Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Two Heftiest Stars Found in Milky Way
Discovery News ^ | 6/7/07 | Larry O'Hanlon

Posted on 06/08/2007 12:35:40 PM PDT by LibWhacker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 06/08/2007 12:35:41 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Hefty? Noooo! They’re just big boned!


2 posted on 06/08/2007 12:36:33 PM PDT by Reaganesque (Romney 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Michael and Rosie?........


3 posted on 06/08/2007 12:37:06 PM PDT by Red Badger (Bite your tongue. It tastes a lot better than crow................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Rosie O’Donnell and Michael Moore?


4 posted on 06/08/2007 12:37:31 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

Damn, you got to be fast here on FR.


5 posted on 06/08/2007 12:38:06 PM PDT by dfwgator (The University of Florida - Still Championship U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

ooooh, beaten by 25 seconds.


6 posted on 06/08/2007 12:38:21 PM PDT by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a Liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tanniker Smith
Yeah, but I left no doubt I wasn't taking about Michael Jackson and Rosie Perez.
7 posted on 06/08/2007 12:41:39 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Dude, I was like, another Rosie O'Donnell thread?
8 posted on 06/08/2007 12:45:56 PM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Run Fred RUN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
"discovered in the southern Milky Way galaxy"

There's a North/South in our Galaxy? The Universe too?

9 posted on 06/08/2007 12:48:01 PM PDT by Deguello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
merely the sixth element out of more than two hundred and sixty

Last I checked there were 117 discovered/synthesized elements. Where the heck did "more than 260" come from?

10 posted on 06/08/2007 12:49:15 PM PDT by Turbopilot (iumop ap!sdn w,I 'aw dlaH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

"but its brothers and sisters are spread out over the galaxy now."

Hmmm... I wonder if there is any hope of ever being able to identify them?... Say, a thousand years from now when we have a complete census of all the stars in the Milky Way?

11 posted on 06/08/2007 12:51:29 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deguello

Yup, stay out of SE Milky Way. Bad neighborhood. ;-)


12 posted on 06/08/2007 12:54:15 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

LOLOL!!! took the words right outta my mouth!


13 posted on 06/08/2007 12:56:36 PM PDT by gimme1ibertee (Fred is here.....and now it'll be all right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Turbopilot

Good catch. I don’t know... Are they including the anti-elements?


14 posted on 06/08/2007 12:57:04 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

That certainly seems counter-intuitive. More “fuel” equals shorter life???? Hmmmmm.


15 posted on 06/08/2007 12:57:58 PM PDT by rednesss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

“..and both break the record — 83 times the sun’s mass — for the most massive stars found to date.”

....Yep,definitely Rosie and Michael.


16 posted on 06/08/2007 12:58:08 PM PDT by gimme1ibertee (Fred is here.....and now it'll be all right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

You sure do have to be fast! But anyway the sentiment got expressed, so all is not lost!


17 posted on 06/08/2007 1:02:02 PM PDT by twonie (Keep your guns - and stockpile ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rednesss
That certainly seems counter-intuitive. More “fuel” equals shorter life???? Hmmmmm.

More fuel = burns much, much, much faster.

Although it is fission rather than fusion you can compare it to having some U-235. A little bit will just toss out some radiation and last for millions of years. Add more and it gets more radioactive as spontanious splitting of the atoms cause others to split which will use up the uranium faster. Add some more and it only lasts for a fraction of a second before it blows up.

18 posted on 06/08/2007 1:03:13 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Parker v. DC: the best court decision of the year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rednesss
That certainly seems counter-intuitive. More “fuel” equals shorter life???? Hmmmmm.

More fuel = more mass = bigger reaction = higher outward pressure countering gravitational force keeping the whole thing in a nice, neat ball and the furnace going. When that pressure overcomes the gravity, the outer shell is blown away, or the whole magillah starts expanding until equilibrium is reached again. Blast furnace needs more fuel than a campfire to keep going for the same amount of time.

19 posted on 06/08/2007 1:05:23 PM PDT by SlowBoat407 (It's never a good time to get sucked into an evil vortex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Rosie and late Momma Cass and a large sandwich orbiting around both.


20 posted on 06/08/2007 1:07:04 PM PDT by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson