Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gpapa

Why in the world would a Republican want to run as the “anti-bush”? That is a defeatist attitude if I have ever seen one. Bush has made some mistakes, I grant, but we have all the anti-Bush candidates we need running now: Hillary, Obama, Paul, etc., and they are all losers.

Whoever gets the nomination at the Republican convention will need the support of the President to win. That won’t be enough by itself to elect the next Republican President, but without it the Democrats will win.


3 posted on 07/03/2007 5:13:31 AM PDT by HoustonTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: HoustonTech
Whoever gets the nomination at the Republican convention will need the support of the President to win.

I doubt it. Whoever wins the nomination probably won't want the president anywhere near them.

9 posted on 07/03/2007 5:28:27 AM PDT by Huck (Soylent Green is People.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: HoustonTech

bump


12 posted on 07/03/2007 5:40:00 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: HoustonTech
Why in the world would a Republican want to run as the “anti-bush”? That is a defeatist attitude if I have ever seen one. Bush has made some mistakes, I grant, but we have all the anti-Bush candidates we need running now: Hillary, Obama, Paul, etc., and they are all losers.

It has more to do with swing voters. You may be in Bush's ideal demographic, but there are definitely people out there who won't respond to the same appeals and qualities that they identify with the current President.

I guess Bartlett's mistake is in thinking that you can produce a candidate in accordance with a recipe. Republicans weren't looking for another Eisenhower in 1980. They chose Reagan on his own merits.

Older voters may see Fred and think Reagan, but a lot of younger voters will see him and think Bush, for better or for worse. Maybe he has to find his "inner Fred" and hope the rest of us will respond, and not try to copy someone else.

Whoever gets the nomination at the Republican convention will need the support of the President to win. That won’t be enough by itself to elect the next Republican President, but without it the Democrats will win.

Well, if Bush is going to be "that way" and try to boss the party around, maybe people are right to be fed up with him. I'd hope he'd have the graciousness to support the party's nominee wholeheartedly, and not make it about himself.

37 posted on 07/03/2007 10:53:25 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: HoustonTech
Why in the world would a Republican want to run as the “anti-bush”?

You mean who would want to run as sovereign representative of the people rather than a globalist? Sovereignty is what the people want, not open borders globalist looting of the American economy and the sell out of our domestic infrastructure to foreign governments.
45 posted on 07/05/2007 7:12:18 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer (I'm a billionaire! Thanks WTO and the "free trade" system!--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: HoustonTech

Because Bush is no Conservative, that’s why.

The Republicans continue to “NOT get it”. He’s done far more than make mistakes. People can forgive mistakes. Sheer determined arrogance against the very people who put him in office is quite another matter.

The Republicans can and will put a conservative up for the presidency, or the Republicans will be defeated in 2008

Liberal Democrats and Liberal Republicans are still Liberal.

The party be damned.


47 posted on 07/05/2007 7:20:43 PM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (Famously frisky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson