Posted on 06/15/2007 4:58:04 AM PDT by RedRover
NORTH CASTLE
At just age 26, Andrew McLaren has already had many roles in his life - soldier, bodyguard, playboy and, most recently, family man and political candidate.
The North Castle man is now trying his hand at another venture - acting.
He's starring in "Battle for Haditha," a film scheduled for release in January. It is based on allegations that Marines killed 24 Iraqis - including women and children - during a 2005 rampage in that Iraqi city.
"I kind of wanted to live a full life and do whatever I wanted to do," McLaren said recently about his rather unique résumé.
For McLaren, a former model, this is his first major role in a film, and his experience in the military helped him land the part.
"He had some combat experience in Iraq, and he and the other guys that were in the military give it a little credence as far as reality is concerned," said Gordon McLaren, Andrew's father and a Vietnam War veteran. "They've all been there. They've all seen it."
Andrew McLaren was a Marine for several years, which included a 2003 mission to Liberia to guard the U.S. Embassy during that country's civil war. He also served in Iraq, hunting for improvised explosive devices on the streets of Baghdad and helping to train members of the Iraqi army.
For his service, he received the Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal and the Humanitarian Service Medal, according to his honorable discharge papers.
McLaren returned from Iraq in 2005, but he soon went back to the war zone as an employee of the Blackwater USA private security firm. He said he earned top dollar guarding senators and Bush administration officials and even the president on one occasion.
The work of contractors like Blackwater has sparked controversy over the role of the private sector in war zones, with some critics charging they're mercenaries whose work exists outside normal legal oversight.
McLaren bristles at any suggestion that Blackwater employees are soldiers for hire. They're highly trained government contractors, he said.
"I was a certified special agent over there. We're not mercenaries," McLaren said. "We have authority from the U.S. government and we go through a strict vetting process."
The job is very dangerous. Part of the work included providing armed escort duty for U.S. officials going outside of Baghdad's relatively secure "Green Zone."
The work is also very lucrative. McLaren said he earned about $200,000 in eight months last year, money that allowed him to return to the U.S. periodically and enjoy a playboy lifestyle in Manhattan, driving around in a Ferrari and Lamborghini he rented. He also outfitted his own Lexus convertible with television sets, a DVD player and new rims.
But there came a time when the money and the job lost their allure, and McLaren wanted to settle back in this country with Melissa Garcia, a model he met at a fashion show in 2004.
"I had this great thing at home waiting for me, so that's why I left that job," McLaren said.
They married in October, about a month after he returned from Iraq. Melissa McLaren recalled recently that when she spoke to Andrew while he was in Iraq, she could sometimes hear mortar shells exploding in the background.
"It was a big ordeal every time I had to hang up the phone with him and not know when I was going to be able to speak to him next," she said "The money wasn't worth it. His life was more important."
McLaren returned to the U.S. in August and the couple moved out to California in September so she could pursue her modeling career and he could try out acting.
One day, McLaren noticed an ad in LA Weekly that said military men were wanted for a movie, but the ad didn't specify what it was about.
McLaren said he and hundreds of other hopefuls auditioned for 12 parts in the film. After several call-backs, he landed the role of Capt. Sampson - who heads a unit of Marines that's struck by a roadside bomb, killing one of them.
McLaren said his character is based loosely on a real-life Marine company commander, Capt. Lucas McConnell, who is facing charges in the incident.
The investigation into what happened at Haditha continues. After the bombing, enraged Marines killed the Iraqis, according to press reports. Several Marines have been brought up on murder charges, and four other officers have been accused of failing to investigate war crime allegations or covering them up, according to press reports.
"Battle for Haditha," filmed in Jordan, is the latest movie from British director Nick Broomfield, whose other films include "Kurt & Courtney," a 1998 documentary about Nirvana lead singer Kurt Cobain, who took his own life in 1994 at age 27, and his wife, singer Courtney Love. He also made "Biggie and Tupac," a 2002 documentary about the unsolved homicide cases of rap artists Tupac Shakur and Biggie Smalls.
Broomfield was busy recently with post-production work on "Battle for Haditha" and could not be reached for comment. A trailer from the film was recently shown at the Cannes Film Festival.
The trailer is chilling to watch. After a bomb set up by insurgents blows up a Humvee, a Marine is shown shooting Iraqis who have their hands up.
McLaren said he was initially concerned about how the movie would portray the military. In the end, however, he said it shows what it's like to be in combat and the realities soldiers face during war.
"The movie is told from an equal playing field - from the Iraqis' point of view, the insurgents' point of view and the Marines' point of view," McLaren said. "There's no black or white in this movie, it's all just a (messed) up situation for everybody."
He's also posted comments on an online forum for military service members asking them to keep an open mind about the film.
"We represented the Corps in a positive light. ... We would never sell out our fellow Marines for 15 minutes of fame," McLaren wrote. "This movie is far from liberal propaganda, and is the most accurate portrayal of the War on Terror yet."
During a recent interview, McLaren wore a "Battle for Haditha" T-shirt, which covered a tattoo on his shoulder of the World Trade Center. He also has images of cherry blossoms with skulls in the middle on his right arm. On his left arm is a tattoo of the Marine Corps eagle, globe and anchor symbol.
He and Melissa are expecting a baby in about four months. The couple and their 5-year-old daughter live with McLaren's parents in North Castle. McLaren attended Byram Hills High School for two years and graduated in 1999 from Avon Old Farms School, a private school in Avon, Conn.
McLaren said he hopes the "Battle for Haditha" leads to more roles. If he can't pursue an acting career, he has a backup plan. He's attending the New York City Police Academy next month.
He's also planning to run for a seat on the North Castle Town Board under the banner of the Veterans for Improvement Party. McLaren, who describes himself as a moderate Republican, acknowledges the odds of him winning a seat are daunting, but said he views the post as another chance to serve his country.
"I really, really want to get my voice out there," McLaren said.
I will invite Mr. McLaren to join this thread, and hope that he may.
Here's my take. From Day One, the Haditha Marines have been used as symbols. Time magazine called them "symbols of a war gone bad". Murtha picked up that theme and help turn Americans further from the war.
On the other side, the expedient response was to throw the Haditha Marines under the bus. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff made statements such as: "Fortunately, this type of thing doesn't happen very often..." As if it were already a proven fact.
Mr. McLaren says his role is based "loosely" on Capt. Lucas McConnell. There's no "loosely" about a movie depicting Marines murdering civilians. Anyone who sees the movie will believe it's factual.
The families of the Haditha Marines are taking out second mortages on their homes, wiping out 401k accounts, to pay for lawyers.
The first enlisted man charged for Haditha, LCpl. Justin Sharratt, is on his way to being exonerated after a year in hell for himself and his family. "Exonerated" may be the wrong word. As Capt. Jeffrey Dinsmore (3/1 Marines) has said, "While I continue to firmly believe that all will be acquitted, none of them will ever be truly exonerated." The media and movies such as this one have seen to that.
I have no reason to think Mr. McLaren is anything but an honorable man. I thank him for his service to our country.
But I respectfully ask him: please consider how you're helping destroy the lives of fellow Marines.
I will never have an open mind about that.
Well said... I join you in the request.
Of course, as far as the Marines are concerned, the damage has already been done. The film will be released before the Article 32s are completed—putting that much more pressure on the Corps to go to court martials on each of the accused (and incidentally increasing astronomically the lawyer fees).
I would hope that, in future, Mr. McLaren would at least point out to interviewers that the film is fiction.
The director has claimed he got the story from Marines “who were there”. I think he’s lying and would challenge him to name his sources.
"A trailer from the film was recently shown at the Cannes Film Festival" is another way of saying that this is a hatchet job.
[Mr] T
Murtha is getting desperate.
They must work furiously at preempting a fair Article 32 and trial.
Do you have any idea if the Newsmax report on the classified background of the Haditha event is accurate? Was a classified report released that stated a “white car” was to participate in an attack on Americans?
I have every reason to be confident in Phil Brennan’s report.
But would the intel about the white car stand up to scrutiny in a courtroom? Can’t say.
Sgt Wuterich’s Article 32 will be held on the third week in August. Capt. Dinsmore will certainly testify for the defense. We’ll see if the intel stands up to cross-examination.
Remember how Clinton and his hideous cronies fought the 9-11 film?
As noted above, no one gives a damn when it comes to lowly servicemen.
The reports about Cpt Dinsmore’s most recent testimony states that the prosecutor kept asking him if he had evidence that any of the dead were insurgents. The paper reports that Dinsmore finally agreed that they could have all been civilians.
It seemed an odd exchange that it would have to be asked so many times by the prosecutor before Dinsmore supposedly conceded. I wondered if he had classified info but was unable to share it at the time because it was still classified until this past week.
Do you have any thoughts on that?
The media reporting has been so poor that it’s difficult to get a real sense of the testimony and the impact it’s having.
The media is reporting the story from a presumption of guilt. The reporting does not reflect what’s really happening in the hearings—which is a search for truth to a reasonable degree of certainty.
There is grey area in any investigation. Even the NCIS agent who presented forensic evidence in the Sharratt hearing (evidence that I believe will exonerate the lance corporal) said his findings were highly probable but not absolutely certain.
Similarly, Capt Dinsmore’s testimony was to the data and conclusions an experienced S2 drew from them.
Insurgents ARE civilians. Is it possible that a military age male at the scene of an ambush with an AK-47 is just on his way to a wedding party?
Yes, it’s possible, but judgements in the heat of combat are based on instinct. We should never second guess that in a courtroom.
Insurgents are dressed as civilians. They are actually fighters in violation of standards of decent treatment of civilians. Few things are as reprehensible as intentionaly making true civilians into targets.
We represented the Corps in a positive light. ... We would never sell out our fellow Marines for 15 minutes of fame
That is good to hear.
Remember how Clinton and his hideous cronies fought the 9-11 film?
Wow! I completely forgot about that. I never was able to see the movie. Is it out on DVD? I remember very little press on it and in fact just from FREEPERS.
This is true in all cases in our vaunted "Criminal Justice System". The media over-exposes the more salacious charges in a high-visibility case, while giving no credence to the circumstances leading to the action. Just search for any MSM story on a defensive firearm use for examples.
Another problem is the costs involved. The real Criminal gets his paid for -- the innocent or not guilty/proven get no reimbursement in a criminal action. If lucky they can try the lottery of a civil action, but that also entails additional costs.
I do believe that the Brits (and most of their Commonwealth partners) have it right -- No report or publicity allowed by any Media except after Arraignment in a court; and no report or publicity until the conclusion of the trial and a Verdict is pronounced. You do have the right to know what's going on -- go sit in the court in your locality. You don't have a right to promulgate unfounded accusations far and wide to the detriment of either the prosecution or the defense or the possible tainting of the jury pool. I really believe that the OJ case would have had a far different outcome had Gil Garcetti not been able to game the system; likewise the Duke Hockey Team saga would also have been better for all if Nifong was muzzled from the start.
I have no reason to think Mr. McLaren is anything but an honorable man. I thank him for his service to our country.
But I respectfully ask him: please consider how you're helping destroy the lives of fellow Marines.
I will never have an open mind about that.
On this we agree. Also this 'movie' should not be released until after the conclusion of these cases. I don't think they will go much differently either way, as I still have more respect for the UCMJ system than the civilian counterpart -- but the future attitudes regardless of outcome will definitely be colored by the perceptions created thereby.
I second that Red. I have my doubts about this movie being “fair” to the Marines. After all, nothing has been fair about this whole mess. Besides, the info is slowly being declassified so who did the producer use as sources - the media, the “innocent civilians”?
Marine Ping!
I’m with you on all points.
I’d favor an immediate adoption of the British system. Unfortunately, men like John Adams was hooted down as a “monarchist” when he suggested America could adopt British practices. Unfortunately, too, the First Ammendment has been perverted by activist judges over the past fifty years so that it no longer only limits federal power.
I also agree about the UCMJ. I had the pleasure of speaking with Darryl Sharratt (father of LCpl. Justin Sharratt) who is EXTREMELY impressed with the IO and the whole way his son’s case is being handled in the hearing.
Yikes! Should have been “men like John Adams were hooted down” or “a man such as John Adams was...” Indecision leads to bad grammar.
The really important thing about Capt. Dinsmore’s testimony, of course, is that it was intel available to the Marines and helped guide their decisions.
Surprisingly Broomfield was able to interview some of the Marines involved in the incident. "We spent five days in a motel in San Diego interviewing them for probably 10 hours a day, just to get a sense of their lives and who they really were. They were very wary to begin with, but once people start talking, they really talk. The main Marine character we focus on was this guy called Ramirez. The night he got back from Iraq he broke into a truck and basically had post-traumatic stress and ended up driving into a house. He was best friends with the guy who was killed by the bomb, and then had the job of writing numbers on the dead people's heads and photographing them. They were extremely tough and had seen a lot of action. They talked about chasing each other around with people's legs and kicking people's brains around."
I assume by "Ramirez", the director means LCpl. Briones whose story is pretty much what Broomfield describes. Except that Briones (and another photographer, LCpl. Andrew Wright, who made similar accusations about a massacre) wasn't really "involved" in the incident. Neither Briones or Wright were there when it happened.
So, in brief, the movie is based on Marines who weren't there. Just like the main "witnesses" against the Haditha Marines weren't there either.
The film looks powerful. Realistic. Convincing. And it clearly shows Marines shooting Iraqis whose hands are in the air and posing no threat.
It clearly shows a massacre by out of control Marines against defenseless civilians.
Interesting article. I hope that it's the truth and this isn't a puff piece to promote the movie. I am skeptical and definitely don't think that it should be released until after all legal proceedings are completed.
See post 21 regarding the positive light that’s how shining upon the Corps.
Great post bump.
And a sincere thank you for posting the threads on the Pendelton 8 and related info.
[Mr] T
I didn’t know they had showers over there.(snicker)
MORAL RELATIVISM at it's most insidious!!
>Insurgents are dressed as civilians.<
Radical Islamofascists without uniform are not civilians. These people are raised to hate from birth. They are not our friends. The entire incident was a nasty setup.
obviously
My pleasure, troop.
You know, a lot of people assume I must have a personal stake in all this. I don’t. All I am is one pissed-off American.
That gets it in one, PISANO. When anyone piously presents “both sides” in a time of war, they want America to lose.
Looks like my skepticism was warranted.
Or lieutenants who would turn to a staff sergeant after an engagement and confide, “I’m recommending you for a Bronze Star.”
Unfortunately so.
WWII buddies of mine were angry that Spielberg showed infantrymen shooting surrendering Germans in “Saving Private Ryan”. What will Iraq vets make of this POS?
From what little I saw on that trailer he would probably be well advised to avoid Iraq vets.
TO ALL OF MY FELLOW LEATHERNECKS. THE MOVIE (BATTLE FOR HADITHA) FILMED IN JORDAN, IF ANYTHING WILL ACTUALLY HELP THE MARINES THAT ARE BEING CHARGED, IT IS FAR FROM A TYPICAL HOLLYWOOD MOVIE, IT IS MOSTLY INPROVISATION, DRAWING FROM THE REAL EXPERIENCES OF IRAQIS AND U.S MARINE COMBAT VETERANS. IT IS TOLD FROM THE IRAQIS POINT OF VIEW, THE INSURGENTS POINT OF VIEW, AND THE MARINES POINT OF VIEW AND WE HAVE THE MOST CAMERA TIME. BELIEVE ME WE STOOD UP FOR SSGT WUTERICH AND EVERYONE ELSE WHO DIDNT COP A PLEA. WE REPRESENTED THE CORPS IN A POSITIVE LIGHT. NONE OF US CONDONE KILLING CIVILIANS BUT MANY OF THE SO CALLED INNOCENTS WERE PROVEN INSURGENTS. EVEN MANY OF THE IRAQIS IN THE FILM UNDERSTOOD OUR POINTS. I AM PLAYING CAPTAIN SAMPSON AND I WAS IN COMBAT OPERATIONS IN IRAQ AND LIBERIA WHEN I WAS AN 0311. 3 OF THE OTHER MAIN CHARACTERS ARE ALSO FORMER INFANTRY MARINES WHO WERE IN FALUJAH AND HADITHA. WE WOULD NEVER SELL OUT OUR FELLOW MARINES FOR OUR 15 MINUTES OF FAME. WE WERE SKEPTICAL OF THE SUBJECT MATTER AT FIRST BUT WE ARE EXTREMELY PROUD OF THE FINISHED PRODUCT. WE KNOW THIS FILM WHICH YOU CAN SEE A PREVIEW AT (WWW.BARNEYBROOMFIELD.COM) WILL BE VERY CONTROVERSIAL, BUT PLEASE DONT JUDGE IT UNTIL YOU SEE IT. THIS FILM WILL SHOW THE WORLD OUR SACRIFICE AND OUR DEDICATION TO OUR COUNTRY AND HOW WE RISK OUR LIVES ONLY TO GET LOCKED UP IN THE BRIG FOR DOING OUR JOB AND PROTECTING OUR LIVES AND OUR BUDDIES LIVES. WHILE CNN SAYS WE ARE COLDBLOODED KILLERS AND MENTIONS NOTHING ABOUT THE TERRORISTS OR THE RUTHLESS COWARDNESS OF THE INSURGENCY THAT WE DEAL WITH EVERYDAY WHILE DEPLOYED. THE MOVIE ALSO IMPORTANTLY SHOWS THAT MANY IRAQI PEOPLE ARE PEACE LOVING AND ARE ALSO VICTIMS OF THESE SAME INSURGENTS. THIS MOVIE IS FAR FROM LIBERAL PROPAGANDA AND IS THE MOST ACCURATE PORTRAYAL OF THE WAR ON TERROR YET. HENCE THE NAME BATTLE FOR HADITHA NOT THE HADITHA MASSACRE. SEMPER-FI
I replied...
Well, I have an open mind and watched the trailer.
Your film clearly shows Marines killing defenseless civilians with their hands in the air.
Your film clearly shows a massacre against civilians by out-of-control Marines.
Your film is coming out even before the Article 32s will be completed.
You cannot possibly believe it will help the Haditha Marines to release a film showing them killing unarmed civilians.
PS. No one in the Haditha case has copped a plea.
Well please stay pissed, but don’t let it overwhelm you.
Again, Thanks
[Mr] T
This ex-marine who is claiming he “would never” sell-out his fellow marines for 15 minutes of fame, perhaps, was being clever by half.
He would do it for 30.
(If I am mistaken about this film and the Marine-Model, I will apologize.)
No problem.
My old man joined up with the Abraham Lincoln Brigage to fight fascism. He saw the light about commies in Spain, went to England to join the RAF, and switched to the USAAF after Pearl. He finished flying the Hump in Burma in ‘45.
Us Rovers stay the course.
OK - I just watched the trailer. It is disgusting and vile. There is nothing redeeming in the trailer or that reflects positively on the Marines. This “marine” is full of shinola. He willingly participated in a piece of anti-Marine propaganda. He belongs in the same category as Murtha, Kerry and Adam Kokesh.
I guess the film’s defenders (i.e., ex-Marines who are making money from it) tell themselves it’s fair. It does show the pressure the Marines were under just before they committed cold blooded murder.
How fair minded.
I’ve had leftists tell me the same thing. “Murtha didn’t say they were killers,” I’ve been told. “He said they overreacted because of the pressure they were under.” They leave out the “and killed innocent civilians in cold blood” part.
A film like this could have been fair by not showing Iraqis gunned down at the taxi or in the houses. It could have happened off-camera and left the audience to judge.
Calling this movie “positive” is the worst kind of deception.
I’ve sent a link to this thread to all the Haditha Marine attorneys. I don’t suppose anything can be done. But at least people are forewarned.
That trailer made my blood boil, big time. You say the jackass that stars in it dared to go online and suggest he was giving a fair representation - and now he's gonna come HERE?
Wait'll he get's a load of us.....(right after we thank him for his service, of course)
Great post, RedRover.
What kind of sh*t is that? Is there someone I can advise that the logo may be being abused in the promotion of this movie?
I got an e-mail back from Capt McConnell’s lawyer. They are on the case, and I hope something can be done. If I learn more, I’ll let everyone know.
Above, “it saws” = “it says”. (Too tired to type!)
You know Red...there are a few people on FR that I wish I could reach through the computer to give them a great big hug.
You are at the top of that list.
What you do every day and have done each day for our Marines, is nothing short of amazing.
Ditto, bump, yep.
:-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.