Protesters to converge on North America summit

World Net Daily ^ | June 20, 2007

[JSDude1]

maybe they can borrow some of the “anti-globalist” protesters of the left that protested the world-bank (which I am also against..), defeat these globalists. If both the left and right ARE against it; then maybe it’s a ‘bad idea’!

[JSDude1]

I believe this globalist ‘vision’ is actually a fulfillment of “marxism”; it is seperating people into ‘class’ (and seeing them as mainly ‘man=material’: The globalists want ‘slaves’ to work their corporatations with only subsistance level work (and their purpose in life only being ‘to get by’); make money for their ‘masters’. I won’t enter into their system, Instead of their view I Prefer the ‘Traditional American vision of getting ahead (joining the ‘rich’) through hard work, and God’s Providence). I want to see people as individuals, not ‘members of a group, or class..’.

[processing please hold]

maybe they can borrow some of the “anti-globalist” protesters of the left that protested the world-bank

Good idea. A cause for them to sink their teeth into.

If both the left and right ARE against it; then maybe it’s a ‘bad idea’!

That one statement should tell everyone just what a danger this thing is.

The left and the right hated and fought against shamnesty, and we won. It's going to take both side again to fight it.

[penowa]

"Reagan had 287 CFR and Trilateral Commission members in his Administration."

I don't believe that any man can be elected President and not be forced to accept these people into the Administration. They are our permanent gov't. while the elected officials come and go. When Reagan took George Bush as his V.P., that certainly sent many an unmistakable message about who was in charge. Viguerie had the rug pulled out from under him and said so. Lots of Freepers are p.o.'d that he is pointing out that nominating Fred will result in the same disappointment conservatives always get. It's only a matter of degree, and we have no excuse to act surprised when it happens over and over again because we refuse to accept reality until it can no longer be denied.

[processing please hold]

I don't believe that any man can be elected President and not be forced to accept these people into the Administration.

No one, not you nor me nor the president of the United States is forced to accept anyone into their lives whose ambitions and goals usurp our ideas for theirs.

They are our permanent gov't. while the elected officials come and go.

They aren't government, no one elected them to their organization. They are private clubs with no legislative oversight. You think the American citizens voted to admit people into their groups? To the Trilateral Commission? The Council on Foreign Relations? The Security and Prosperity Partnership?

Please, check them out before you make such a statement as their being elected.

Lots of Freepers are p.o.'d that he is pointing out that nominating Fred will result in the same disappointment conservatives always get. It's only a matter of degree, and we have no excuse to act surprised when it happens over and over again because we refuse to accept reality until it can no longer be denied.

If Thompson's elected I won't be surprised when it happens. I learned my lesson from trusting Bush to be the conservative he said he was instead of the compassionate conservative he now says he is.

[JSDude1]

You know I believe you; it just shows that the globalists are the real “owners” of the GOP, lock-stock-and-barrel! We conservatives no longer (or maybe we really never did) controll the GOP, they just “US” use for their votes; they like their coctails, but they care diddly about the average American and have no real loyalty to the traditional American nation!

[processing please hold]

In your coming across articles such as this, have either of you stumbled across something called, 'North American Court of Justice?'

I've only seen a couple of sentences where this was mentioned. This new North American Court of Justice will have the power to override our Supreme Court decisions.

[processing please hold]

Here's what I have.

Overruling the U.S. Supreme Court

Academic literature distributed in advance to conference participants about a common legal framework for the U.S., Canada and Mexico included proposals for a North American Court of Justice (with the authority to overrule a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court), a North American Trade Tribunal, a North American Court of Justice, and a Charter of Fundamental Human Rights for North America, also dubbed the North American Social Charter.

Under the latter concept, according to Laura Spitz of the University of Colorado Law School, North Americans might be able to enjoy "new rights" essential to "human flourishing" such as gay marriage. She argues in one paper that U.S. economic integration with Canada will make it nearly impossible for the United States not to recognize same-sex marriage so long as it is lawful in Canada.

[nicmarlo]

no...I never heard of this one before.

pinging to post #68.....North American Court of Justice (with the authority to overrule a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court)

Were/are any of you aware of this "North American Court of Justice"?

[processing please hold]

Look what else I found.

Just put the paragraphs together.

Robert Pastor, a top Democratic Party foreign policy specialist associated with the Panama Canal giveaway, denies that he is at the center of a "vast conspiracy" to subvert American sovereignty under the cover of establishing a "North American Union." Pastor says that he favors a "North American Community," not a formal union. But his Center for North American Studies (CNAS) sponsored an all-day February 16, 2007, conference devoted to the development of a North American legal system. The holding of the conference was itself evidence that a comprehensive process is underway to merge the economies, and perhaps the social and political systems, of the three countries.

Wearing a lapel pin featuring the flags of the U.S., Canada and Mexico, Pastor said that he favors a $200 billion North American Investment Fund to pull Mexico out of poverty. Rather than a border fence, he favors a national biometric identity card for the purpose of controlling the movement of people in and out of the U.S.

The Role of the United Nations

The United Nations is now funding Pastor’s Center for North American Studies (CNAS) through the U.N.’s Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). [16] Pastor was a consultant to ECLAC from 1991-1993. [17] The U.N. funding is to address "regulatory convergence" issues.

At the same time, Mexico frequently threatens to go to the U.N. to stop any U.S. move to crack down on illegal immigration.

Our tax dollars at the un are paying this traitorous bastard.

[wtc911]

Go to www.spp.gov (that’s right - gov) and see what Bush has planned for your children.

[nicmarlo]

Pastor says that he favors a "North American Community," not a formal union. But his Center for North American Studies (CNAS) sponsored an all-day February 16, 2007, conference devoted to the development of a North American legal system. The holding of the conference was itself evidence that a comprehensive process is underway to merge the economies, and perhaps the social and political systems, of the three countries.

Could someone please get out your ping lists for post numbers 68 and 70????

[nicmarlo]

good work and great find, pph!

[processing please hold]

Thank you.

[stephenjohnbanker]

“Were/are any of you aware of this “North American Court of Justice”?”

Not I

[dragnet2]

Isn’t that wonderful.

[hedgetrimmer]

The United Nations is now funding Pastor’s Center for North American Studies (CNAS) through the U.N.’s Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). [16] Pastor was a consultant to ECLAC from 1991-1993. [17] The U.N. funding is to address "regulatory convergence" issues.

I think you'll find ELAC is involved with the FTAA and the OAS, and the Western Hemispheric Transportation Initiative (the whole hemisphere from south america to the north) and other sovereignty stealing organizations.

[nicmarlo]

BTW, this North American Investment Fund is already a done deal.

It's called the North American Development Bank.

The NADB was created by the United States and Mexico, under NAFTA, in a joint effort to preserve and promote the health and welfare of border residents and their environment.

Organization

Under the Charter, the BECC and NADB have a shared Board of Directors, while each institution has its own officers and staff.

Board of Directors

The BECC-NADB Board of Directors consists of ten members: five from the United States and five from Mexico. The chairmanship of the board alternates between U.S. and Mexican representatives every year.
(MANY BOARD MEMBERS ARE MEMBERS ON THE COUNCIL OF FOREIGN RELATIONS)

[hedgetrimmer]

Typing too quick--

ECLAC.

Clinton Signs a New Constitution

CLINTON SIGNS A "NEW CONSTITUTION" FOR THE 21ST CENTURY CREATING A PARTNERSHIP TO INTEGRATE THE 34 COUNTRIES OF THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE BY 2005

Report by Joan Veon, Journalist to the Summit of the Americas

Under the Summit of the Americas and the Free Trade Areas of the Americas signed by Clinton on April 19 1998, climate warming is a done deal, sustainable development is a done deal, the ratification of UN treaties which the U.S. Senate has not ratified are a done deal, adherence to international law is a given and the Constitution is a piece of paper. In short, Bill Clinton gave a whole new meaning to the song, "Only in America."

The integration of the 34 countries will be done on several levels:

(1) the integration of actions by the various ministers--trade, education, finance, etc.;

(2) the signing of "bilateral" agreements between the U.S. and Chile, the U.S. and Brazil, the U.S. and Mexico, the U.S. and (rest of the 34 countries) in which they agree to work together to open markets, and the other processes of government between the two governments, and

(3) the signing of the Free Trade Areas of the Americas which is a public private partnership.

It should be noted that just as America will sign bi-lateral accords with the other 33 countries, so too will each of the 33 countries sign bi-lateral accords with the other 33 countries so that by the time they are done, 1,089 bi-lateral accords will have been signed to integrate the countries into one.

[nicmarlo]

Apparently, Pastor’s still being a very busy little man. He held a conference on forming this just this past February.