Skip to comments.
Should Conservatives Look at Thompson’s Record or His Rhetoric?
Townhall ^
| 06/28/2007
| Janice Shaw Crouse
Posted on 06/28/2007 11:46:13 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
His problems will likely stem from interviews in the early 90s when he said that he opposed criminalizing abortion and opposed a constitutional amendment protecting the sanctity of life. Further, at that time he told reporters that while he was pro-life, he didnt support the prohibition of early term abortions.Ahhh, here we go again!
To: Responsibility2nd
Record. Rhetoric counts for nada.
2
posted on
06/28/2007 11:48:05 AM PDT
by
P-40
(Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
To: Responsibility2nd
problems will likely stem from interviews in the early 90s when he said that he opposed criminalizing abortion and opposed a constitutional amendment protecting the sanctity of life. Further, at that time he told reporters that while he was pro-life, he didnt support the prohibition of early term abortions. Isn't this similar to Miers who had been pro-choice years ago but had changed her stance in the interim?
3
posted on
06/28/2007 11:48:49 AM PDT
by
what's up
To: jellybean
4
posted on
06/28/2007 11:49:00 AM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(Global Warming is Leftist Theology - Why is it Being Taught in School?)
To: Responsibility2nd
I guess they are not satisfied with FDT. You would think the prospect of President Hildabeast would be a motivating enough factor.
5
posted on
06/28/2007 11:49:14 AM PDT
by
Perdogg
(congratulations - you have just won an ipod nano)
To: Responsibility2nd
6
posted on
06/28/2007 11:50:24 AM PDT
by
Libertina
(Mexicao has shoreline, natural resources, climate -all it needs for a prosperous country. NO AMNESTY)
To: Responsibility2nd
Rhetoric doesn’t change laws; votes do.
7
posted on
06/28/2007 11:50:28 AM PDT
by
jdm
To: P-40
He was elected twice in Tennessee. He is not pro-abortion.
Next.
8
posted on
06/28/2007 11:51:11 AM PDT
by
Patrick1
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: Responsibility2nd
The media just don’t get it. It is like two men running from the bear. Fred doesn’t have to be the perfect conservative. He just has to be the best conservative who is running and who can win. So far, in my opinion, he fills that bill. There is no other Republican who could win the nomination who has stronger conservative credentials.
To: Responsibility2nd
Actually, this is a pretty fair article. And I think Fred supporter have no problem with his record being scrutinized. There will be things people disagree with, but overall Fred is very solid.
11
posted on
06/28/2007 11:53:29 AM PDT
by
The Blitherer
(What would a Free Man do?)
To: Responsibility2nd
Ahhh, here we go again!Yep.
As far as I'm concerned Fred's the man to take this one. Is he perfect? Of course not. But look at the DANG CHOICES.
Perfectionists will once again be unsatisfied with any Republican candidate, and hammer hard any one suggested. Up until now, they had a point (with Rudy McRomney). But now is the time to focus on the best shot we have, and indeed, hardly a comprimise that would require much nose holding.
So, until I see something drastic (and not what I've seen in this piece, which is just regurgitated anti-Thomoson bilge), I'm going with him and HOPING he WILL run.
The perfectionists can have their Ron Paul, et al. Once again, their vote won't matter anyway.
To: P-40; Responsibility2nd
Should Conservatives Look at Thompsons Record or His Rhetoric? His current rhetoric matches his record. It's largely his earlier rhetoric that is getting spun.
13
posted on
06/28/2007 11:53:54 AM PDT
by
IMRight
To: Responsibility2nd
The twisting continues.. you would think at least ONE reporter would due diligence and see if they are continuing to spout false or misleading information.
14
posted on
06/28/2007 11:53:56 AM PDT
by
mnehring
(Virtus Junxit Mors Non Separabit)
To: P-40
Record-
Voted YES on maintaining ban on Military Base Abortions. (Jun 2000)
Voted YES on banning partial birth abortions. (Oct 1999)
Voted YES on banning human cloning. (Feb 1998)
15
posted on
06/28/2007 11:55:01 AM PDT
by
mnehring
(Virtus Junxit Mors Non Separabit)
To: Responsibility2nd
‘His problems will likely stem from interviews in the early 90s when he said that he opposed criminalizing abortion and opposed a constitutional amendment protecting the sanctity of life. Further, at that time he told reporters that while he was pro-life, he didnt support the prohibition of early term abortions. ‘
It won’t have any real effect politically in the 2008 race. Those that would like a Democrat in the Whitehouse hope that will be the case, but its wishful thinking.
16
posted on
06/28/2007 11:55:34 AM PDT
by
Badeye
("In 2 weeks, I join the list of UNEMPLOYED". ...Goldi-Lox (karma comes around))
To: Truth is a Weapon
i agree 100%, that is it in a nutshell. there is no need to quibble over half the stupid crap that is raised about him, because short of someone as electable and as conservative as he is entering the race, i will be voting for him.
17
posted on
06/28/2007 11:56:07 AM PDT
by
xsmommy
To: Responsibility2nd
Fred's major accomplishment when in Congress was helping with McCain-Feingold.
I'm not saying I wouldn't vote for him. It's way too early for me to tell.
But that's not such a great thing to have accomplished IMO.
To: Patrick1
Post #15 tells a different story.
19
posted on
06/28/2007 11:57:54 AM PDT
by
P-40
(Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
To: The Blitherer
Actually, this is a pretty fair articleI'm glad you think so. I respect Janice Shaw Crouse but I was wondering if she was swallowing the MSM kool-aid regarding Fred.
20
posted on
06/28/2007 11:58:32 AM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(Global Warming is Leftist Theology - Why is it Being Taught in School?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson