More women feeling skeptical about Clinton's authenticity - though they wish they weren't

The Dallas Morning News ^ | July 8, 2007 | Melinda Henneberger

[Eric Blair 2084]

Rush did a segment on this article today. I don't know if he saw it here or more likely the same place I did, on realclearpolitics.com.

He referenced the obvious comparisons between the Hildebeast and French Socialist candidate Royal (the only similarities that I see are that they are both Socialists and they both have breasts).

Comparison To Clinton Is Dismissed French Counterpart Lacked Substance, Senator Clinton's Camp Says

Unlike Royal, who emphasized her charm and femininity rather than her strength on foreign policy, Clinton has proven her national security bona fides, her advisers said. They argued that unlike Royal, Clinton does best among her own gender. An Ipsos exit poll on Sunday found that Royal lost the women's vote by 4 percentage points, while 2008 polling in the United States has shown a gender gap in which Clinton performs stronger among women, particularly those younger than 60.

[murron]

“Unlike Royal, who emphasized her charm and femininity rather than her strength on foreign policy, Clinton has proven her national security bona fides, her advisers said.”

There’s no way that Hillary could emphasize her charm and femininity, since she has none.