Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

General Dynamics delivers first MRAP vehicles designed to deflect blasts from IEDs
General Dynamics ^ | Jul 11, 2007

Posted on 07/15/2007 12:13:56 PM PDT by bnelson44

General Dynamics Land Systems, a business unit of General Dynamics, has delivered its first Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles to the U.S. Marine Corps from Anniston, Ala., less than 120 days after the company received its first production order for the new product.

The vehicle's unique, V-shaped hull is designed to deflect the force of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) blast away from the vehicle, keeping soldiers inside safe and alive. General Dynamics and its our partners, Force Protection, Anniston Army Depot and local subcontractors, are engaged in building these vehicles while increasing its combined production capacity to deliver 1000 vehicles per month.

The 80,000-square foot main General Dynamics assembly site for MRAP vehicles will eventually employ 220 new workers in Oxford, Ala. A supporting production site at the Anniston Army Depot will employ 50 new workers. General Dynamics Land Systems currently employs 240 workers at the depot building Fox and Stryker combat vehicles and the Abrams tank gunner's primary sight. Anniston Army Depot will partner with General Dynamics and perform a share of the MRAP work. General Dynamics also contracted with BR Williams to operate a warehouse in Oxford to support the new production operations.

General Dynamics currently employs approximately 700 workers throughout Alabama. These new positions will increase total General Dynamics' employment in the state to nearly 1000. Force Protection is a ballistics research and manufacturing enterprise, specializing in the development and production of highly-reinforced armored personnel carriers.


TOPICS: Extended News; US: Alabama
KEYWORDS: defensecontractors; generaldynamics; ied; iraq; mrap
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: mamelukesabre

Looks like they might be selling them to NGOs

http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htarm/articles/20070327.aspx


41 posted on 07/15/2007 1:44:50 PM PDT by bnelson44 (http://www.appealforcourage.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RG-31

This looks an awful lot like a couger. I wonder if the south africans invented the concept first.


42 posted on 07/15/2007 1:46:05 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Those that can do, do. Those that can't do, teach. Those that can't do either, run for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
The vehicle's unique, V-shaped hull

V shaped hulls are now the standard, rather than being unique.

43 posted on 07/15/2007 1:48:03 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
I’m afraid the first 37 posters so far have missed the point. From a Democratic standpoint what is this vehicle’s carbon footprint? All well and good to use it to increase the 700,000 Iraqi dead (Cindy Sheehan source on YouTube) by Imperialists protecting big oil, but such heavy fuel guzzlers are destroying the planet.
Robert Kennedy should open congressional hearings immediately to investigate the flat earthers that came up with such a global warming danger.

Amazing. Could it be the fluoride in the water did have an effect after all? SO many people voting Democratic. SO many people believing the surge and the war is lost.

If I had the cash I would buy one and drive it to the grocery store every day with a Dick Cheney ‘08 sticker on the back.

44 posted on 07/15/2007 1:51:59 PM PDT by IrishCatholic (No local communist or socialist party chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
Super-jeep.

No, more the role of the half tracks.

45 posted on 07/15/2007 1:53:47 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: IrishCatholic

To be fair, one of the most outspoken advocates of this vehicle is Senator Joe Biden.

But there is an issue. We want 1,000 vehicles a month, but that’s 4,000 tons of steel. The question is, do we have enough industrial capacity?


46 posted on 07/15/2007 2:10:27 PM PDT by bnelson44 (http://www.appealforcourage.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
No, more the role of the half tracks.

I agree. My son calls his Hummvee a "truck". I have never thought of it as a truck. However the Cougar is a truck.

47 posted on 07/15/2007 2:12:37 PM PDT by bnelson44 (http://www.appealforcourage.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada is teaming with BAE Systems Ground Systems Division, to offer vehicles to the Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) program. GDLS Canada will provide the program management and logistic support while South African based BAE Systems Land Systems OMC will manufacture the vehicles in BAE Systems' facilities in York, Pennsylvania. For the MRAP program the team is offering the RG- 31 Mk5, the latest version of the highly successful RG-31 vehicle family, offering significant increase in power and payload while enhancing mine blast resistance and protection against both improvised explosive devices and ballistic threats. General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada is providing vehicles for both Category I and Category II requirements of the MRAP program under this contract.


Force Protection, Inc. and General Dynamics Land Systems are forming a joint venture to offer the Cougar 4x4 and 6x6 armored vehicles for the Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicle program, a U.S. joint services program being managed by the U.S. Marine Corps. The joint venture was formed to offer Force Protection's Cougar 4x4 and 6x6 armored vehicles as an MRAP solution. The joint venture called Force Dynamics will include an experienced team in program management, systems engineering, production and service support from both Force Protection and General Dynamics. The companies are already cooperating in the fabrication of the armored capsule for the Cougar.


The 1st Marine Expeditionary Force requested 1,169 MRAP vehicles. The program calls for a commercially available off-road and highway capable armor and mine protected vehicle, configured for personnel, cargo and litter transportation. The vehicle should have a payload capacity of 5000 lbs, and will be able to carry 6 – 10 troops. The vehicle will be configured to carry existing gunner protected turrets or remotely controlled weapon stations, enabling the gunner to load, operate and engage targets from fully protected positions. To improve recovery after mine damage, the vehicle will be built of modular components that could break away from the vehicle in the case of a blast. Its energy absorbing seats should be capable of withstanding the accelerative effects of mine blasts.

The armor protection of the vehicle include mine protection and ballistic protection of the full, roof protection from overhead airburst and side protection against fragmentation and blast. The transparent armor windows will have protection level equal to or greater than that of the ballistic armor on the vehicle, and will have built-in gun-ports. RPG protection could also be an option.

http://www.defense-update.com/newscast/0107/news/310107_mrap_jv.htm

48 posted on 07/15/2007 2:18:50 PM PDT by bnelson44 (http://www.appealforcourage.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
Image hosted by Photobucket.com Steel Wheels...














49 posted on 07/15/2007 2:54:06 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
The South Africans built these IED resistant vehicles....35 years ago. Nice to see the rocket scientists and the thousands of Generals and all the paper-shufflers have come up to speed. Everything should be squared away by the time we are ready to leave, whereupon military bureaucracy can resume it’s slumbers.
50 posted on 07/15/2007 2:59:43 PM PDT by Leisler (Just be glad your not getting all the Government you pay for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Is that the one?

I think the other two pictured in the thread are it. Thought what I had was until I saw the others (the real big picture and the smaller one of the same vehicle).

51 posted on 07/15/2007 3:02:48 PM PDT by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

Speaking of, they need something like a light tank with the same protection. An MIAI has a soft underbelly.


52 posted on 07/15/2007 3:04:20 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Leisler

Right on—unfortunately. Why do I think that every third general in the Army ought to be retired tomorrow and not replaced?


53 posted on 07/15/2007 3:06:58 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
Heres somebody using the current stuff in an anti-IED role. I check his blog daily and recommend it to anyone that will listen.
http://acutepolitics.blogspot.com/index.html
54 posted on 07/15/2007 3:14:04 PM PDT by Uriah_lost ("build bridges where you can - but draw lines where you must." -Fred D Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

The US needs to rush these vehicles as fast as they can be made to our guys. IEDs (a weapon used by Islamic cowards) kill so many soldiers. The Pentagon should make it the highest priority to make these in large numbers!


55 posted on 07/15/2007 3:16:17 PM PDT by Doctor Don
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Don

Doctor Don,
This project is DoD Sec Gates highest priority.


56 posted on 07/15/2007 3:18:41 PM PDT by bnelson44 (http://www.appealforcourage.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Lil'freeper; big'ol_freeper

Hmmmm... What happened to the evaluation?

DoD just buys it now (pig in a poke)?


57 posted on 07/15/2007 3:21:15 PM PDT by sauropod (Driving 100 mph in a Pious with the sunroof open)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

As they try to build and emplace new and larger IEDs they spend more time at it and are more vulnerable. Larger IEDs will also be easier to spot. We are capable of outdoing anything they come up with and our men and women in the fight will exploit their vulnerabilities. It’s how long wars are fought.


58 posted on 07/15/2007 3:25:10 PM PDT by Uriah_lost ("build bridges where you can - but draw lines where you must." -Fred D Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Uriah_lost

Thanks for posting the link at # 54.


59 posted on 07/15/2007 3:30:27 PM PDT by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

This vehicle appears to be great for ordinary explosive charges directly under them, but I would like to see it take a blast from the side - where most IEDS are. What happens when the terrorists start using more armor piercing mines - the ones with deforming copper projectiles?


60 posted on 07/15/2007 3:37:35 PM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson