Skip to comments.
Open Mike Moment Sparks Debate About Debates [Hitlery and the Breck Girl Discuss Rigging Debates]
The New York Times ^
| July 13, 2007
| Michael Falcone
Posted on 07/13/2007 11:06:44 PM PDT by indcons
Congressman Dennis Kucinich accused two of the major contenders for the Democratic nomination, Hillary Rodham Clinton and John Edwards, of participating in a “conspiracy to rig the presidential election,” after they apparently suggested that future presidential debates should be pared down to include fewer candidates.
At the end of a forum with the eight Democratic presidential contenders in Detroit on Thursday, Mr. Edwards walked up to Mrs. Clinton, leaned toward her and said: “We should try to have a more serious … smaller group.”
“We’ve got to cut the number…” Mrs. Clinton responded. “I think there was an effort by our campaigns to do that … it got somehow detoured. We’ve got to get back to it,” and added, “our guys should talk.”
(Excerpt) Read more at thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: breckgirl; dims; edwards; hillary; hitlery; kuchinch; kucinich
Hannity played this on his TV show. Hitlery and the Breck Girl clearly discussed how to limit the debates to three Dims - the two of them and Huseein Obama.
1
posted on
07/13/2007 11:06:47 PM PDT
by
indcons
To: indcons
Breck Girl is too stupid to know he was being set up to take the fall for this.
2
posted on
07/13/2007 11:09:43 PM PDT
by
gov_bean_ counter
( Who is the Democrat's George Galloway?)
To: gov_bean_ counter
3
posted on
07/13/2007 11:15:04 PM PDT
by
indcons
(Liberals, circa 1960s, spat at the troops. Now, they shoot to kill instead.)
To: indcons
If Hillary and Edwards are in cohoots, maybe Hillary wants Edwards for her VP.
4
posted on
07/13/2007 11:17:27 PM PDT
by
Sun
(Duncan Hunter pro-life/borders, understands Red China threat! http://www.gohunter08.com/Home.aspx)
To: indcons
Collusion? Racketeering? I want answers.I want the truth.
5
posted on
07/13/2007 11:17:53 PM PDT
by
Brimack34
(Congress "Go Home Now")
To: indcons
they sure didn’t seem to be hiding their conversation
when both Obama and space-boy walked up to them.
Suddenly they were talking about the lighting in the place?
To: gov_bean_ counter
You would think by now Edwards would be smart enough not to talk at any public event like that. How many officials have been caught by open mikes?
7
posted on
07/13/2007 11:20:16 PM PDT
by
I still care
("Remember... for it is the doom of men that they forget" - Merlin, from Excalibur)
To: indcons
"Open Mike Moment Sparks Debate..."
"Sparks Debate" my butt. That's the same rationalization the Left uses after they do something foul like rub feces on a crucifix.
"It was meant to stimulate debate" they simper. An old, grimy equivocation by the Left. I'd like to throw a pint of beer in some Leftist's face and say "Oh, that was meant to start a discussion".
8
posted on
07/13/2007 11:20:40 PM PDT
by
starbase
(Understanding Written Propaganda (click "starbase" to learn 22 manipulating tricks!!))
To: indcons
In all fairness, if i was one of 2 or 3 leading contenders, I would want the same thing. I think them standing at the podium within earshot was a deliberate calculation on their part.
I would love a Hillary-Silky Pony ticket.
Versus, say, Thompson-Romney.
9
posted on
07/13/2007 11:34:13 PM PDT
by
Eccl 10:2
(Pray for the peace of Jerusalem - Ps 122:6)
To: indcons
accused ... of participating in a conspiracy to rig the presidential election, So many "men" are drama queens these days.
10
posted on
07/13/2007 11:34:22 PM PDT
by
Darkwolf377
(Bostonian, atheist, prolifer, free-speech zealot, pro-legal immigration anti-socialist dude.)
To: Eccl 10:2
In all fairness, if i was one of 2 or 3 leading contenders, I would want the same thing.
But "in all fairness" it's a free election, so no one gets to "reduce" the number of other candidates, even if they would really like to do that.
11
posted on
07/13/2007 11:41:17 PM PDT
by
starbase
(Understanding Written Propaganda (click "starbase" to learn 22 manipulating tricks!!))
To: Sun
... maybe Hillary wants Edwards for her VP.Why would she want somebody who has proven useless as a VP nominee? I believe she'll go with Richardson. NM was the only one that switched from Gore to Bush (substituted for NH, from Bush to Kerry), and Richardson being a Hispanic will be useful for her.
12
posted on
07/13/2007 11:54:29 PM PDT
by
paudio
To: indcons
Lady Macbeth strikes again.
13
posted on
07/13/2007 11:55:32 PM PDT
by
gov_bean_ counter
( Who is the Democrat's George Galloway?)
To: indcons
three dems? you honestly think they wouldn’t ditch Obama too if it weren’t for some one immediately playing the race card if they did? They both think they’re entitled to be president and the work needed to get there is beneath them.
14
posted on
07/13/2007 11:58:15 PM PDT
by
SCHROLL
To: Darkwolf377
So many "men" are drama queens these days.
Fixed it for you, no charge. And here is why, in case there is just one person who has not seen this:
The feminine Edwards.
15
posted on
07/14/2007 12:00:25 AM PDT
by
bajabaja
To: bajabaja
16
posted on
07/14/2007 12:01:10 AM PDT
by
bajabaja
To: potlatch
10x10x1
/X/RED.gif test
17
posted on
07/14/2007 12:16:57 AM PDT
by
devolve
( _Google-Illegals_Killed_25_Americans_Each_Day _A_Mex_Illegal_Alien_Sold_911_Terrorists_IDs_)
To: paudio
I’m getting really tired of people saying things like “Richardson is Hispanic” or “Obama is black” or “Hillary is a woman”, when in actual fact Richardson is exactly half Hispanic and half white, likewise Obama is exactly half black and half white... and furthermore Hitlery is probably only half woman with the other half man, or something.
18
posted on
07/14/2007 1:00:06 AM PDT
by
- Smokestack Lightning
(Track 'em, whack 'em and stack 'em. Let the Lord sort 'em out.)
To: Darkwolf377
"accused ... of participating in a conspiracy to rig the presidential election, I must of missed the Democrat primaries. Is Edwards running as an independent? who won the primaries? Hilary? Is Osama Bin Bama running as an independant too? I can't believe I missed the primaries. Who won the Republican nomination? /s
To: potlatch; Jim Robinson; PhilDragoo; ntnychik; dixiechick2000; Alamo-Girl
GREEN out -
BLUE in
Note sudden illegal BLUE activity from French site
Now who would be interested in blocking internet newsite files?
Detection system blocked 91.164.139.177 at 9:14:38 PM
after 58 attempts to access the server illegally.
This IP is located in Fourmies, Nord-Pas-De-Calais,
France, and probably is a proxy server.
20
posted on
07/14/2007 2:38:46 AM PDT
by
devolve
( _Google-Illegals_Killed_25_Americans_Each_Day _A_Mex_Illegal_Alien_Sold_911_Terrorists_IDs_)
To: Sun
That’s what I was thinking.
21
posted on
07/14/2007 3:40:34 AM PDT
by
blueyon
(Loose lips sink ships.)
To: indcons
Come on. I think the dims are a bunch of excrement bags myself, but allowing these fringe candidates the spotlight is bad for the process. True it will make the tier A candidates go further left which is good for our cause in the general but the likes of Kooky Kucinich demeans the process.
22
posted on
07/14/2007 4:11:58 AM PDT
by
appeal2
(R)
To: Sun
Why would she? He’s already an established loser.
23
posted on
07/14/2007 4:33:38 AM PDT
by
Doohickey
(Giuliani: Brokeback Republican)
To: gov_bean_ counter
Breck Girl is too stupid to know he was being set up to take the fall for this.I think you nailed it.
Hillary is comfortably ahead. She has a lesser chance of screwing up with less air time during debates. This was her tactic during her Senate campaigns --- say very little that can get you in touble.
There is no benefit to Hillary to reduce the field.
Watch her campaign air a 'clarification' statement where she makes Edwards the bad guy and she is in favor of open debates.
24
posted on
07/14/2007 4:43:49 AM PDT
by
Erik Latranyi
(The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
To: gov_bean_ counter
Breck Girl is too stupid to know he was being set up to take the fall for this
This is the same as a vignette from the godfather....edwards (an enemy of the correlones - piaps) is already dead but has yet to be killed off!!!!
To: indcons
From the first comment on the NYT blog: Typically reader.
The Democrat who can stop chemically bombing women and children and shooting the Baghdad residents dead will be the nominee and the three out front have a long way to go. I want sanity, not an enless oil war shooting residents dead in the gutter and call them extremists. Insane greed. Only an arrogant Republican could chemically bomb a nation into rubble and then attack the survivors for not rebuilding the rubble fast enough just the way corporate America would like it. We have a lot of Republicans in the Democratic Party: Clinton, Lieberman, Hoyer, Nelson, Feinstein, Clyborn, Lambreaux, Reid, Durbin and many more spineless corporate robots. Clinton and Edwards lost my vote a long time ago. Edwards it talking about primary ed in Africa. Enough. America is shooting Baghdad residents dead in the face while racist maniacs discuss how long we need to keep murdering them to make us look better. INSANITY AMERICA. REVOLT!!
Posted by bob
26
posted on
07/14/2007 5:11:21 AM PDT
by
Popman
(I removed my Bushbot brain chip after he didn't veto the McCain Feingold election anti freedom bill)
To: - Smokestack Lightning
“...Richardson is exactly half Hispanic and half white...”
Hispanics come in all shades (skin tones) just like Americans.
To: - Smokestack Lightning
To: devolve
To: devolve
Quite a serious hacking job. It’s been down for almost 18 hours now!!
30
posted on
07/14/2007 12:40:17 PM PDT
by
potlatch
(MIZARU_ooo_(Ώ)_ooo_MIKAZARU_ooo_(Ώ)_ooo_MAZARU_ooo_(Ώ)_ooo_))
To: devolve; - Smokestack Lightning
Ummmmm, you forgot to comment on Edwards! Snicker
31
posted on
07/14/2007 12:42:34 PM PDT
by
potlatch
(MIZARU_ooo_(Ώ)_ooo_MIKAZARU_ooo_(Ώ)_ooo_MAZARU_ooo_(Ώ)_ooo_))
To: devolve
Lol, ‘red’ test still in failure mode!
32
posted on
07/14/2007 12:43:46 PM PDT
by
potlatch
(MIZARU_ooo_(Ώ)_ooo_MIKAZARU_ooo_(Ώ)_ooo_MAZARU_ooo_(Ώ)_ooo_))
To: I still care
33
posted on
07/14/2007 12:58:16 PM PDT
by
lowbridge
(If Youre Gonna Burn Our Flag, Wrap Yourself in It First /No Oil for Pacifists)
To: potlatch
I’m trying to stay out of rehab.
34
posted on
07/14/2007 2:03:20 PM PDT
by
- Smokestack Lightning
(Track 'em, whack 'em and stack 'em. Let the Lord sort 'em out.)
To: indcons
What is a little disturbing here is they had this conversation right in front of the podium microphone. Public people like this are warned of these things by their own handlers all the time.
And these people are running for President of the United States?
Scary.
35
posted on
07/14/2007 2:13:59 PM PDT
by
dragnet2
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson