Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: garjog
You seem to be saying that it is irrelevant whether or not Saddam had WMD. Yes, that may be true.

Irrelevant if he had "stockpiles" of WMDs. Reality is many WMDs can be quickly produced and have a rather short shelf-life (the idea of keeping large stockpiles really never made much sense....especially considering the quasi monitoring that was going on over him)

But, it would be outrageously ironic if it turns out that in fact Saddam did have them. And, the thesis of these articles seem persuasive. It makes sense that he did have them and that they were moved. That is something logical that the terrorists would do.

Again, the Russian's simply aren't as competent as these articles suggest......

10 posted on 06/22/2007 6:29:39 AM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: DevSix

” Again, the Russian’s simply aren’t as competent as these articles suggest......”

Based on WHAT...???

I suggest you read “The Bioweaponeers” for starters as well as REALIZING that there’s no evidence that the Russkis had ever STOPPED producing and developing Bio-Chemical Weapons, such as recombinant DNA “lab species” of incurable diseases for which there are NO known antidotes.

http://cryptome.org/bioweap.htm

Plenty MORE evidence here:

http://www.freedominion.ca/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=14573


11 posted on 06/22/2007 8:46:34 AM PDT by JB in Whitefish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson