Skip to comments.
30 Taliban Reported Drowned As NATO Sinks Boat (Again)
NY Times ^
| June 6, 2007
| ABDUL WAHEED WAFA
Posted on 06/06/2007 5:50:35 AM PDT by RDTF
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
To: Red Badger
This was the first and last bath they’ll ever have. *Sniff*
41
posted on
06/06/2007 6:37:35 AM PDT
by
piasa
(Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
To: NavyCanDo
A Navy?...these were ferries.....but you knew that (heh heh)..........
42
posted on
06/06/2007 6:38:22 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Bite your tongue. It tastes a lot better than crow................)
To: piasa
Well, at least they’ll be clean for their 72 mermaids......
43
posted on
06/06/2007 6:39:40 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Bite your tongue. It tastes a lot better than crow................)
To: U S Army EOD
44
posted on
06/06/2007 6:42:42 AM PDT
by
tiredoflaundry
(The greatest danger to our troops is the Congress of the United States.)
To: subterfuge
So the Times is interviewing Taliban "members"? I wonder if he is on staff with them? NY Times ^ | June 6, 2007 | by ABDUL WAHEED WAFA
I report, you decide...
45
posted on
06/06/2007 6:44:36 AM PDT
by
piasa
(Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
To: RDTF
It was the second sinking on the river reported in recent days. Another boat, carrying about 60 people, sank Saturday in the same area, although there were conflicting reports as to whether those aboard had been civilians or Taliban fightersAh, the money shot. You knew the NYT couldn't report any good news so they had to throw the old, "Well they weren't in uniform so they may have been civilians." Even after 4 years they still try to screw us over.
To: finnigan2
the ACLU will be screaming for NATOs hide.
Of course. It's waterboarding without the board.
47
posted on
06/06/2007 6:49:59 AM PDT
by
Thrownatbirth
(.....when the sidewalks are safe for the little guy.)
To: RDTF
48
posted on
06/06/2007 6:50:38 AM PDT
by
Suzy Quzy
(Hillary '08...Her Phoniness is Genuine!!!)
To: Thrownatbirth
with all the good lines on this thread that one was the best!
49
posted on
06/06/2007 6:53:11 AM PDT
by
RDTF
(www.imwithfred.com)
To: piasa
Nice. He probably just picks up the phone and calls the friggin’ Taliban. Has them on speed dial for convenience.
50
posted on
06/06/2007 6:54:14 AM PDT
by
subterfuge
(Today, Tolerance =greatest virtue;Hypocrisy=worst character defect; Discrimination =worst atrocity)
To: oh8eleven
BAHAHAHAHA I saw some of that video.
I don’t care what anybody says, I was laughing my arse off.
51
posted on
06/06/2007 6:55:22 AM PDT
by
wastedyears
(Check my profile for links to anti-illegal immigration T-shirts.)
To: RDTF
How many snail darters were killed by stray bullets?
We must quit shooting lead into the rivers without an environmental impact study. And what about the impact on the ecoology of the boat debris and organic pollution.- You know some LWL ( left wing loon) is going to bring this up in congress.
52
posted on
06/06/2007 6:55:33 AM PDT
by
Waverunner
( "Think for yourselves and let others enjoy the privilege to do so too." Voltaire)
To: RDTF
“He also reported heavy fighting elsewhere. Afghan troops were ambushed in Kandahar Province, also in southern Afghanistan. The soldiers called in airstrikes that killed an estimated 20 to 40 of the Taliban, General Azimi said.”
The ones on land do not appear safe either.
Their “spring offensive” has been baghdad bobbed.
To: RDTF
A boat load of passengers headed to paradise!
To: Holicheese
55
posted on
06/06/2007 6:59:03 AM PDT
by
SlowBoat407
(A living insult to islam since 1959.)
To: RDTF
Thanks. It was a late inning pinch hit.
56
posted on
06/06/2007 7:00:32 AM PDT
by
Thrownatbirth
(.....when the sidewalks are safe for the little guy.)
To: SlowBoat407
57
posted on
06/06/2007 7:06:34 AM PDT
by
Holicheese
(I love shrimp and grits.)
To: C210N
They were trying to deploy to Okinawa....
58
posted on
06/06/2007 7:13:29 AM PDT
by
expatpat
To: subterfuge
59
posted on
06/06/2007 7:14:28 AM PDT
by
expatpat
To: C210N
“But, my thinks the NYT is trying to drum up some sympathy, as if they were shot in the back. No, they weren’t fleeing, they were merely regrouping, so as to plan and execute their next attack on civilization.”
Exactly. The reason Grant was able to beat Lee was because he relentlessly followed Lee’s retreating forces. Had Meade chosen to aggressively pursue Lee’s fleeing army at Gettysburg, the war might have been over a year earlier.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson