Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jimmy Carter no longer the worst U.S. president.
6/8/07 | Joe Lynch

Posted on 06/08/2007 8:10:00 AM PDT by westcoastwillieg

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-178 last
To: Borges
I somewhat agree on that. The economy was headed toward the crapper (Nixon's wage and price controls, Ford's laughable "Whip Inflation Now") when Carter took over . But Carter didn't help with his doom and gloom, woe is us, bad United States attitude. He perpetuated the problem with his depressed and depressing attitude.

A President must lead, like a coach who knows how to fire up his team before the big game.

161 posted on 06/08/2007 10:55:29 PM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: westcoastwillieg

Naw, Jimmy Carter is still the worst President of modern history. Granted, Dubya ranks up there but Carter is the absolute worst.


162 posted on 06/08/2007 10:59:44 PM PDT by no dems (Dear God, how much longer are you going to let Robert Byrd and Ted Kennedy live?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: westcoastwillieg

Bush is a failure largely now but he is not the worst...he has company below him and yep....Jimmy is one of them.


163 posted on 06/08/2007 11:02:29 PM PDT by wardaddy (on parole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Feminists hate it when you bring up that Harding was the first President that women helped elect.

Your typical feminist has never even heard of President Harding. But what if women hadn't been given the right to vote...? I'll leave that can of worms for somebody else to open.

164 posted on 06/08/2007 11:10:56 PM PDT by Junior_G
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Paul Volker fixed Carter’s economy.

Carter inherited bad gas prices and did little to stop it or spending plus his malaise speeches were just awful.

He projected such weakness. Bush does not.

Bush projects (now) disconnected stubborness and he has a penchant for politcally correct finger pointing over anything ethnic or religious...a trait that bugs me to death.

I think his play by hunch personality was good in 10/01 but serves him poorly now.

Carter gave away:

Nicaragua
Iran
Panama Canal

Bush is trying to give away my culture....make no mistake of that and I truly believe he thinks folks like me trying to stop him are bigots same as they said we were sexists when we fought the Harriet thing.

One of his first acts as governor of Texas was to take down a memorial plaque to Confedrate dead that had been on state grounds for many years.

I never liked that but that sort of revsionist outlook sorta sums he and his NeoCon buds up pretty well and it has proven to be as problematic as I feared.

I first got a hint of Bush’s PC nature about sensitive stuff when he turned on Lott and went purely politcally correct on him....broke Ronnie’s law too but the Bushes never liked Ronnie much....they thought he was below them. Now Lott proved to be indefensible but seeing so called conservatives race hustle nd go PC like that was sad to watch

but Bush and his minions have done it time and again...they are true believers

I will be glad to see them gone.


165 posted on 06/08/2007 11:12:54 PM PDT by wardaddy (on parole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

Comment #166 Removed by Moderator

Comment #167 Removed by Moderator

To: westcoastwillieg

Guess what this is from?

‘‘CHAPTER 6—LANGUAGE OF THE
GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES
‘‘Sec.
‘‘161. Declaration of national language.
‘‘162. Preserving and enhancing the role of the national language.
‘‘§ 161. Declaration of national language
‘‘English is the national language of the United
States.
‘‘§ 162. Preserving and enhancing the role of the na
tional language
‘‘The Government of the United States shall preserve
and enhance the role of English as the national language
of the United States of America. Unless otherwise author
ized or provided by law, no person has a right, entitlement,
or claim to have the Government of the United States or
any of its officials or representatives act, communicate,
perform or provide services, or provide materials in any
language other than English. If exceptions are made, that
does not create a legal entitlement to additional services
in that language or any language other than English. If
any forms are issued by the Federal Government in a lan
guage other than English (or such forms are completed
in a language other than English), the English language
version of the form is the sole authority for all legal pur
poses.’’.
VerDate Aug 31 2005 02:47 May 11, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00732 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1348.PCS S1348 pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
733
•S 1348 PCS
b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of chap
ters for title 4, United States Code, is amended by adding
at the end the following:
‘‘6. Language of the Government of the United States ....... 161’’.


168 posted on 06/09/2007 3:09:01 PM PDT by Yankee Dutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnwayne

Can’t disagree with what you are saying.


169 posted on 06/10/2007 1:55:00 PM PDT by bestrongbpositive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: johnwayne
If Bush had signed the immigration bill that the House and Senate were attempting to pass then I would agree that his Presidency would be ultimately more of a disaster than Carter's. Thankfully, he hasn't had the opportunity to sign the bill.

He hasn't given up on it yet...

Bush Asks Reid To Resurrect 'Amnesty' Bill

170 posted on 06/10/2007 2:11:10 PM PDT by null and void (Wherever liberty has sprouted around the world, we find its seeds were watered with American blood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
That said, virtually every single decision Carter made was as dumb as this one. I can’t think of a good decision Carter made, but I can think of dozens that Bush has made.

Yes. Bush was an excellent President.

171 posted on 06/10/2007 2:16:02 PM PDT by null and void (Wherever liberty has sprouted around the world, we find its seeds were watered with American blood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: zeebee
Point of order:

Carter was simply inept. Clinton was evil.

Should be:

Carter is simply inept. Clinton is evil.

To which for the sake of accuracy I'm compelled to add:

Both Clintons are evil.

(The jury is still out on their spawn)...

172 posted on 06/10/2007 2:21:41 PM PDT by null and void (Wherever liberty has sprouted around the world, we find its seeds were watered with American blood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf

Sleeping? He looks crushed to death!


173 posted on 06/10/2007 2:26:34 PM PDT by Gum Shoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: westcoastwillieg
Sorry.
I lived through JIMMAH both as Georgia Governor, He was one of Georgia's' worst ever bar none
He still leads by a super wide margin, followed very closely by the Rapist-in-Chief KLINTOON.
174 posted on 06/10/2007 2:28:19 PM PDT by DeaconRed (If it weren't for the United States Military-There would be NO United States of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Yes to all.
Jimmy Carter was willing to surrender before anyone asked him too.


175 posted on 06/11/2007 5:41:35 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: westcoastwillieg

Lynch Joe.


176 posted on 06/11/2007 5:42:38 AM PDT by verity (Muhammed and Harry Reid are Dirt Bags)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnwayne
Bush on the other hand has no excuse.

Why not? If Reagan expected his plan to work (when previous ones didn't) why shouldn't Bush be allowed to think the same thing?

177 posted on 06/11/2007 10:07:17 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Weeedley
You meant to say Harding. Hoover was not that bad. He did not cause the Great Depression, because a president does NOT control the ecomomy. His measures against the depression were iladvised.

Presidents have plenty of power to influence the economy one way or another. From what I've read Hoover wasn't too fond of the stock market and used his influence to get the Federal Reserve to make big hikes in margin rates. He also was influential in getting companies to maintain wage levels that led to massive layoffs. FDR continued the same policy, but he made people enjoy the depression so much more than Hoover.

178 posted on 06/16/2007 3:56:44 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-178 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson