Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Congressional earmarks funded Cornerstone
BY DAVE JANOSKI
STAFF WRITERS
06/03/2007

U.S. Rep. Paul E. Kanjorski used his seniority and ties to powerful Democrats to secure $10 million in contracts for his nephews’ firms.

Earmarking — the insertion of spending for specific pet projects into appropriations bills outside of the normal legislative process — has long been a controversial practice in Washington.

Over the last decade, the annual cost of earmarks has more than tripled, reaching $64 billion in 2006, according to the Congressional Research Service.

The new Democratic majorities in the House and Senate pledged to reform the process. But some observers of Congress say the few reforms that have been passed will do little to curb earmarks. Lawmakers in both houses have already submitted their earmark requests to party leaders as they prepare to work on the 2008 budget.

“The announcements have gone out by the committee chairs and ranking members: ‘Get your earmark requests out,’ ” said Ronald Utt, a senior research fellow with the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think-tank. “I don’t think anything has changed. Congress doesn’t seem to think there’s much wrong with this.”

In October, Mr. Kanjorski told The New York Times that his fellow Pennsylvania Democrat, John Murtha, a powerful member of the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, helped him get funding for eight to 10 projects, including contracts that went to Cornerstone Technologies LLC.

Murtha powerful ally

As a longtime senior member, and now chairman of the subcommittee, Mr. Murtha is able to insert earmarks into appropriations bills when House and Senate leaders meet in what is known as a conference committee to reconcile the separate appropriations bills approved in each chamber. The resulting conference reports — and the added earmarks — are then typically approved in both chambers with little debate or scrutiny.

http://www.thetimes-tribune.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=18420223&BRD=2185&PAG=461&dept_id=415898&rfi=6

1 posted on 06/07/2007 5:17:43 AM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Libloather

When they come out, stories about democrats often come out right AFTER the elections, while stories about republicans come out right BEFORE the elections.

The Dems have a year to determine if this story will hurt their candidate, and then replace him.


2 posted on 06/07/2007 5:23:04 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

The one guy that appears blameless is the scientist who was working on the technology. Amazingly all the congressman’s relatives got paid, but the scientist is out $600,000 .


4 posted on 06/07/2007 5:42:09 AM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

“It was just like the Three Stooges meet anthracite,” said Penn State fuel-sciences professor Harold Schobert, who worked on a federal contract with the firm. “These guys didn’t know how to order chemicals. They didn’t understand even the most fundamental aspects of how to conduct experiments.


MOney is a bad substitute for good management.


5 posted on 06/07/2007 6:14:44 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple ( Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

6 posted on 06/07/2007 6:23:28 AM PDT by Inquisitive1 (I know nothing except the fact of my ignorance - Socrates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson