Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DNA Research With Terror Risk-Scientists Report Altering Bacterium To Make It More Infectious
Washington Post ^ | 01 June 2007 | Rick Weiss

Posted on 06/04/2007 9:41:14 PM PDT by BGHater

Researchers in Germany reported Thursday that they had altered the DNA of a disease-causing bacterium so that it can infect a species it cannot normally sicken.

Experts called the development a double-edged advance. Although the research could deepen scientists' understanding of human diseases, it also could speed development of novel bioterror agents.

The change in infectiousness - the first of its kind ever engineered from scratch - poses no direct threat to human health, scientists said, because the microbe already causes a human disease - the food-borne illness called listeriosis.

The change allows that microbe to sicken mice, a species that it has no natural capacity to infect.

Still, the work has biosecurity implications because it could, in theory, be applied in reverse, endowing a bacterium that causes a serious animal disease with an unprecedented ability to sicken people.

Several experts said they were disappointed that the report, in today's issue of the journal Cell, does not mention those implications.

Also worrisome to some is that Cell's editors did not seek outside advice on whether publication of the study posed a security threat. Although in this case the consensus appears to be that it would easily pass muster, several U.S. organizations have called for such reviews when "dual use" microbiological advances are submitted for publication.

"What this really points out is the difficulty of dealing with all these issues," said Claire Fraser-Liggett, director of the Institute of Genome Sciences at the University of Maryland School of Medicine, who has participated in the development of standards for publishing such research. "It's hard to come up with guidelines that are absolute or anticipate everything that scientists are going to do."

Aside from such worries, scientists said that the new work marked a remarkable achievement in protein biophysics, a quickly maturing field that is revealing how proteins - the workhorses of living cells - interact with one another on the atomic scale.

Study leaders Wolf-Dieter Schubert and Andreas Lengeling, of the Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research in Braunschweig, knew that a particular protein on the surface of the bacterium Listeria monocytogenes was crucial to its ability to infect human intestinal cells. And they knew how the mouse version of that protein differs slightly from the human version - which accounts for the microbe's inability to infect mice.

Based on knowledge about how differently charged proteins interact with each other, the researchers predicted that the Listeria protein would settle reasonably well onto the mouse intestinal receptor if they could change just two of the bacterial protein's amino acids, which are the building blocks of proteins. In their work, they successfully re-engineered Listeria's DNA code so the microbe would start making surface proteins containing the two substitute amino acids.

That made the difference. When the researchers fed the altered bacteria to mice, the animals got sick with listeriosis.

TOPICS: Miscellaneous; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bacteria; bioterror; dna; germs

1 posted on 06/04/2007 9:41:18 PM PDT by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Not really that hard to do-use a viral vector to insert a gene into the cells of a harmless microbe that changes the function of the microbe. Id be surprised to earn this is really the first time someone has done this..

2 posted on 06/04/2007 9:47:45 PM PDT by cardinal4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4

A bacteria’s infectious machinery is something of a trade-off with its ability to compete in natural environments. Otherwise, there would be nothing but deadly strains in the world. It could still be a lethal attack weapon, but would basically be limited to a local area, and perhaps only the immediate target. Beautifully self-limiting.

Flus on the other hand.....

3 posted on 06/04/2007 9:59:01 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
Imagine increasing the potency of viruses and tailoring them to infect people with specific genetic traits.

Someone's going to kill a lot of people that way, some day.


4 posted on 06/04/2007 10:03:27 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (If by "amnesty" you mean "Impeachment and removal from office", then I'm all for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
In other experiments, the researchers repeatedly whacked themselves in the face with razorblade-studded rubber mallets to see if they would bleed.

Is this the endpoint of Western civilization - insanity?

5 posted on 06/05/2007 5:12:40 AM PDT by an amused spectator (Gun Control, the Sequel: More and Morerer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson