Skip to comments.Helen Thomas: 'Reagan Diaries' Make For Must-Read Fare
Posted on 06/25/2007 12:48:45 PM PDT by seanmerc
Read the newly published "The Reagan Diaries" if you want a true insight into the mind of the nation's 40th president.
The diaries -- written daily from 1981 until President Ronald Reagan left office in 1989 -- reveal him to be much more involved in the nitty gritty of national and world affairs than many White House reporters thought. He had often been portrayed as a detached, "chairman of the board" kind of president.
The diaries show that Reagan had something to say about everything and everybody; his thoughts were often summarized in one handwritten sentence. His notations mixed the profound with the trivial.
Historian Douglas Brinkley, who edited the publication of the diaries, had to toss out chunks to boil the entries down to a 696-page memoir. But no one is shortchanged.
Reagan comes across as deeper, funnier, more religious and more humble than he seemed when he was striding across the world stage. He is true to his public persona -- foe of communism, tax increases, organized labor and, often, the news media.
The diaries are replete with his devotion to his wife, Nancy, and his despair at being lonely when she was not around.
On July 6, 1983, Reagan said: "Nancy's birthday! Life would be miserable if there wasn't a Nancy's birthday. What if she'd never been born? I don't want to think about it."
Also revealing were his tensions with his children -- Ronald Reagan Jr., who he said was anxious to shed his Secret Service protection, and Patti, who Reagan said had a "yo-yo relationship" with the family, whatever that means.
A former Hollywood star, he was an avid movie fan. He chafed at having to wear a bulletproof vest. And he resented as a "d..n gross violation of privacy" the fact that he had to make public every gift, even those from his personal friends.
There were many serious notes about the Middle East, often followed by a reference to watching a movie or "watching the 'Waltons on TV' and so to bed."
Here's how Reagan recalled his thoughts after he was shot in the lung by John Hinckley on March 30, 1981, outside the Washington Hilton Hotel as he walked toward his limousine. He was rushed to George Washington University Hospital and wrote:
"I was getting less and less air. I focused on that tiled ceiling and prayed. But I realized I couldn't ask for God's help while at the same time I felt hatred for the mixed up young man who had shot me. Isn't that the meaning of the lost sheep?"
Unlike President Richard M. Nixon, he did not have an "enemies list" of members of the press, but he was often outraged with the news media.
When Richard Allen, his first national security adviser, was accused of accepting gifts from the Japanese government, Reagan wrote, "The press has really been a lynch mob and I don't think they will stop which is why he can't be back in N.S.C. (National Security Council)."
In another entry, Reagan says: "Press Conference day. I think it was a good one but the 'pack' was blood thirsty."
"The press isn't after news. They want to trap you in a goof," he said at another point.
On June 7, 1981, he wrote: "Got word on Israeli bombing of Iraq nuclear reactor. I swear I believe Armageddon is near."
He recorded his observations about friend and foe.
On Oct. 13, 1981, Reagan said he met with "J.C." -- former President Jimmy Carter -- adding: "I expected the worst, but he was cordial, friendly and just exchanged views on the Middle East, etc."
Reagan had a friendly relationship with House Speaker Thomas "Tip" O'Neill, D-Mass., but that did not stop him from getting angry.
"Just saw a fund-raising letter signed by Tip O'Neill for Dem. Cong. Committee," he said. "It is the most vicious pack of lies I've ever seen. It's aimed at Sr. Citizens & has me out to destroy Medicare & Social Security. We can't let him get away with this."
As a reporter having covered him for eight years in the White House, I am sure the press could have done a better job if we had known the real Ronald Reagan.
(Helen Thomas can be reached at the e-mail address email@example.com).
“As a reporter having covered him for eight years in the White House, I am sure the press could have done a better job if we had known the real Ronald Reagan.”
Yea sure, Helen.
dont tease me helen you sexy wench!
Reagan was the LAST impressive Republican President. The others are something to be ashamed of for one reason or another ... Bush Sr. opening the door for abortion and this “big tent” crap. GWB ... immigration and destroying our country with ILLEGALS ... .
She secretly had a crush on RR!
LOL, Helen, Helen, Helen. You were too busy hating everything about Reagan, lying about him and trying to destroy him. You had no time to really get to know the real Ronald Reagan, and I doubt you really care. But nice work at trying to revise history by pretending you gave a damn.
I’m about 300 pages in and am enjoying the Diaries very much.
Helen neglects noting that RR was on the money with his comments about the press and anti-American actions by people such as Chris Dodd.
Honestly, I truly laughed out loud when I saw this one!
Oh, I dunno... "Up and down," maybe? What's not to understand? More evidence that the old witch is utterly clueless.
So another Lieberal has figured out the Ronald Reagan was a genius. Maybe in another 10 years, they will figure out he was also the best president produced in at least the last century.
Any praise she or any other Democrat media shill offers to Reagan now is intended solely as a criticism of Bush by comparison.
"All of us who covered the Reagan's agreed that President Reagan was personable and charming. But I'm not so certain he was nice. It's hard for me to think of anyone as nice when I hear him say The homeless are homeless because they want to be homeless.' To my mind, a President should care about all people, and he didn't, which is why I will always feel Reagan lacked soul."
When you look at Helen Thomas, just think “Mo Dowd in 30 years”
As Doris Day knew (and apparently Helen Thomas) - just coat that camera lens with gobs of vaseline and ANYONE can look good.
I got this book for father’s day from my kids. I haven’t had much time to get into it (only about half way through 1981), but so far it is a fantastic book and definately worth reading.
I think you nailed it.
Now that's a real knee slapper!
What didnt the press know? That RR hated communism? That he loved Nancy? That he was a tax cutter? That he was a man of God and for a strong national defense?
It was for these, and many more reasons, why they hated him so much.
There you go. Fixed.
Give her a break. The word “yo-yo” wasn’t well known until it’s entry into American-Filipino Dictionaries in the 1860’s, so Madam Thomas would never have heard the toy referred to as such. Maybe her children had a few “yo-yos”, but she probably played with them as “bangalores” or “quizzes”.
That’s “bandalore” not “bangalore” you idiot.
I don’t think it’ll take that long for MoDo.
I don’t think it worked in HT’s case...
I reading Reagan diaries
I read part when Ronnie miss Nancy he seem pouting ROFL
OMG are you telling me all these years Helen has secret crush on Ronnie
OH LORDY ROFL
Did you really need to post that picture?
You know you love it! :-)
Scum-sucking harridan. If you'd been better at your jobs, you would have known the real Ronald Reagan. FOAD, diseased hag.
So what do you day Helen, do you think Hilliary has an "enemies list?"
Emotionally cancerous skanks like Helen don't have "ups and downs." They only have "downs and downers."
Next time post the picture like Beelzebubba did, if you must!
She can't be that dim.
I actually had the opportunity to meet Helen Thomas. I don’t know too much about her political views, but on a personal level, she’s a very, very nice lady.
Very true. Still, this is the closest thing I’ve read to a good, factual column by Helen Thomas-— that is to say, not everything in it other than “Helen” and “Thomas” is an out and out falsehood.
That's a serious shock (to me), almost on the level of when Maureen Dowd inexplicably and uncharacteristically showed self-deprecating rather than nasty humor in relating teasing from her wise, solidly conservative Rush Limbaugh listening family in a column that was actually well written and fun to read.
Jimmah saved his worst for us.
Has Helen forgotten 'Patti'. . .her public maneuverings rising from her 'angst'. . .her 'tell all'? Or; does she think we have. . .
That said; Helen better be careful; being a Liberal means 'never having to say you are sorry'.
Sounds like she is getting close here.
I can only wish she would have played with a bangalore mine.
For those that don’t get the reference watch the D-Day landing in Saving Private Ryan.
One thing: He never did anything about the Marines lost in the Beirut barracks bombing. By his own words, it tends to have just drifted off his radar.
Your reading speed slows down greatly, when you're senile.
Omigod! This HAS to be the scariest thing since the green witch in “Over the Rainbow.”
Has the assertion of a number years back that she is an off spring of Mr. Ed, ever been disproved?
Hey Helen...you are the LAST person I would EVER take a recommendation from. I already know Ronald Reagan and who he was and what kind of man he was. Seems you are just finding out what a good man he was. So, I can think for myself and don’t need you to inform me of anything. Go back to the newsroom and ask some more silly/stupid questions.
8 years and they STILL didn’t know the man? Oh they are such good fodder for jokes aren’t they?
"As a reporter having covered him for eight years in the White House, I am sure the press could have done a better job if we had known the real Ronald Reagan."
Those two sentences are why Hell-un took the time to write. She is trying to excuse the hateful "reporting" of the press hounds (especially herself) by blaming Reagan for their refusing to know the real Ronald Reagan.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.