Posted on 07/01/2007 10:09:35 AM PDT by Kitten Festival
Energy Policy: MoveOn.org targets Michigan Democrat John Dingell for his reluctance to increase fuel economy standards. Maybe he knows higher standards won't promote energy independence or save the earth.
Rep. Dingell, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, has been protective of the auto industry and skeptical over the effectiveness of higher corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards in fighting global warming.
He has resisted fighting climate change on the backs of a beleaguered U.S. auto industry, at least as long as countries like China and India are allowed to build cars and roads without any environmental restrictions. If there's to be job-killing pain, he wants everyone to share it.
(Excerpt) Read more at ibdeditorials.com ...
CAFE standards prompt the auto industry to do just enough mileage adjustments to get by. I’d rather see the auto industry notice that high quality, high mileage cars sell well here because gas is expensive. Seems like the foreign car makers understand that concept pretty well.
bookmark
CAFE equals ‘Blood for Oil’. Over 3000 people DIE every year due to riding in small cars forced by CAFE. Higher standards will cause even more deaths.
My old Geo Storm got 33mpg driving around Wash DC in urban traffic using pure gasoline. After 15% ethanol was introduced, my mpg dropped to 29 for the same daily comute to work.
Democrapt genius: mandate ethanol which causes cars to get less mileage and raise the CAFE requiements for cars to get better mileage. screwing the public twice.
Then again, at least some of your money stayed in the U.S. after it was spent.
Ethanol may go down as one of the largest folly issues of this decade. The BTU content is less than gasoline, so all mileage will suffer accordingly. When we use it in auto racing, we normally do so in a supercharged/turbocharged environment for the most part because you are required to push so much fuel volume though the engine - in drag racing, it is about TWICE the amount gasoline would require. However, racing likes it because it does not easily detonate under compression or heat loads; for the rest of us, figure you will lose about 10% efficiency/economy for every 10% you put through your tank, as you need that much more FUEL to operate in the same horsepower environment. None of these idiots in Congress seem to understand that the mileage numbers they want to require of us, the US citizen, are already skewed by this. Of course, this doesn't matter to them; we pay for their travel and expenses....
Thanks for the post. I agree that ethnol isn’t the answer. Maybe we should power cars with the bovine farts that are increasing global warming.
whoops!
MoveOn.org targets Dingell
planetgore.nationalreview.com | June 28, 2007 | Henry Payne
Posted on 06/28/2007 1:55:55 PM EDT by neverdem
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1857779/posts
Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.