Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ShadowAce

You may find this ping-worthy.


2 posted on 06/17/2007 10:47:34 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dayglored
The blogger is a nutrooter. If he cared about ballot integrity you would see something on his cite about the importance of appropriate voter ID at the polling places.

His argument is total BS. Read carefully what MS is proposing. They are saying that if someone builds a voter app to run in their environment that MS doesn't have to release the environment to the government or anyone else for independant review. This would remove the ability for pretty much anyone to get a look at MS's operating system source codes.

IE - if you build a voting machine app using pocket PC software, you still have to release the code - which anyone who knows software can reconstitute on a pocket PC environment and verify it works as it is suppose to.

The developer of the voting machine equipment themselves don't even have access to the environment source. MS is just doing this so that people can use their awesome development tools/environment and compete with those who are not.

3 posted on 06/17/2007 10:59:02 PM PDT by mbraynard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson