Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman
It’s not sufficient for a teacher to simply wave his arms and dismiss ID (or other opposing explanations for the origin of the species) as being “supernatural”. Students need to learn why one explanation is “scientific” and the others not.

At the very least, students should learn why some explanations are “supernatural”. Show them why that’s not an adequate scientific theory. Compare and contrast to the ToE. Show them hypotheses created to test the ToE. Explain that a scientific theory must be falsifiable. Ask them if there are any testable hypotheses that could falsify ID.

While we're at it -- students should also learn about Lysenkoism and Lamarck's theory of evolution. These were not "supernatural" explanations -- both laid claims to being scientific theories. Students should learn why we rejected those theories in favour of Darwin's. (Not just that we did reject the others -- but, why we rejected them.)

If students learn all that -- they're learning science -- and not being simply indoctrinated.

35 posted on 07/14/2007 9:51:27 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
You are right.

When you explain it that way it sounds good.

36 posted on 07/15/2007 7:18:24 AM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson