Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dingell drops energy bill elements
The Hill ^ | 6/19/2007 | Jim Snyder

Posted on 06/18/2007 11:19:34 PM PDT by bruinbirdman

Unable to resolve a disagreement with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) and other Democrats, Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman John Dingell (D-Mich.) yesterday said he would introduce a revised energy bill that left out the more controversial elements of an earlier proposal.

In a memo sent yesterday at press time to committee members, Dingell said he planned to circulate an energy bill that addressed energy efficiency standards, a “smart” electricity grid, loan guarantees for “innovative” energy technologies and incentives for renewable fuels infrastructure.

Gone from the new draft, however, would be new fuel efficiency standards for cars and trucks and language preventing California and other states from requiring greenhouse gas emissions reductions from tailpipes.

A dozen Democrats on the committee wrote Dingell to express “serious concerns” about the legislation. Pelosi said she in particular opposed the language to preempt California’s greenhouse gas efforts.

But Dingell said Democrats, in essence, were agreeing to disagree on those hot-button issues for now as they move forward on items that have broader support.

“This procedure for considering energy legislation at this time was discussed with the Speaker, and she understands the rationale for proceeding this way so that we can rapidly complete work on a bipartisan bill,” Dingell wrote.

Still, the chairman said the initial bill would include meaningful steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. For example, the new energy efficiency requirements would “remove from the atmosphere carbon dioxide emissions equivalent to those emitted from all cars currently on the road,” the letter stated, quoting estimates from the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy and the Alliance to Save Energy.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 110th; dingell; energy

1 posted on 06/18/2007 11:19:36 PM PDT by bruinbirdman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

On the Senate side, my organization, the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, is supporting the bipartisan Pryor-Bond-Levin-Voinovich amendment. This alternative to the Energy Bill, while tough and aggressive, represents achievable mandatory fuel economy standards, raising them by more than 30 percent. Specifically, it calls for a mandatory 30 percent ramp up of fuel economy standards to at least 36 mpg for cars by 2022 and at least 30 mpg for trucks by 2025.

Additionally, the amendment increases R&D funding for advanced batteries, plug-in hybrids, clean diesel, diesel hybrids and flex fuel hybrids, as well as hydrogen storage and fuel cell technology – the best ways to reduce carbon emissions and our dependence on foreign oil.

There are more details at our website, http://www.drivecongress.com/


2 posted on 06/19/2007 7:54:21 AM PDT by Tutle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson