Skip to comments.
A new pronoun? What's a hu to do?
Gender-neutral terms spur bruising debate
St. Paul Pioneer Press
| 06/23/2007
| WILLIAM WEIR
Posted on 06/24/2007 2:29:33 PM PDT by rhema
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
To: rhema
“Folks in the transgender community have long charged that “he” or “she” forces them into categories they don’t necessarily identify with. “
Those folks have a mental disorder. We are being preached to about giving the mentally ill preference when we use the English language. That makes US insane as well.
PC should take it’s rightful place, well hidden behind that huge rock, where all lies hide, never to be bowed to or spoken again.
41
posted on
06/24/2007 3:18:40 PM PDT
by
gidget7
( Vote for the Arsenal of Democracy, because America RUNS on Duncan!)
To: jude24
I really wanted to say, "Ma'am, I'm sorry the English language offends you, but I see no reason to change a thousand years of the King's English to placate your sensibilities." Because we were trying to sell our proposal, I instead said "I'm sorry. I'll be more clear. 'He or she'." If you'd followed the anthropomorphic he with a reference to the King's English, you'd probably still be doing hard time.
42
posted on
06/24/2007 3:19:47 PM PDT
by
rhema
("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
To: rhema; Let's Roll
Sounds like something from Dr. Seuss. Right: Horton hears a Hu Sure does....and it would sound ridiculous using it in prose, or any other normal communication.
43
posted on
06/24/2007 3:20:14 PM PDT
by
nicmarlo
To: rhema
44
posted on
06/24/2007 3:23:21 PM PDT
by
savedbygrace
(SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
To: Billthedrill
That community is most notable for the innovative use of things other than pronouns. In any case human beings do not have "genders." Words have genders. Human beings have sexes. Vive la Différence. Wryly and elegantly stated!
45
posted on
06/24/2007 3:23:21 PM PDT
by
rhema
("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
To: Zack Attack; savedbygrace
What will all the hus down in hu-ville do? Hus on first?
I'm perpetually thankful for the winsome and witty FReeper community.
46
posted on
06/24/2007 3:28:36 PM PDT
by
rhema
("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
To: rhema
You’ll let me know when this is settled.
47
posted on
06/24/2007 3:32:26 PM PDT
by
razorback-bert
(Posted by Time's Man of the Year)
To: nicmarlo
Sure does....and it would sound ridiculous using it in prose, or any other normal communication.
As distinguished from the mutually exclusive category of academic communication.
48
posted on
06/24/2007 3:34:29 PM PDT
by
rhema
("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
To: rhema
"The idea is just to communicate."
The idea is to control people by bastardizing the language. I know because I asked the mailman the last time she came by...
49
posted on
06/24/2007 3:38:13 PM PDT
by
rockrr
(09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0)
To: razorback-bert
Youll let me know when this is settled. I think it's irrevocably settled on this forum. Of course, we may all be targeted for language internment camps if the loony-left academics get their way.
50
posted on
06/24/2007 3:40:14 PM PDT
by
rhema
("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
To: rhema
Everyone:
In case I spontaneously break into Spanish this evening, may I use the familiar ‘tu’ form with you?
Silly
51
posted on
06/24/2007 3:40:42 PM PDT
by
Silly
(Hillary has been overheard praying to Lady Elaine Fairchilde, alcoholic puppet)
To: RightWhale
Why do we need a gender-neutral personal pronoun? We don’t have any gender-neutral people. Has the world gone completely mad?
52
posted on
06/24/2007 3:52:14 PM PDT
by
abclily
To: rhema
But to modern ears, using "he" across the board sounds more jarring than "they." Whoa!
I zinger in the argument. Obviously, if I still prefer "he" I am by definition not modern.
Pity. I may need to start looking into Ambien.
Alas, modern man. what is he to do?
Now, where are those socks I need to sort?
53
posted on
06/24/2007 3:54:29 PM PDT
by
Publius6961
(MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
To: rhema
[cue Roger Daltrey and the fellas:]
“Hu are you? Hu, hu? Hu, hu?”
54
posted on
06/24/2007 3:55:32 PM PDT
by
RichInOC
(No! BAD Rich!)
To: hsalaw
Im a woman, but I still use he as the universal pronoun.Well, welcome to our "un-modern" ears outcast group.
*sniff*
55
posted on
06/24/2007 3:56:21 PM PDT
by
Publius6961
(MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
To: dufekin
We also use it to refer to nonliving things, entities without gender, asexually reproducing organisms, hermaphrodites, and animals of unknown or irrelevant gender.There you go; you found the ideal compromise.
I shan't elaborate in deference to the trolls who are in love with the abuse button, and the mods who empower them...
56
posted on
06/24/2007 4:00:06 PM PDT
by
Publius6961
(MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
To: Publius6961
Alas, modern man. what is he to do? Grammatically emasculate huself for the good of the cause?
57
posted on
06/24/2007 4:00:38 PM PDT
by
rhema
("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
To: abclily
No, not the world. Only a few individuals of limited power and utility.
58
posted on
06/24/2007 4:00:53 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Treaty)
To: SAJ
They do?? OK, mia hermano, whatever you say. That would be mi hermano or mi hermana, no distinction.
However, voy con ella and voy con el" have obvious and definite genders...
A little learning is a dangerous thing.
59
posted on
06/24/2007 4:02:20 PM PDT
by
Publius6961
(MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
To: RichInOC
[cue Roger Daltrey and the fellas:] Hu are you? Hu, hu? Hu, hu? Thanks for expanding my grammar horizons. I was thinking of hu strictly as a personal pronoun. You've discovered a use for it as an interrogative pronoun.
60
posted on
06/24/2007 4:04:22 PM PDT
by
rhema
("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson