Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman

Is that your tactic now, ignore the body and focus on the least important part of the article (”Other Possible Carbon 14 Dating Problems”)? Do you want to focus on the “possibilities” section or the section dealing with the known science? I’m waiting...

PS Talk about quote mining!


136 posted on 06/21/2007 5:30:29 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: GodGunsGuts
Is that your tactic now, ignore the body and focus on the least important part of the article (”Other Possible Carbon 14 Dating Problems”)? Do you want to focus on the “possibilities” section or the section dealing with the known science? I’m waiting...

Those mistakes illustrate the quality of the research. Those types of mistakes, indeed some of those very same mistakes, appear in article after article written by creationists. They are supposed to show problems with the radiocarbon method, but they show the shoddy research of creation "scientists" instead.

I am working on researching more of the creationists' claims regarding radiocarbon dating, but I have some other things to do which are more important.

137 posted on 06/21/2007 5:54:56 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson