Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HILLARY CLINTON ENGAGED IN FELONIES CAUGHT ONVIDEO SUBMITTED FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW IN CALIFORNIA
usfj ^ | 6-21-07 | United States Justice Foundation

Posted on 06/21/2007 12:30:17 PM PDT by doug from upland

USJF United States Justice Foundation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT PERSON: COLETTE WILSON(760) 580 0561

filings on www.hillcap.org

HILLARY CLINTON ENGAGED IN FELONIES CAUGHT ON VIDEO SUBMITTED FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW IN CALIFORNIA

Los Angeles: June 21, 2007
The UNITED STATES JUSTICE FOUNDATION (USJF) today filed a REPLY BRIEF in response to HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON'S REPLY in the Appeal of Peter F. Paul in Paul v Clinton et al , seeking reversal of an order granting CLINTON First Amendment protection for her illegal campaign solicitations under California's anti-SLAPP law. The REPLY BRIEF was filed with the California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District Court, in Los Angeles County, California, in the case of PAUL v. CLINTON, et al., Case No. BC304174. In addition, USJF filed a Motion to Admit New Evidence comprising a DVD containing a five minute video taped phone conversation initiated by HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON to Peter F. Paul, joined by Spider Man creator Stan Lee, on July 17, 2000. Because the incriminating tape was held since May, 2001 and only just released on April 12, 2007 by the office of the U.S.Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, after the Appeal was begun, the Motion to admit this newly obtained evidence was required According to USJF Lead Attorney in the case, D. COLETTE WILSON, of Escondido, California, “The Clinton Reply Brief to our Opening Brief failed to address the substance of any of the allegations that have been made by Peter Paul against defendant Hillary Clinton.

Unfortunately, Clinton's trademark use of character assassination to hide from the cold hard evidence of her misconduct provides the sole basis of the Clinton defense. With the recent release of the smoking gun video of Hillary Clinton's phone call to Peter Paul only days after Paul was advised by President Clinton to fund and produce Hillary Clinton's largest fundraiser as part of a post White House employment package with President Clinton, there can no longer be any doubt of Hillary Clintons knowledge and personal involvement in obtaining and directing the largest illegal campaign contribution ever linked to a federal candidate. It is truly ironic that Hillary Clinton's counsel, in a desperate effort to remove her as a defendant in this case, have subjected her illegal conduct to judicial review for the first time in her career, something she has avoided through numerous grand jury investigations directed at her misconduct since she entered the White House in 1992."

Election Law expert John Armor, who has represented presidential candidates from Eugene McCarthy to John Anderson, declared after reviewing the tape, “This videotape proves that Hillary Clinton was fully involved in this fund-raiser. It also proves that she committed at least two clear felonies under the campaign finance laws. Worst of all, this evidence was withheld by Hillary Clinton from both the court, the Grand Jury and the FEC for five years, effectively thwarting all federal investigations.” USJF is a non-profit legal action foundation, now headquartered in Ramona, California. Since its founding in 1979.

For information See www.hillcap.org contact USJF at 760-788-6624,


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: hillary; hillaryscandals; peterpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-130 next last
The Appellate brief has now been filed. We expect that by September the Appellate Court will determine if Hillary is brought back into Paul v Clinton as a defendant. In any case, she will be under oath in deposition this year. The heat will be turned up, and we will try to make the witch melt.
1 posted on 06/21/2007 12:30:19 PM PDT by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Thanks for the info, Doug!


2 posted on 06/21/2007 12:32:33 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Ping.


3 posted on 06/21/2007 12:32:44 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KylaStarr; Cindy; StillProud2BeFree; nw_arizona_granny; Velveeta; Dolphy; appalachian_dweller; ...

ping


4 posted on 06/21/2007 12:34:04 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

“This videotape proves that Hillary Clinton was fully involved in this fund-raiser. It also proves that she committed at least two clear felonies under the campaign finance laws. Worst of all, this evidence was withheld by Hillary Clinton from both the court, the Grand Jury and the FEC for five years”

This outta be good!


5 posted on 06/21/2007 12:34:54 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Oooh need popcorn!


6 posted on 06/21/2007 12:36:09 PM PDT by Domandred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

And what the media will report.....

(((((Crickets chirping)))))


7 posted on 06/21/2007 12:36:13 PM PDT by Lucky9teen (Those that fail to learn from history, are doomed to repeat it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

EXACTLY what does the 5 minutes contain? I appreciate yoru diligence doug, but it seems each time one of these “gotcha” style threads appears, there’s little proof in the pudding.


8 posted on 06/21/2007 12:37:00 PM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
9 posted on 06/21/2007 12:37:55 PM PDT by rbosque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

What a world, what a world, who would have thought a little Freeper like you you spoil my beautiful wickedness. Melting........melting........I’m almost gone.......


10 posted on 06/21/2007 12:38:27 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen

I have met in person with journalists for a major newspaper and a very well know magazine journalist from DC. Let’s see if they do the story.


11 posted on 06/21/2007 12:41:36 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Hope so. I am tempted to say “this too will pass” but I hope not this time.


12 posted on 06/21/2007 12:42:05 PM PDT by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Teflon.

The more dirt that is uncovered regarding Hillary! the harder the DBM will try to sell her to the sheeple.


13 posted on 06/21/2007 12:43:09 PM PDT by brownsfan (America has "jumped the shark")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

I’ve been hearing this stuff for well over ten years.

I’ll believe it when I see it.


14 posted on 06/21/2007 12:43:20 PM PDT by mgstarr (KZ-6090 Smith W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rbosque
LOL! That pic freaks me out whenever I see it.

Unfortunately, considering all the illegal allegations the Clintons managed to slither out of, this probably won't amount to much.

15 posted on 06/21/2007 12:43:26 PM PDT by Recovering Hermit (There's another old saying Senator..."Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Still, no controlling legal authority.
16 posted on 06/21/2007 12:44:02 PM PDT by CobraJet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

“I give the DA credit for getting THAT much. I tell you, this guy is protected from on high by the Prince of Darkness. Take my word for it.”
-Dan Hedaya’s character from the movie, “The Usual Suspects”


17 posted on 06/21/2007 12:44:29 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

bttt


18 posted on 06/21/2007 12:45:17 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

No doubt she is a sleaze but is this going to go anywhere?


19 posted on 06/21/2007 12:46:37 PM PDT by honestfreedom69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Here’s hoping something finally sticks. btw, did your shift key get stuck in the down position while you were typing some of this?


20 posted on 06/21/2007 12:48:00 PM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Peter - Paul? The band or the guys that make candy.


21 posted on 06/21/2007 12:48:26 PM PDT by Fawn (If it wasn't for FR, I'd be having an Existential MELTDOWN..............right now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

You will see the five minutes on Tuesday. You will see Hillary commenting on the fundraiser and admitting being fully briefed by Kelly Craighead, head of her advance team. You will hear her thank Peter Paul and Stan Lee and offer her help. She will thank them for the fundraiser FOR HER, NOT FOR A SOFT-MONEY COMMITTEE. Kelly Craighead had participated in an earlier conference call and solicited Peter for the donation. Craighead has never been called by the FEC, by the prosecutor in the Rosen trial, or by the Senate Ethics Committee.

The bottom line is that Hillary’s knowledge, participation, solicitation, and coordination made the over $1.6 mil paid by Peter AN ILLEGAL DONATION FROM THE BEGINNING. The federal limit was $2,000.

One of most insidious parts of this story is that an assistant US Attorney withheld this information during investigations. He even tried to withhold it four weeks ago by not sending it along with the rest of Peter’s tapes he was holding from Peter’s case. Because it was on the list as being in their possession, however, he had no choice but to finally give it to Peter.

When will Obama or Edwards have the courage to use this info. She has her smear team working day and night going after Obama.


22 posted on 06/21/2007 12:48:42 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: theDentist; doug from upland

I agree, unless there is some proffed pudding ... it all means nothing. Especially in a Calif. court room with a high profile Celeb!


23 posted on 06/21/2007 12:49:18 PM PDT by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
In the meantime, you can have some fun with this:

Slap Hillary

24 posted on 06/21/2007 12:49:36 PM PDT by Sicon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Gee, if she’s charged with a felony, wouldn’t that keep her busy for the next year or so defending her position. And withholding all this stuff is kind of like obstruction of justice, isn’t it?

But if she managed to get herself kicked out of the senate as a convicted felon, wouldn’t that also mean that Harry Reid would have to go looking for a new job too?

Oh, silly me. I jump too fast.


25 posted on 06/21/2007 12:52:56 PM PDT by janereinheimer ((I can do all things through Him who strengthens me.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Which assistant US Attorney?


26 posted on 06/21/2007 12:53:06 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

keep up the good work, but I can’t help being skeptical. The Clintons have gotten away with rape, murder, and treason. I doubt fund-raising will be their downfall.


27 posted on 06/21/2007 12:54:20 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
As much as I would like to think Hillary will get caught in this fund raising scam, the Clintons have an uncanny ability to lie their way out situations that would have sent most of us to jail. However, Hillary is not the consummate liar that Bill is and has a seething temper. She maybe could skate by with I don’t remember in the White Water scam, but as a Presidential candidate there are others in the Democrat party who would love to see her caught in this and may keep the heat turned up.
28 posted on 06/21/2007 12:54:35 PM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Could it be? A Clinton (not Roger!) behind bars?!? LOL.


29 posted on 06/21/2007 12:55:28 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expatpat

I have to be careful about naming that name for awhile.


30 posted on 06/21/2007 12:55:40 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Hermit

Unfortunately, you’re probably right.


31 posted on 06/21/2007 12:55:51 PM PDT by rbosque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Woo hoo!

Pound a stake into the witch’s heart!


32 posted on 06/21/2007 12:56:21 PM PDT by roaddog727 (BS does not get bridges built)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

The press release title was in caps, so that’s how I posted it.


33 posted on 06/21/2007 12:56:37 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Are you going to be involved in the deposition?


34 posted on 06/21/2007 12:56:44 PM PDT by IncPen (The Liberal's Reward is Self Disgust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

good. looking fwd to it. maybe ‘bama will have the stones to use it, but i’d not hold my breath...


35 posted on 06/21/2007 12:57:03 PM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Here’s hoping, Doug, but I figure her greasy piggedness will win out again. She and Billyjeff seem to be untouchable. I can still hope, though.
36 posted on 06/21/2007 12:58:56 PM PDT by badgerlandjim (Hillary Clinton is to politics as Helen Thomas is to beauty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

bump for later reading


37 posted on 06/21/2007 1:13:56 PM PDT by Kevmo (We need to get away from the Kennedy Wing of the Republican Party ~Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus
keep up the good work, but I can’t help being skeptical. The Clintons have gotten away with rape, murder, and treason. I doubt fund-raising will be their downfall.

Well, the Feds used "tax evasion" to bring down the mob (Al Capone). So you never know... Sometimes it's the little things that get you in the end.

Not that illegal campaign contributions and obstruction of justice are little things, but they may be in Clintonland.
38 posted on 06/21/2007 1:15:51 PM PDT by khnyny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

Obama’s hoping for VP. You won’t hear a peep.


39 posted on 06/21/2007 1:17:44 PM PDT by khnyny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus
I doubt fund-raising will be their downfall.

Oh, I dunno. They got Capone for Tax Evasion.

I don't particularly care which of the many, many charges apply. So long as one of them sticks.

40 posted on 06/21/2007 1:18:22 PM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I have met in person with journalists for a major newspaper and a very well know magazine journalist from DC. Let’s see if they do the story.

Go Doug!! You're my hero.

41 posted on 06/21/2007 1:18:22 PM PDT by BipolarBob (Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I didn't see it in my rear view mirror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland; All

E-Mail the “vast, right-wing conspiracy” of talk radio, lol.

On another note, a story which is not getting any coverage at all today -

Pentagon Email Hacked Thursday
Thursday, June 21, 2007 - FreeMarketNews.com

The Pentagon confirmed that its e-mail system was hacked, CNN reported Thursday afternoon. “Here at the Pentagon, officials are confirming that they’ve been hacked,” a CNN news anchor reported. “It’s actually a fairly serious matter.” The report continued, “About one third of the computer users here in the Pentagon that work for Defense Secretary Robert Gates had their email system penetrated.” According to CNN, the Pentagon’s computer server was taken off line on Wednesday, along with the email server. -Raw Story


42 posted on 06/21/2007 1:22:21 PM PDT by khnyny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: khnyny

yes, but I wonder if she’ll choose him. he’s too strong for her taste, and may take some of her spotlight.


43 posted on 06/21/2007 1:24:53 PM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Good work Doug...you are a bulldog.

Who IYO, if any...could be bot off? IOW, are there any weak links?

You and I both know....the Clinton's have "friends" in many places.

Nothing would surprise me with these folks.....

44 posted on 06/21/2007 1:26:59 PM PDT by Osage Orange (The old/liberal/socialist media is the most ruthless and destructive enemy of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: khnyny
But that was in the day...of when right meant right....and wrong meant wrong.

Not sure those rules apply today.....

45 posted on 06/21/2007 1:28:57 PM PDT by Osage Orange (Getting honest answers from Congress...is like putting socks on roosters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: khnyny
According to CNN, the Pentagon’s computer server was taken off line on Wednesday, along with the email server. -Raw Story

I love journalists.

How many thousands of people work at the Pentagon? 10's of thousands? And "the computer server" was "taken offline". Along with the "email server". Yup. They just done walked up and pulled out the plug.

For an operation like the Pentagon, it wouldn't suprise me if there are thousands of servers, and dozens of EMail servers. Heck, I work for a tiny company and we alone have four email servers.

46 posted on 06/21/2007 1:29:12 PM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: mgstarr

Her reply when questioned will be “Asked and Answered”..I’ll be shocked if we ever hear of this again.


47 posted on 06/21/2007 1:30:35 PM PDT by bestrongbpositive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

I don’t know - Obama doesn’t seem particularly “strong” to me, he seems young and inexperienced. Besides, Hillary’s used to being in the shadow of Bill, so she’s accustomed to dealing with charismatic characters. We all know that’s what she lacks - charisma, warmth, etc., so she might see bama as an asset in that dept.


48 posted on 06/21/2007 1:30:59 PM PDT by khnyny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus; doug from upland
keep up the good work, but I can’t help being skeptical. The Clintons have gotten away with rape, murder, and treason. I doubt fund-raising will be their downfall.

They got Al Capone on tax evasion, so maybe fundraising will throw a rod in the Clinton machine. Lord, I hope something finally sticks to that black pantsuited monstrocity...

49 posted on 06/21/2007 1:34:17 PM PDT by TheSpottedOwl (Head Caterer for the FIRM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: wbill

Yes. Perhaps they’re trying to downplay this incident, if not, then the reporters are just stupid. 1/3 is a lot. Imho, not good.


50 posted on 06/21/2007 1:34:56 PM PDT by khnyny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson