Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DFU PRESENTS - Hillary Clinton Felonies Caught on Tape is now on YouTube - send it everywhere!
you tube dot com ^ | 6-22-07 | dfu

Posted on 06/22/2007 5:23:59 PM PDT by doug from upland

THIS TAPE IS EVIDENCE OF CAMPAIGN FINANCE FRAUD

Clear evidence is now available for all to see. Hillary Clinton and her agents solicited, participated, and coordinated an illegal hard money, in-kind, $1.6 million donation from Peter Paul.

For six years, her attorney, spokesholes, and hired political thugs have denied that she did anything wrong. David Kendall has been saying she fully cooperated. That is simply not true. To the best of our knowledge neither she nor Kelly Craighead has testified before the FEC. Neither of them was called in the David Rosen criminal case. That case was a sham with a presiding judge who was a Clinton appointee.

Finally, we are getting closer and closer to the magic day when Hillary is going to have to raise her right hand and be grilled by someone who will not be as meek and mild as Ken Starr.

I was in the courtroom of Judge Aurelio Munoz in Los Angeles Superior Court on April 7, 2006. Kendall produced Hillary's sworn declaration that I have labeled as a work of fiction.

In that declaration, however, Hillary made one gigantic error. She accidentally told the truth when she said:

"In the summer of 2000, I knew Mr. Gary Smith and believed his work to be professional and of very high quality. I remember that he was asked to produce a fundraising event for my Senate campaign, which was held on August 12, 2000."

"For my Senate campaign." She did not say it was for her joint fundraising committee, which might have had some wiggle room as a soft money contribution. This was hard money and illegal from the outset.

Peter Paul's attorney fought for two years to have this and other of Peter's tapes released that were being held by a U.S. Attorney. Because it was withheld, the evidence was not available in the trial of David Rosen, in the FEC investigations, or in the Senate Ethics Committee that cleared her of wrongdoing.

We need your help to get this in the hands of journalists. Please make comments on the YouTube thread and make sure everyone on your email list sees it.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: clinton; democrats; felony; hillary; hillaryscandals; peterpaul; ratcrime
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-172 next last
To: doug from upland
I admire your perserverance and its starting to pay off.

Didn't I see this story posted on a CBS web site?

101 posted on 06/22/2007 10:14:18 PM PDT by mcenedo (lying liberal media - our most dangerous and powerful enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcenedo

If you saw this on a CBS site, I’d like to know about it.


102 posted on 06/22/2007 10:26:40 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

bttt


103 posted on 06/22/2007 10:30:25 PM PDT by GOPJ (Banks must print illegal counterfeit to make profit? Kennedy/Bush would try to make it legal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

BTTT


104 posted on 06/23/2007 5:26:32 AM PDT by bazbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
Good to hear from you. As you can see, others have picked up your torch of assembling facts, facts, and more facts to keep the second Clinton out of the White House.

Congressman Billybob

Latest article, "Duke is Not Off the Hook"

105 posted on 06/23/2007 5:30:34 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Please visit www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

excellent and infuriating....stay safe


106 posted on 06/23/2007 5:55:46 AM PDT by razbinn (I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America,and to the republic for which it ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoLightly

“Hard money is under direct control of a candidate, while soft money is not & can not be.”

Thanks for the explanation. I’m not trying to be dense here but this story won’t grow legs unless someone can explain to the average voter how and why this was a crime.

I think the thing that may be causing the confusion is this: what makes the money from that particular gala event “soft” money?

Politicians have these kinds of events all the time, they have $2,000 a plate luncheons and all sorts of events to raise money. To people who don’t understand any of this fund-raising stuff it looks like this event included the same sort of legal fund-raising with Hollyweird types that goes on all the time.


107 posted on 06/23/2007 6:12:57 AM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

“Apparently, everyone has just accepted that Katie is going to be flushed down the toilet, and nothing can save her.”

Maybe. I think it’s more a case of, Katie would rather die a low-ratings death than report real news that would hurt Hitlary.


108 posted on 06/23/2007 6:40:31 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom! Non-Sequitur = Pee Wee Herman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

That was actually the first question that popped in my mind. The second was, is there a reason she can’t still be prosecuted? Double jeopardy?


109 posted on 06/23/2007 6:43:22 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom! Non-Sequitur = Pee Wee Herman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Hey, John. Would you mind giving your take on whether Kankles can be charged? Will there be any legal ramifications? It just kills me that she might get away with it. Sort of like Nifong getting away with it, if that had happened.


110 posted on 06/23/2007 6:46:11 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom! Non-Sequitur = Pee Wee Herman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Nice work Doug, unfortunately if Reagan was Teflon, the Clintoons are titanium.
111 posted on 06/23/2007 6:47:18 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ ("Courage is when you are scared to death, saddle up and ride out anyway." John F'in Wayne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
I am already on record, as are many others, that Clinton (her) will not be charged with any crimes. Most of the crimes shown by this tape are already beyond the statute of limitations. And any that aren't will be allowed to expire.

The only damage that this situation will do is political -- over and above whatever money damages Peter Paul can collect from the case itself, but that won't dent the Clintons' bankroll. The optimistic side is that Clinton (her) is up against a negative view by nearly half of the population, per the recent polls.

The events in this instance may be enough to push her over the tipping point that she cannot now, and cannot ever, be elected President. It is as if it takes not just one Chappaquiddick, but a series of them, to bury finally and for all time the ambitions of the Clintons, just like the original Chappaquiddick buried the presidential ambitions of Ted Kennedy.

Let's hope that is the outcome.

Congressman Billybob

Latest article, "Duke is Not Off the Hook"

112 posted on 06/23/2007 7:03:32 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Please visit www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Thanks. Too bad, really. But perhaps good enough. I can see Hillary winning the national election as Dick Morris would argue. I just can’t see BO or Silky Pony winning.

But, I say that not yet knowing who the GOPers will nominate. Who knows how bad they’ll screw up.


113 posted on 06/23/2007 7:14:27 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom! Non-Sequitur = Pee Wee Herman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

John, in January of 2006, she had her treasurer file a fourth false report after being fined by the FEC and told to report correctly. No statute of limitations there. I know the candidate doesn’t do the report, but she certainly knew the facts at that point and let him file a false one.

Whether this can be proved is another matter, but in her lying declaration, she claims to know nothing of her husband’s plan to work for Stan Lee Media. Of course, Chelsea is going to commit perjury because it is genetic, but Chelsea said before witnesses at Streisand’s the next day that they stayed up late playing Scrabble and discussing how exciting it was for daddy to be going to work for the creator of Spider Man.


114 posted on 06/23/2007 7:18:27 AM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Very nice..... Has she seen this?


115 posted on 06/23/2007 7:26:53 AM PDT by b4its2late (Liberalism is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
You’re right that criminal liability for the NEW false FEC report is theoretically possible. First is to get the FEC even to acknowledge CIVIL liability for the latest, false statement. Civil first; if that’s accomplished, then criminal after. (Still as likely as finding a full set of hen’d teeth.)

John / Billybob

116 posted on 06/23/2007 7:28:07 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Please visit www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: webstersII
I think the thing that may be causing the confusion is this: what makes the money from that particular gala event “soft” money?

The seed money in this case wasn't soft money, because Hillary's campaign coordinated with those who spent over a million on her behalf & the proceeds went into a fund under her direct control.

Politicians have these kinds of events all the time, they have $2,000 a plate luncheons and all sorts of events to raise money.

Right, they do & the proceeds are hard money if they go into a fund under control of the candidate. The $2000 a pop aren't the problem, the seed monies are. If the funding of the event, the money spent up front comes out of the candidate's fund or if the one who spent the seed money is reimbursed, there's no problem.

The money spent to put Hillary's gala together was a hard money contribution, well over the $2000 limit. Not only was it a hard money expenditure, but Hillary & her campaign were caught working with those doing it on her behalf (proof is in the video).

To people who don’t understand any of this fund-raising stuff it looks like this event included the same sort of legal fund-raising with Hollyweird types that goes on all the time.

The stuff that goes on behind the scenes is what makes the difference between a legal versus illegal contribution.

117 posted on 06/23/2007 7:32:03 AM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

I completely agree with your assessment that she will never be convicted of anything. Dave Schippers has said that it would be professional suicide for any prosecutor who tried it. We only need a small percentage of the population to see the truth so that she becomes so radioactive she can’t be nominated.


118 posted on 06/23/2007 7:33:06 AM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Bobkk47

bump


119 posted on 06/23/2007 7:34:00 AM PDT by Dadofmany
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GoLightly

In 2000, the max hard money contribution was $2,000, which would have been $1000 each for primary and general election. The tickets to the concert were $1,000. That was not just a number pulled from the air.


120 posted on 06/23/2007 8:03:49 AM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: All
APRIL 7, 2006 DECLARATION

"In the summer of 2000, I knew Mr. Gary Smith and believed his work to be professional and of very high quality. I remember that he was asked to produce a fundraising event for my Senate campaign, which was held on August 12, 2000."

121 posted on 06/23/2007 8:06:28 AM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken21

RE: hopefully hillary’s campaign will implode.

That can only happen if the press writes about this. Your help in passing it along will be appreciated.


122 posted on 06/23/2007 8:07:35 AM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Excellent job. Why this was not entered into evidence makes no sense. I hope this gets the proper exposure. I rated it excellent!


123 posted on 06/23/2007 8:26:42 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Whatever you sell it for, it’s truly taking $ from suckers. Good L-rd, that book on some schmuck’s coffee table makes me sick.


124 posted on 06/23/2007 8:30:45 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

She’s trying to claim that a soft money contribution was used to generate hard monies. You got the goods on her Doug. Hope it gets the traction is deserves.


125 posted on 06/23/2007 8:34:01 AM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: GoLightly

Participation, solicitation, coordination. It was hard money and illegal from the outset. They took the position it was soft money, but even then they failed to declare $721,000. The fact that a US Atty kept this evidence while official investigations were ongoing needs to be examined. An Clintonista apparently did her a favor.


126 posted on 06/23/2007 8:38:53 AM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

It does make sense. Someone in the US atty office was helping cover her butt.


127 posted on 06/23/2007 8:39:55 AM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

Um, it’s not on my coffee table, but I’m the schmuck who has that book. Peter gave it to me. I also have a canvas seat back from the director chairs used at the event. It is one of about five signed by Clinton. I’d let my dogs pee on it but it might be worth some money to a Clinton sick-o-fant.


128 posted on 06/23/2007 8:41:54 AM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Bobkk47

You are right, nothing here, move on.


129 posted on 06/23/2007 8:47:15 AM PDT by sweetiepiezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I just do not understand the campaign finance laws to understand what is wrong with this video. I am novice in this area at best. Nevertheless, I believe this is the smoking gun. Although I do not understand it.
130 posted on 06/23/2007 8:51:26 AM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518

If a candidate directly solicits money for her own campaign, the federal limit is $2,000 from any individual. She had claimed all along that Peter’s $1.6 mil was for the joint fundraising committee. That simply wasn’t the case. She participated, solicited, and coordinated this donation for her senate campaign.


131 posted on 06/23/2007 8:57:59 AM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: The Spirit Of Allegiance

Very nice! Have sent on to various media. Have also visited and watched the YouTube video! Let’s just pray.


132 posted on 06/23/2007 9:08:26 AM PDT by getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL (****************************Stop Continental Drift**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: sweetiepiezer; Calpernia; backhoe; Rushmore Rocks; WestCoastGal; Froufrou

Thank you, sweetiepiezer.

Ping to # 6.


133 posted on 06/23/2007 9:18:46 AM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sweetiepiezer; Calpernia; backhoe; Rushmore Rocks; WestCoastGal; Froufrou; potlatch; Smartass; ...

Sorry, second try-Ping to # 17.


134 posted on 06/23/2007 9:25:07 AM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

The MSM will declare this as ‘old news’ and is only being kept alive by ‘mean-spirited’ Republicans.


135 posted on 06/23/2007 9:43:51 AM PDT by blam (Secure the border then, Introduce an Illegal Immigrant Deportation Bill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: danamco
When it comes to the clintoons, you just need to know 3 words: teflon, Teflon, T E F L O N !!!

But how do you explain the Teflon? Isn't it obvious?

136 posted on 06/23/2007 10:37:01 AM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Would be really great if the Clintons for once in their lives would have to pay the piper.


137 posted on 06/23/2007 10:50:17 AM PDT by Dustbunny (The BIBLE - Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoLightly
She's trying to claim that a soft money contribution was used to generate hard monies.

And by persisting in that fiction, she was able to have a lot more cash on hand for the critical homestretch of her 2000 Senate campaign. That extra cash allowed her to purchase more advertising which helped her immensely in pulling away from her opponent Rick Lazio and turning a close race into a decisive win.

138 posted on 06/23/2007 10:57:39 AM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

TANKS for the ping Lu,,,


139 posted on 06/23/2007 11:31:56 AM PDT by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93
But how do you explain the Teflon? Isn't it obvious?

MSM, LSM,or Drive-by-Media!??!

140 posted on 06/23/2007 12:17:12 PM PDT by danamco (Now, I would LOVE to hear your solution as to how to remove 12 to 30 million people from this countr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: danamco

Yes, that’s true. But the Teflon is reinforced by their mob connections!


141 posted on 06/23/2007 12:20:14 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

That video was just dripping with insincerity and BS.

I feel sick.


142 posted on 06/23/2007 12:30:52 PM PDT by rbosque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

si.


143 posted on 06/23/2007 1:53:27 PM PDT by ken21 (tv: 1. sells products. 2. indoctrinates viewers into socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: All

How many of you also realize there is IRS fraud here?


144 posted on 06/23/2007 4:17:30 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

“Rosen was part of the conference call on July 11 in which Peter was solicited and the cost was discussed as over a million dollars. Rosen didn’t know? My butt......”

Doug...so when does Rosen get hauled up for perjury?


145 posted on 06/23/2007 6:41:23 PM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mo

I have given the info to the Justice Department. Unfortunately, it is the Bush Justice Department. When we get Rosen under oath, it is going to be interesting. The last day of testimony, I saw him lying his butt off up on the stand.


146 posted on 06/23/2007 9:03:54 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

Comment #147 Removed by Moderator

To: Congressman Billybob

I’m thrilled about it! Hugs!


148 posted on 06/23/2007 10:02:45 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

Thanks. I didn’t know of OrbusMax.


149 posted on 06/23/2007 10:08:52 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

Three weeks ago I met in person with a very well-known journalist for a news magazine. A week ago, I met with a journalist for a major newspaper. If they spike it and don’t do the stories, I will name names.


150 posted on 06/23/2007 10:11:54 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-172 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson