Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Caesar Soze

But he wasn’t comparing Darwin’s house to historical landmarks, he was comparing it to religious shrines.


43 posted on 07/06/2007 12:19:23 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: GodGunsGuts
But he wasn’t comparing Darwin’s house to historical landmarks, he was comparing it to religious shrines.

Hardly an original comparison; such comparisons are made every day about the places I mentioned. Not only are such comparisons made, they are afar more apt. Washington is full of Grecian temples housing statues of culture heroes. A US President declared Gettysburg to be consecrated and hallowed ground. Traditional cult activity takes place at Graceland -- processions, offerings made to the dead, the sale of mementos, etc.

Why, then, is Darwin's house alone among these examples a literal religious shrine?

(Aside: I'm glad you noticed he was only comparing it to religious shrines. Think back to middle school English: What do you call a comparison of two unlike things?)

58 posted on 07/06/2007 12:49:24 PM PDT by Caesar Soze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson