Then none of the sources referenced can be taken as anything other than singular instances. You're arguing that they're establishing a "logical consistency" based on "chance and continuous change".
We're being asked to accept the proposition that America cannot survive Evolutionary Humanism, without any clear definition of exactly what that is. It appears that the only "safe" conclusion to be reached is that it is a matter of national security that we get rid of all the evolutionists.
tactical...You’re arguing that they’re establishing a “logical consistency” based on “chance and continuous change”.
Irish...Absolutely! And here’s the catch tactical...there’s not supposed to be anything ‘logical’ about a ‘chance and continuous change’ system-—yet there it is. And why? Because evolutionary humanism is a phantasmagoria of massive narcissism, fantasy, deception, outright lies, delusion, wishful thinking, imagination-gone-wild, and hypocrisy.
Although for the wrong reason, you did finally see it. Congratulations.