the world who otherwise have few products to export. I’ll take those tangible human benefit over the man-made, faith-based hysteria about global warming. Just look at al Gore’s girth and you know where he comes down in this trade off.
7 posted on
06/03/2007 11:29:02 AM PDT by
elhombrelibre
(Al Qaeda knows Iraq's strategic value, yet the Democrats work day and night for our defeat there.)
To: EPW Comm Team
But, as Richard Gray discovers, produce from the other side of the world can actually have a smaller carbon footprintAnd it's soooo much safer! /sarc
8 posted on
06/03/2007 11:29:17 AM PDT by
Marie
(Unintended consequences.)
To: EPW Comm Team
This whole issue is idiotic. The cost and carbon footprint of transportation is generally among the least important factors in the food supply.
9 posted on
06/03/2007 11:29:53 AM PDT by
Sherman Logan
(Offendo ergo sum)
To: EPW Comm Team
There is a smaller carbon footprint because the peons just pee on the veggies to water them.
14 posted on
06/03/2007 11:43:37 AM PDT by
donna
(Men are the new women.)
To: EPW Comm Team
Hollywood should do the right thing and stop eating entirely.
To: EPW Comm Team
I like locally grown food because it supports people in my community.
To: EPW Comm Team
Why Ben and Jerry's cows belching contribute to global warming. Hilarious!
http://talk.livedaily.com/showthread.php?p=11214059
18 posted on
06/03/2007 12:21:30 PM PDT by
tflabo
(<p>)
To: EPW Comm Team
Save the environment,
kill an environmentalist.
19 posted on
06/03/2007 12:21:43 PM PDT by
TheDon
(The DemocRAT party is the party of TREASON! Overthrow the terrorist's congress!)
To: EPW Comm Team
It’s all relative. There was more pollution in England and the rest of Europe in the 18th century than there is today.
The Environmentalists will never be happy until they have killed off most of the population (except themselves) and have the rest of the population working, tilling the soil by hand (except themselves).
20 posted on
06/03/2007 12:33:34 PM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: EPW Comm Team
It can only happen in the UK, which seems to have double the population of enviro-wienies. Go ahead, destroy your local farm industry you morons. The UK has been very entertaining lately, what with the rush of gullible sheeple running out to buy roof top windmills, spending thousands of "pounds" only to find out that
A) they don't work as claimed, and
B) They make a lot of noise mounted on roof tops, and
C) They have to buy electricity from "the grid" anyways.
Of couse, the day will come when the sheeple realize that they have to stick their windmills a lot further up into "clean air' for them to work properly, and UK towns and cities will become very silly looking with housands of tiny windmills sticking 100 feet above houses on flimsy poles supported with guy wires.
The UK court rooms will also see increased activity from lawsuits against windmill owners when the blades break off during storms and kill their pets and children.
To: EPW Comm Team
smaller carbon footprint, but larger melamine footprint, larger death footprint. . get a grip
BTW. I smell B.S.
24 posted on
06/03/2007 1:45:32 PM PDT by
bullfeather
(illegitimate non carborundum)
To: EPW Comm Team
Has anyone noticed how the church of climate change insists that individuals sacrifice individual good for a supposed common good. Now what, and who, does that sound like?
To: EPW Comm Team
I personally have come to enjoy the pesticides (that were banned in this country) on the fruits and vegies from South and Central America and the antifreeze toothpaste and tainted grain from China. Lets lower the carbon footprint in the USA by importing all of our foods this way we will truely be a green nation, we will have saved the world and we will all be dead from cancer!
30 posted on
06/03/2007 4:44:22 PM PDT by
ronnie raygun
(I'd rather be hunting with dick than driving with ted)
To: EPW Comm Team; OKSooner; honolulugal; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; gruffwolf; ...
Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown
New!!: Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH
Ping me if you find one I've missed.
32 posted on
06/03/2007 6:01:11 PM PDT by
xcamel
("It's Thompson Time!")
To: EPW Comm Team
The term "Carbon Footprint" is this week's winner of.....
34 posted on
06/03/2007 6:09:30 PM PDT by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
To: EPW Comm Team
WTF? So now we are at the point where we are measuring ‘carbon footprints’ of our food???
Why don’t we just do like all good environmentalists want us to do a Jim Jones and have a mass human suicide so we can save the world. For... um for... well I don’t know why, but it really would be good for “Earth”. /sarcasm
To: EPW Comm Team; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; alrea; ...
38 posted on
10/25/2015 10:11:17 PM PDT by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Democrats and GOP-e: a difference of degree, not philosophy)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson