Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dismantling Campaign Finance Reform: Restoring Your Free Speech
Townhall.com ^ | June 26, 2007 | Sandy Froman

Posted on 06/26/2007 4:04:00 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 06/26/2007 4:04:01 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

John McCain, enemy of the State.


2 posted on 06/26/2007 4:05:46 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Satan is working both sides of the street in World Socialism and World Courts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

B-b-but, I thought John McCain was thought by many Republicans to be a fine Presidential candidate. Could there be other snakes in the grass, too?


3 posted on 06/26/2007 4:08:07 AM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (Now with an improved red neck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Justices Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg and Breyer vigorously dissented but a 4-vote energetic minority is still a minority.

Oh how liberals love free speech. Of course they only love free speech when it is about child pornography, Christian-bashing, or other repugnant things. A liberal can't honestly read the Constitution if their life depended on it.

4 posted on 06/26/2007 4:18:22 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The political class does not like the serfs criticizing THEM. They will again attempt to show their lessers THEIR place.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

5 posted on 06/26/2007 4:24:28 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Chief Justice Roberts, who is very careful to avoid issues not before the Court, clearly stated that he was not ruling on election ads because such ads were not at issue in this case.

A very important line to keep. To do otherwise is legislating and would be a much abused precedent for liberal courts.

6 posted on 06/26/2007 4:31:45 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

McCrazy’s assault on political speech ruled unconstitutional.

McCrazy’s amnesty for illegal aliens despised by 75% of Americans.

McCrazy for President!


7 posted on 06/26/2007 4:35:59 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: angkor

“McCrazy for President!”

Not for much longer!

LLS


8 posted on 06/26/2007 4:39:09 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

and they should be struck down....amazing that they were even passed...


9 posted on 06/26/2007 5:04:03 AM PDT by The Wizard (DemonRATS: enemies of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle

John McCain, enemy of liberty, friend of the statists!


10 posted on 06/26/2007 5:06:47 AM PDT by skepsel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
I hate being right all the time

When everyone was wetting their pants about how "conservative" that aleto and roberts were "going" to be, I said " we won't know until a few years of decisions come down"

Now, these two had a chance yesterday to get rid of what most here would agree is an unconstitutional restriction on free speech....but noooo......

In my view, another in a longggggg line of bush hopes frustrated by experience.

11 posted on 06/26/2007 5:07:05 AM PDT by cb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The Framers understood that the most important reason for free speech is to hold our government accountable by getting information out to the voters.

I've never bought this line. The reason that enumerating and protecting freedom of speech is important is not because elections/accountability is so important. It's because if anyone tries to take away our freedom it will be the government. It's no less important to use our freedom to discuss science, religion, the meaning of life, etc. Gubmint isn't the center of the Universe. Just a necessary evil that must be watched and kept in a cage.

12 posted on 06/26/2007 5:16:54 AM PDT by Huck (Soylent Green is People.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
They will again attempt to show their lessers THEIR place.

Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom, must, like men, undergo the fatigues of supporting it. - Thomas Paine

The essence of Government is power; and power, lodged as it must be in human hands, will ever be liable to abuse. - James Madison

A Republic, if you can keep it. - Benj. Franklin

13 posted on 06/26/2007 5:21:47 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cb
these two had a chance yesterday to get rid of what most here would agree is an unconstitutional restriction on free speech....but noooo......

I'm going to remain hopeful that they'll properly address the rest of it next year. There certainly will be planty of lawsuits beginning in January 2008.

Be patient.

14 posted on 06/26/2007 5:25:01 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
A liberal can't honestly read the Constitution if their life depended on it.

Yeah, it's really difficult to understand, isn't it. I ran the 1st Amendment through the MS Word readability check, and it's suitable for 9th graders.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

15 posted on 06/26/2007 6:08:32 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; Abram; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; amchugh; ...
Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
16 posted on 06/26/2007 6:24:45 AM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cb
They were deciding on only a narrow part of cfr. Roberts actually alluded to future subjects that will be litigated. They are CONSERVATIVE because they did NOT Legislate from the bench.

You need to understand how a Conservative Court functions. It is not a mirror image of a liberal court.

LLS

17 posted on 06/26/2007 6:32:45 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard
...amazing that they were even passed...

Even more amazing that our dim-witted president signed it.

GWB is an absolute failure, with the possible exception[s] of his SCOTUS nominations.

18 posted on 06/26/2007 6:35:20 AM PDT by Inquisitive1 (I know nothing except the fact of my ignorance - Socrates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
They are CONSERVATIVE because they did NOT Legislate from the bench.

Striking down unconstitutional laws is not legislating from the bench.

In any event, this has nothing to do with being CONSERVATIVE - Scalia is considered to be the most conservative member of the court and he legislates from the bench all the time. Time after time, Scalia, Rhenquist and even Thomas all ignored the clear meaning of the constitution in favor of "making the job of government workers easier".

The fact of the matter is that conservative justices have been shown to be just as likely to render their judgments based on their own world view just as much as liberal ones have.

The terms conservative and liberal are just vague labels and labels that have actually completely switched places over time. The term conservative now describes two distinct voting blocks - Christian socialists and "classic liberals" which believe in small government, property rights, civil liberties, free markets and constitutional limitations of government.

Unfortunately, Scalia, Thomas, Roberts and Alito fall into the category of christian socialists.

19 posted on 06/26/2007 7:06:47 AM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta
Man... you guys are a tough crowd! ;-)

I am afraid if Alito, Roberts, Thomas and Scalia are not to your liking, I think you might find your future SCOTUS wishes are beyond reality.

LLS

20 posted on 06/26/2007 8:50:22 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson