Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FR EXCLUSIVE: Spiderman Stan Lee and POW! Entertainment Sued in Fed Court re Bankruptcy Illegalities
stanleemedia.net and other sources ^ | 7-9-07 | DFU

Posted on 07/09/2007 6:12:39 PM PDT by doug from upland

NOTE: this is an incredible story. Shining the light on this bankruptcy case will shine more light on the Clintons. The case was filed today at 5pm in Federal District Court in Los Angeles.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Spider Man Creator Stan Lee and POW! Entertainment (POWN) Sued by Stan Lee Media for Illegalities In Bankruptcy Transfers

Federal Lawsuit filed Monday by Stan Lee Media in Los Angeles Details Frauds by SpiderMan Creator Lee in Taking Assets from Bankruptcy Estate to Launch New Public Company Owned and Operated by Lee and SLM Insiders

LOS ANGELES July 9, 2007 -- The company that was founded by Spider Man creator Stan Lee in 1999 and saved from attempted legal annihilation by Lee in November 2006 by Wall Street whistleblower James Nesfield has today filed suit against Lee and his new public company POW Entertainment for illegal transfers of assets from the Estate in Bankruptcy along with other allegations of serious wrongdoing.

The following are pertinent quotes from the Complaint:

8.defendants have conspired to commit and have otherwise engaged in acts of fraud upon plaintiff, plaintiff’s shareholders, plaintiff’s creditors and the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California.

9.defendant Stan Lee with the help of other insiders (Gil Champion and Arthur Lieberman)founded two new companies named POW! And QED in or about November 2001. Thereafter, Stan Lee proceeded illegally to transfer substantial assets of plaintiff into QED and POW!, all while plaintiff was in bankruptcy and while Stan Lee should have been protecting plaintiff’s assets from misappropriation. The acts of Stan Lee and his newly formed companies were perpetrated with the specific intent to (a) mislead the Bankruptcy Court, (B) violate express orders of the Bankruptcy court, and (c) loot and defraud plaintiff and plaintiff’s shareholders and creditors for defendants’ personal financial gain.

18. The October 151998 Employment/Rights Agreement from Stan Lee included an assignment in favor of Stan Lee Entertainment Inc., which stated in pertinent part: “I [Stan Lee] assign, convey and grant to [Stan Lee Entertainment Inc.] forever all right, title and interest I may have or control now or in the future in the following: Any and all ideas, names, titles, characters, symbols, logos, designs, likenesses, visual representations, artwork, stories, plots, scripts, episodes, literary property and the conceptual universe related thereto, including my name and likeness (the ‘Property’) which will or have been in whole or part disclosed in writing to.published merchandised, advertised and/or licensed by [Stan Lee Entertainment Inc.]its affiliates and successors in interest and licensees (which by agreement inures to [Stan Lee Entertainment Inc.’s] benefit) or any of them and any copyrights, trademarks, statutory rights, common law, goodwill, moral rights and any other rights whatsoever in the Property in any and all media and/or fields, including all rights to renewal or extensions of copyright and make applications or institute suits therefore (the ‘Rights’). ” Plaintiff is currently the rightful owner and holder of all rights and assets set forth in the October 15, 1998 Agreement as plaintiff is the ultimate successor in interest to Stan Lee Entertainment Inc.a Delaware corporation.

25.Since October 15, 1998, the October 15, 1998 Agreement has never been terminated and remains in full force and effect.

26. The October 15, 1998 Agreement was recorded by plaintiff on or about November 28, 2006 with the United States Copyright Office. (and has not been challenged)

The claim includes rights to ownership of all creations of Stan Lee since he left SLM: K) including but not limited to everything he has worked on while affiliated with defendants POW! And QED.

76. Contrary to plaintiff’s ownership rights to same the defendants have used, marketed, licensed, merchandised, promoted, advertised and otherwise exploited the Assets for their own financial benefit and without the participation, authority and consent of plaintiff. Defendants have used or licensed Stan Lee’s name and/or likeness in conjunction with their efforts.

Allegations of SEC Fraud in Public Statements and Actions by POW

82. On or about December 13, 2005, the defendant POW! issued a press release containing false and misleading factual information which clearly demonstrates its intent as well as the intent of the other defendants to assert control and ownership over the Assets and Properties as well as the name and likeness of Stan Lee to the exclusion of the plaintiff: “Los Angeles, CA , December 13, 2005- POW! Entertainment (PK: POWN)has announced that POW! Entertainment acquired the exclusive rights and ownership in perpetuity to the name “Stan Lee” ...

This lawsuit is being filed by famed Los Angeles litigator Pierce O'Donnell and managed by Sean Sheppard of the Andersen Firm in Florida.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

About Stan Lee Media: Stan Lee Media can be found on the World Wide Web at http://WWW.stanleemedia.net

Stan Lee Media, founded by Stan Lee in October 1998 to build an Internet based Super Hero creation and production studio in Hollywood, emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on December 6, 2006 under the control of Wall Street whistleblower James Nesfield. The law suit, filed against Marvel on March 15, 2007 and now against Stan Lee et al, resulted from a rigorous legal review and forensic analysis of all rights, assets and claims that survived Stan Lee Media's six year bankruptcy proceedings as remaining assets of the company.

Mr. Nesfield became identified on 60 Minutes and in his testimony before the U.S. Senate as the whistle blower who exposed the biggest Wall Street fraud in history, the trillion dollar Mutual Fund Market Timing Scandal. Mr. Nesfield followed Stan Lee Media since its inception as a high flying NASDQ dot Com company during its publicized run up to a $350 million market cap in February 2000 and its flame out in December 2000, when its third death spiral convertible financing was announced on November 30, 2000.

After Stan Lee Media filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy protection in Los Angeles in February 2001, Mr. Nesfield followed the actions by the Debtor in Possession management directed by Stan Lee, noting that the bulk of the company's assets were hidden and/or transferred indirectly to a new public company, POW Entertainment, created by Stan Lee and other Stan Lee Media insiders Gil Champion and Arthur Lieberman.

Mr. Nesfiled determined that the Primary Asset of the company, all of Stan Lee's Intellectual Property rights, had remained with the company when it was dismissed for cause as warranted by the US Trustee Jennifer Braun. When the company reverted to the control of shareholders, Nesfield became President and Chairman of the revived company.

After rigorous legal review of all the actions taken by or on behalf of the company since its inception, Mr. Nesfield confirmed that, among the Intellectual Property rights that Stan Lee assigned to capitalize his new company in October 1998, were all of his co-creator's rights to his Marvel creations. After Stan Lee's lifetime exclusive employment contract with Marvel was voided during Marvel's Chapter 11 Bankruptcy proceedings in 1998, all of Stan Lee's rights reverted back to him. When Lee gave everything he owned in the "creative universe" as of October 15, 1998 to his new company it included Lee's 50% ownership interest in the largest entertainment franchises in the industry.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: spiderman; stanlee
For those who haven't followed the story, the Clintons had a major role in the collapse of Stan Lee Media. This case is the one that will have the Clintons and a plethora of their pals under oath --- Paul v Clinton. Details and loads of documents are at HILLCAP.ORG
1 posted on 07/09/2007 6:12:46 PM PDT by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Stan Lee Media is involved in two separate law suits- the first is to assert its rights to 50% of all of Stan Lee's superhero creations for Marvel and the second is the claims against Stan Lee and his partner-lawyer Srthur Lieberman for misconduct in administering the Chapter 11 proceedings of the Estate of Stan Lee Media from Feb 2001- Nov 2006.

While the cases are unrelated, they are based on the same Rights Transfer agreement that Stan Lee made with Stan Lee Entertainment in October, 1998. Under that Agreement (prior in time by 30 days to a similar Agreement Stan signed with Marvel which was also fraudulent on its face because it warranted that the October Agreement was never made) Stan Lee Media became the owner of ALL of Stan Lee's intellectual property rights for what he owned in October, 1998 and what he would create in the future. Because Marvel vioded Stan's original lifetime exclusive contract with Marvel in August 1998, all rights Stan ever owned reverted to him as of September, 1998 and were owned by him in October when he made the assignment to SLM. SLM continues to own those rights which lee hid in his administration of the Bankruptcy.

2 posted on 07/09/2007 6:16:31 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Federal civil suit, not a criminal one, right?

If not criminal now, what comes about under oath will contribute to a criminal prosecution down the line.

Nice post as usual Doug.

It’s clobberin’ time!

3 posted on 07/09/2007 6:17:31 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Link here your youtube video of Stan Lee with Hillary yucking up the planning of that event Doug. Might as well offer the whole enchilada here for FR consumption my friend.
4 posted on 07/09/2007 6:20:05 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

I cannot say that it has happened or will happen, but if the Trustee suspects wrongdoing by a debtor in possession, it is the job of the Trustee to make a criminal referral.

In the bankruptcy, the court approved an agreement that would allow Lee to pull out certain properties from the BK free and clear of creditors and put them into a company called SLC LLC. The purpose was to develop the characters for the benefit of the shareholders and to pay off debts. I have seen the exhibits. That company was never formed by Lee.

Instead, a few months prior to the dismissal of the bankruptcy, there are recorded documents showing a transfer of certain characters and properties to QED, a subsidiary of POW! Entertainment. There is no evidence anywhere to show that the court, the creditors, or the Trustee were aware of that transfer.


5 posted on 07/09/2007 6:25:10 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Does this mean that the trademarks, characters, and licensing were shifted away from Marvel when Ron Pearlman almost sent the company (and the whole industry) belly up in the 1990s?

What of Jack Kirby, Steve Ditko, and other CO-creators at Marvel? Did they ever get to establish partial ownership? Or did they settle for a lump sum payment?


6 posted on 07/09/2007 6:27:36 PM PDT by weegee (If the Fairness Doctrine is imposed on USA who will CNN news get to read the conservative rebuttal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
THIS IS A SMOKING GUN VIDEO to show Hillary's involvement and solicitation in an illegal in-kind, hard money contribution in excess of $1.6 million.
7 posted on 07/09/2007 6:27:41 PM PDT by doug from upland ((Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: weegee

The position of the newly reformed Stan Lee Media, under the direction of Nesfield, is that SLM owns 1/2 of the rights that are claimed by Marvel. SLM filed a $5 billion lawsuit a few months ago against Marvel. You can see the links previously provided, the two contracts made by Lee.

There are some very, very powerful attorneys representing Stan Lee Media in both cases.


8 posted on 07/09/2007 6:30:08 PM PDT by doug from upland ((Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
He’ll lose his shirt in court and if it doesn’t fully settle out of court he will get the criminal referrals.

I know of a similar case a friend of mine had that mirrored what you are talking about and the people they sued avoided the criminal stuff by out of court settlements for lots of money with privacy made as part of the settlement.

The stock holders want money more than Lee in jail, and now based on evidence, they will be able to force Lee to pay far more to them than they would have originally paid themselves in the investment.

Lee has totally screwed himself and could lose 85% of so of what he tried to take.

Here is a bit of a link where Lee is connected from the past for you as well.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1008003/posts

9 posted on 07/09/2007 6:31:26 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Stan Lee was dumped by Marvel. Peter Paul was instrumental in setting him free so he could genuinely profit from his creations. At Marvel, he was only an employee. Lee later sued Marvel and got a settlement that was probably in excess of $15 million. Because of the contract signed with SLM that was never disavowed, the position of SLM is that the benefits accrue for SLM and the stockholders.


10 posted on 07/09/2007 6:32:43 PM PDT by doug from upland ((Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
If Lee had earned 5 billion, he could expect to go before a retired judge with this two years from now, to have to settle out of court for 4 billion or to lose 4 billion anyway and get criminal referrals.

Depends on if the Judge is related to a friend of someone. Unless Lee gets that kind of break, he’s screwed... as he should be.

11 posted on 07/09/2007 6:33:33 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: weegee

I don’t know anything about a resolution with Kirby and Ditko.


12 posted on 07/09/2007 6:33:59 PM PDT by doug from upland ((Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Yep, I’ve heard of that exact situation before, and unless the judge is crooked, Lee can’t use the excuse of not liking contracts he signed to get out of them.
13 posted on 07/09/2007 6:35:05 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

Yes, Lee has screwed himself. How would you like to own stock in POW! Entertainment? How would you like to be someone from Disney who recently negotiated a deal with Lee?

The complaint and exhibits are lengthy. I think they may be about 100 pages. When I have some time, I may pull a few of the exhibits for your enjoyment. The recorded documents really tell a story.


14 posted on 07/09/2007 6:36:40 PM PDT by doug from upland ((Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

I have read some of the BK file, which took many, many hours. It only scratched the surface. Because of the contract Lee had with SLM, one would think that such contract and the rights therefrom would have been an enormous asset to be listed in the BK. Why was it not listed as an asset? It was the most valuable asset. Shareholders settled for pennies on the dollar. And now, by some superhero magic, characters and assets are part of the new POW! Entertainment. That is a big, big problem.


15 posted on 07/09/2007 6:41:09 PM PDT by doug from upland ((Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
100 pages would not be lengthy, it is a slow start.

In the one similar case I remember, my friend went after the other folks and in discovery they threw back some 40 thousand pages of documents.
The technique was an attempt to comply with the court, but to make finding evidence against them very tough to do.

Well as I told you before once, they got a fast scanner and paper-port. Scanned all the documents in 4 days and then used the data base feature in paper-port to search for evidence of what they needed. They could bring up evidence in seconds that on other cases they would never find.

Anyway, look for a paper dump in the tens of thousands, it is what lawyers do in multimillion dollar cases.

16 posted on 07/09/2007 6:46:55 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Post what ever you wish here with the exhibits and documents please. If it is public knowledge in public records, then all Stan Lee can do is cry himself a river.

The side benefit would be that you might find you are getting this a lot more in the public’s attention.

Think about linking your video in this thread please with Stan Lee all full of himself in that other possible piece of criminality.

17 posted on 07/09/2007 6:51:07 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

There was a crooked man, and he went a crooked mile,
He found a crooked sixpence beside a crooked stile;
He bought a crooked cat, which caught a crooked mouse,
And they all lived together in a little crooked house

18 posted on 07/09/2007 6:54:34 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY ((((Truth shall set you free))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

Claim Against Marvel Alleges Co-Ownership of Superheroes
March 19, 2007

By Eriq Gardner

NEW YORK — The battle for control of superhero characters created by Stan
Lee is heating up, with the company formerly run by the comic book legend
suing Marvel Entertainment for billions of dollars, claiming co-ownership of
characters such as Spider-Man, the Incredible Hulk and X-Men.

The suit, filed last week in New York District Court on behalf of Stan Lee
Media Inc., claims that Lee, who was terminated in 1998 by Marvel, set up a
company and signed an “Employment Agreement/Rights Assignment” contract that
gave the co-creative interests in his characters to his new company.

According to the complaint, filed by Goodwin Proctor partner Ethan Horwitz,
the “assignment has never been terminated and continues to be in full force
and effect.”

Lee is no longer in control of SLMI, and the new suit against Marvel is the
latest development in the acrimonious relationship between Lee and the
company that bears his name.

After Lee formed SLMI in 1998 with the stated purpose of bringing his
superheroes to the digital age, the company suffered a dot-com meltdown. In
2001, it filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, and during bankruptcy proceedings,
shareholders installed new executives, including James Nesfield as its new
chairman and president.

Earlier this year, Lee sued SLMI’s new executives, accusing them of having
conspired to fraudulently gain control of the company and having
“misappropriated, infringed and interfered with copyrights, trademarks,
publicity rights and contract rights owned exclusively by Stan Lee and his
companies.”

The suit filed last week appears to be the company’s counterattack against
Lee. In recent years, Lee and Marvel have made amends, with Lee now serving
as president emeritus of Marvel Comics. Marvel maintains that it has full
ownership over the characters at issue and has issued a statement by Lee
that reads, “I do not support this action and believe the suit to be
baseless.”

The plaintiffs allege causes of action for accounting, declaratory relief,
constructive trust and two counts of interference with the right of
publicity. They are demanding 50% of all income, proceeds and profits
derived from Marvel’s use, marketing, licensing, merchandising, promotion,
advertising and exploitation of the Lee characters, which have been the
basis for films that have grossed billions in total boxoffice.

Nesfield said SLMI might force Lee to testify in court.

“Stan Lee is no longer with the company,” Nesfield said. “But the contract
remains intact. He has signed it, and the contract is still in force.”

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

As a caveat and for the record, because I was in California, Jim Nesfield asked me to be the VP of the newly reformed SLM Inc. They needed someone to physically go to the storage unit and collect all of the books, records, and any remaining property. He gave me a resolution to give me that authority, and I agreed to do so. The Debtor in Possession would not allow me to take possession of the books and records. I officially resigned as VP, when that purpose could not be accomplished, and such resignation was approved. Nevertheless, the attorney for Lee named me on the lawsuit they had earlier filed.

You will find this interesting. In one of the last motions made in court, the attorney for the debtor in possession made a motion TO DESTROY CORPORATE RECORDS because they claimed they could not afford to store them. We discovered that many months earlier they paid off a large storage bill and took possession of those books and records.

Lee’s counsel has claimed that the newly reformed SLM was formed illegally. Well, there was a public notice for shareholders to come to a meeting. Lee himself was given notice of the meeting sent to his home. He, did not go to the meeting. Nesfield had the shareholders necessary and the proxies necessary to conduct business. His purpose was to save the company.


19 posted on 07/09/2007 6:57:43 PM PDT by doug from upland ((Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Stan has done great things in his life with the creation of superheroes who taught good messages to kids. We are going to find out what happened.


20 posted on 07/09/2007 7:01:37 PM PDT by doug from upland ((Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: All

Some reporters have been alerted about the filing. Let’s see how many others will come here to get their breaking news. Hey, Drudge, are you listening?


21 posted on 07/09/2007 7:03:05 PM PDT by doug from upland ((Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

22 posted on 07/09/2007 7:04:40 PM PDT by bannie (The Good Guys cannot win when they're the only ones to play by the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Yep, this sounds just like my friends deal except it was over a different type of product.

They need to get a judge to stop all destruction of records, emails and so forth. You also want to go collect all prior company computers with warrants and to read everything there, including deleted files.

Also, EMAILS is a big deal, you have cause to go get everyones Emails and to observe communications in writing between themselves over what was conspired between them.

Most people don’t realize Email is forever and that servers probably still have them all.

They are not only due the 50% from the deal, but are due punitive damages probably worth another 30+%. If Lee doesn't settle out of court, then a criminal referral will be made as you said.

Fun stuff. :-)

23 posted on 07/09/2007 7:08:32 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Wonder how his new character “SUPER SNEAKY” will do.


24 posted on 07/09/2007 7:10:10 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

Lee should have settled. I guess we are going to see if he got bad advice.


25 posted on 07/09/2007 7:11:42 PM PDT by doug from upland ((Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
:(

After watching the Who Wants to be a Superhero? reality show last season, I thought Stan Lee was a decent guy until I saw the illegal campaign video with him in it. He had his head so far up Hitlery's @ss it almost made me throw up. Then this. What a loser.

26 posted on 07/09/2007 7:12:27 PM PDT by MCH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Bill Clinton:
"Your Honor, we had a gentleman's agreement. I decided not to honor that agreement, when news came out that Peter Paul had been involved in a swindle. I no longer wanted to be involved in private business with somebody like that"

Judge: "Sounds good to me...you may step down Mr. President."
27 posted on 07/09/2007 7:14:31 PM PDT by stylin19a (Since bad golf shots come in groups of 3, a 4th bad shot is the start of the next group of 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Lee doesn’t have to settle yet.

This won’t see a court for 2-7 years.

My friend had to live with his ca ca for almost 10 years I think.

By that time, Stan Lee could be dead.

Anyway, he can offer to make the whole thing go away 7 years from now and still avoid criminal referral if it goes like my friends stuff went.

I’m going on the past and the state of California, I have no clue if laws changes and other differences here though.

28 posted on 07/09/2007 7:14:47 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Watch out for Bomb Threats.


29 posted on 07/09/2007 7:15:32 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy (Hillary in '08.....Her PHONINESS is GENUINE !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MCH

I don’t fault Stan for kissing up to Hillary. He wanted to build the public company. That is business. When I first met Peter Paul in North Carolina over two years ago, I told him what I thought of him for funding Hillary. He agreed that it was the biggest mistake of his life. Unfortunately, he was wrapped up in business over 18 hours a day for quite some time. He had quit paying attention to politics and had no idea how bad Bill and Hillary really were. Scoff if you want, but that is how it was. He had tunnel vision trying to build a business. No matter who was the president, a former president can raise huge sums of money very quickly. He made the deal to fund Hillary so that Bill would raise money for the company for one year.


30 posted on 07/09/2007 7:19:09 PM PDT by doug from upland ((Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

As I said earlier, I don’t know if a criminal referral has been made. I can say that it would not surprise me.


31 posted on 07/09/2007 7:20:47 PM PDT by doug from upland ((Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

I can assure you no criminal referrals have been made yet.
The possible referrals would be a chip to bargain with in what will be the out of court settlement.

Unless there is a crooked Judge favoring Lee, I can not see him getting away without having to settle out of court, which would have them all paying the 50% due plus fairly massive damages.


32 posted on 07/09/2007 7:23:39 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

I don’t think you can assure me that no criminal referrals have been made. Keep in mind also a potential problem with the SEC. POW! Entertainment is a public company with stockholders. What did they tell their stockholders in their offerings? What was told to Disney or to anyone else who has made agreements with POW!?

From the company profile, do you think there might be a problem:

POW! Entertainment has the exclusive rights and ownership in perpetuity to the name “Stan Lee,” his likeness, brand and signature slogans “Stan Lee Presents,” “Excelsior” and “Stan’s Soap Box.” POW! also acquired most of the intellectual properties created by Stan Lee during the period beginning after his tenure as Marvel’s chief creative officer, editor in chief, and publisher and predate POW! Entertainment. The rights are in addition to new properties that are currently being developed by Stan Lee for other major entertainment conglomerates on behalf of POW! Entertainment.


33 posted on 07/09/2007 7:38:55 PM PDT by doug from upland ((Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

34 posted on 07/09/2007 7:49:41 PM PDT by doug from upland ((Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy

From Hillary or POW?


35 posted on 07/09/2007 7:50:17 PM PDT by doug from upland ((Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Yep, that should generate 100 thousand documents of discovery at least. :-)


36 posted on 07/09/2007 7:59:33 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
You might like this. Stan signed this agreement with the court for SLC LLC, a company that did not exist. Go figure that out.


37 posted on 07/09/2007 8:00:12 PM PDT by doug from upland ((Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Kirhy is dead, I think.


38 posted on 07/09/2007 8:19:13 PM PDT by steve8714 ("A man needs a maid", my ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Great post Doug. I always knew Stan lee was an unabashed Leftie but after viewing the video linked in reply #7...I will be bringing out ALL of my X-Men comics and burning them tomorrow.

This will be painful as I have a collection of hundreds of issues dating from the early 70's....but Stan Lee is a POS and I cannot in good conscience keep them in my possesion or allow them to exist any longer.

I'm a DC man from now on.

39 posted on 07/09/2007 8:21:50 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Don't question faith. Don't answer lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

Well, that’s a nice fantasy scenario for Bill. But it won’t fly.

Three days after the Gala of Aug. 12, 2000, Peter’s role in the $8.7 mil sting on Fidel Castro was revealed. The Clintons, through the lying weasel Howard Wolfson, disavowed Peter. If you were Bill Clinton, how would you explain meeting Peter as you stepped off Air Force One in Los Angeles on Sept. 22, 2000? There are witnesses and photographic evidence.


40 posted on 07/09/2007 8:24:00 PM PDT by doug from upland ((Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

Don’t burn them! Sell them and give the money to FR. I don’t have a problem with Lee being of a different political persuasion. He did great work with noble heroes that inspired kids everywhere. That is a good thing. I have no reasonable explanation why he got involved in this mess.


41 posted on 07/09/2007 8:26:28 PM PDT by doug from upland ((Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

BTTT


42 posted on 07/09/2007 8:27:18 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

What is really so sad about all of this is that Stan Lee Media should have been a mega company worldwide. It was perfectly positioned. Stan had been named as a Master Creator, honored in China, and given certain business advantages possessed by no other entertainment company in the world.

Japanese business partner Tendo Oto had already invested 5 mil for the Japanese joint venture and promised another 5 mil in November 2000 for the American joint venture.

A former president was set to come aboard when he left the White House. He would have raised an incredible amount of money for the company, and the stock would have gone through the roof.

Unfortunately, six days after the witch was elected, the Clintons’ agent, Jim Levin, who had used proprietary information he gained from inside SLM offices, recorded an agreement with Oto in Illinois for himself and silent partner Clinton. When Oto’s money didn’t come in as promised, the company collapsed. Peter tried to save the stock by buying shares at the end of the day to keep the price up. He gave a guilty plea for that stock manipulation.

So far, the Clintons have been off the hook. But it’s not over until it’s over.


43 posted on 07/09/2007 9:02:21 PM PDT by doug from upland ((Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

As the press looks at this case and the bankruptcy, perhaps they will finally see the slimy fingerprints of the Clintons. Jim McDougal said it. Paraphrased — the Clintons are like a tornado that sweeps through people’s lives and leaves destruction in its wake.


44 posted on 07/09/2007 9:11:35 PM PDT by doug from upland ((Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

BOTH!


45 posted on 07/10/2007 5:35:20 AM PDT by Suzy Quzy (Hillary in '08.....Her PHONINESS is GENUINE !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
"Meeting Peter as I stepped off the plane ? Why to discuss why I probably wont go into private business with him.

That doesn't mean we wouldn't accept his political donations."


It also gives Chelsea an "out" as far as hillary setting her up for perjury in the paul case.

IMO, the Lee banckcupcy action wont see light of day for a long time.

When it does, the Clintons are going to hit this thing head on, if they're called in the Lee bankruptcy scam. They can't afford to weasel, it kills 'em. It will boil down to he said-he said.
46 posted on 07/10/2007 6:04:04 AM PDT by stylin19a (Since bad golf shots come in groups of 3, a 4th bad shot is the start of the next group of 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

They had publicly disavowed him as a felon and pretended they were shocked at what they discovered he had done. They publicly said, through their lying weasel Wolfson, that they would take no money from him. No, there is no one reason that, after such conduct, the President of the United States would meet with him. He assured Peter that they still had a deal. Peter sent another 55K to the Working Families Party in NY for her.


47 posted on 07/10/2007 7:36:22 AM PDT by doug from upland ((Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson