Exactly: I don’t see what (some) darwinists have against the teaching of empirical evidence against darwinism? Shouldn’t ALL the evidence be looked at, not just that (btw many of the early darwinist evidence has been debunked as hoaxes, and/or bad science) that uphold their worldview..?
If someone is honest they won’t take ANYONE’S word for it and will openly, but honestly explore empirical evidence for themselves, it seem so many don’t want to do this though (not just evolutionists, btw).
But all evidence should be looked at openly, not just that that favors “one side”.
(Censorship) is what happens most often!
If you can demonstrate that this "empirical evidence" exists anywhere but your bizarre imagination, please show us a sample.
Shouldnt ALL the evidence be looked at,
It is but, there's only so much time in a school day for science and that short time is best spent studying science not ignorantly debating every whako idea blurted out by pseudoscience charlatans and their deluded followers.