Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney spent $300 on makeup 'consulting'
The Politico ^ | July 16, 2007 | Kenneth P. Vogel

Posted on 07/16/2007 10:50:48 PM PDT by gpapa

What kinds of things do you think of when you hear "communications consulting"?

Speechwriting? Message strategy?

Well, "communications consulting" is how presidential candidate Mitt Romney recorded $300 in payments to a California company that describes itself as "a mobile beauty team for hair, makeup and men's grooming and spa services."

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: makeup; masschusetts; mittromney; romney

1 posted on 07/16/2007 10:50:49 PM PDT by gpapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gpapa

My tires cost more.


2 posted on 07/16/2007 10:52:12 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

did someone defect from edwards’ campaign and sign on with romney?


3 posted on 07/16/2007 10:53:19 PM PDT by thefactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

Don’t vote for a man who can’t do his own hair!


4 posted on 07/16/2007 10:54:16 PM PDT by Tamar1973 (Riding the Korean Wave, one BYJ movie at a time! (http://www.byj.co.kr))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

Clinton’s haircut cost more. So did Edward’s shampoo. Then, there’s Hillary’s face lift . . .


5 posted on 07/16/2007 10:55:02 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

It is widely believed that make up made the difference in the Kennedy Nixon debates 0f 1960. Everybody on TV is made up.


6 posted on 07/16/2007 10:59:56 PM PDT by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

Once a day I wash everything. Once a month I run electric clippers over everything above my neck. If that doesn’t make me pretty, to Hell with it!


7 posted on 07/16/2007 11:01:56 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS A MATTER OF FACT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gpapa
So what?

You can't even get a good haircut for that price! (sarcasm)

8 posted on 07/16/2007 11:03:08 PM PDT by airborne (If there were no polls, and you had to go on a candidate's record alone, who would you vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tamar1973
click
9 posted on 07/16/2007 11:05:21 PM PDT by monkapotamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt
It is widely believed that make up made the difference in the Kennedy Nixon debates 0f 1960. Everybody on TV is made up.

That settles it then.

Giuliani is certain to win.


10 posted on 07/16/2007 11:08:22 PM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: monkapotamus

Bush has shorter hair. Maybe Edwards can learn something from that!


11 posted on 07/16/2007 11:09:21 PM PDT by Tamar1973 (Riding the Korean Wave, one BYJ movie at a time! (http://www.byj.co.kr))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Polybius

12 posted on 07/16/2007 11:10:47 PM PDT by monkapotamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Haha, how true. I’m on more of a two week schedule for the “everything above the neck” event. The beard gets itchy.


13 posted on 07/16/2007 11:19:14 PM PDT by TheZMan (Texas is no place for pansy-ass liberals. Ya'll move back to California er Mexico er somethin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

If NIXON had, he would have won in 1960.


14 posted on 07/16/2007 11:20:41 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Open Borders and Shamnesty!/Appeasement of North Korea!/No Win Wars!--I've HAD IT WITH BUSH!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

And your point is?


15 posted on 07/16/2007 11:27:04 PM PDT by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gpapa
Bee Eff Dee. In 2000, Al Gore paid Naomi Wolf $15,000 a month to -- among other things -- recommend that he wear "earth tones."

I guess this is supposed to blunt criticism of John Edwards' expensive hair excursions as he talks about the gap between the rich and poor. It doesn't.

16 posted on 07/16/2007 11:36:03 PM PDT by L.N. Smithee (Has George W. Bush been taking Carter's Little Pills?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: restornu

I do not have an issue with Romney. I did not write the article.


17 posted on 07/16/2007 11:37:52 PM PDT by gpapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

I thought it was limp compared with what some of these guys do!


18 posted on 07/16/2007 11:41:05 PM PDT by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: monkapotamus

The Edwards make-up/hairstyling video is morphing into different forms and becoming its own mini-internet-phenomenon.


19 posted on 07/16/2007 11:42:14 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER
Once a month I run electric clippers over everything above my neck.

Yep. I have Great Clips go over my head about once a month with a "number 4" attachment on the clippers. Nice and simple.

20 posted on 07/17/2007 12:04:05 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

No barber shops for 45 years, I wonder how much I’ve saved.


21 posted on 07/17/2007 12:07:21 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS A MATTER OF FACT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: gpapa
So freeking what. I spend more on a date just to get lucky,
and I don't even shave first. /$300. BAH!
22 posted on 07/17/2007 12:09:59 AM PDT by MaxMax (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER
I pay about $15 for a no frills haircut, including the tip I throw in. That's about $180/year.
23 posted on 07/17/2007 12:36:26 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: thefactor

Romney-Edwards 2008

The Hair Team


24 posted on 07/17/2007 12:50:14 AM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

“...What kinds of things do you think of when you hear “communications consulting”?...”

Applying lipstick to a pig?


25 posted on 07/17/2007 1:06:15 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (What would Beowulf do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

They never mentioned Kerry’s botox.
Nor the silky pony’s - or the fact that silky pony pays over $400.00 for a haircut.


26 posted on 07/17/2007 1:59:13 AM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
Clinton’s haircut cost more. So did Edward’s shampoo. Then, there’s Hillary’s face lift . . .

And Kerry's Botox... and Uncle Albert's orange rouge....

27 posted on 07/17/2007 2:34:58 AM PDT by Lil'freeper (You do not have the plug-in required to view this tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gpapa
$300 in payments

$150 x 2 = $300. Reasonable price for a service that makes housecalls.

28 posted on 07/17/2007 4:06:19 AM PDT by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

You get what you pay for. Let’s face it, the dude has great hair!


29 posted on 07/17/2007 4:35:58 AM PDT by period end of story (What is the antonym of competition?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Whoa! Someone call the homosexual-police! I think we have a wolf in sheep’s clothing!


30 posted on 07/17/2007 5:58:38 AM PDT by jootz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

If you consider the amount of money that public figures need to spend on speech coaches, demographic research, tailoring, etc., $300 sounds like a pretty shrewd investment if you ask me.


31 posted on 07/17/2007 6:17:44 AM PDT by Huber (And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. - John 1:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jootz

I’m guessing that you have never had to appear on camera.


32 posted on 07/17/2007 6:21:57 AM PDT by Huber (And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. - John 1:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: gpapa
From the gossip rag the has brought us eight — and counting — articles on John Edwards' haircut, we have more critical news!

Does anyone know where we can find a working press? Ours is broken.

33 posted on 07/17/2007 9:40:28 AM PDT by Mr. Know It All (Quicumque vult salvus esse, ante omnia opus est, ut teneat catholicam fidem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

At least Romney is straight, whereas the Breck girl is of indeterminate gender, lol.


34 posted on 07/17/2007 12:00:09 PM PDT by stellarfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

When a consultant makes a call they charge a minimum — usually 4 hours. That makes it $75.00 per hour — cheap!


35 posted on 07/17/2007 12:02:54 PM PDT by Beckwith (dhimmicrats and the liberal media have chosen sides -- Islamofascism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: restornu

restornu, the point is that Mitt paid for a haircut and makeup job and called it “communications consulting” rather than a haircut and makeup job, perhaps to dodge Edwards-like criticism.

Not as bad as taking money from the American Museum Council but even if the bowl aint as big the flavor is the same.


36 posted on 07/18/2007 6:09:42 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DBrow; gpapa; SteveMcKing; Tamar1973; Vigilanteman; elli1
restornu, the point is that Mitt paid for a haircut and makeup job and called it “communications consulting” rather than a haircut and makeup job, perhaps to dodge Edwards-like criticism.

Not as bad as taking money from the American Museum Council but even if the bowl aint as big the flavor is the same.

So he hired experts to advice him what's with you people

You are showing your ignorance this is what they call it in the field of Presentation "Communications Consulting" those who appear on TV and give speeches it is all part of the package.

37 posted on 07/18/2007 9:32:45 AM PDT by restornu (I never said I did not accept Fred, I just pointed out that Fredheads lives in a glass houses too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: gpapa
I agree, this is seemingly trivial, but it was silly of Mitt to let this show up on traceable campaign documents. If he really felt he needed makeup advice, he should have been smart enough to have paid the lousy three big ones out of his own pocket as a personal expense, as it would have been for any of the rest of us.

Has he been unaware of the drubbing that Edwards takes for his own beauty expenses? I would think that the "I Feel Pretty" YouTube video of Edwards primping would be used at least once a week by all Republican candidates' staffs as a tension reliever!

38 posted on 07/18/2007 9:59:12 AM PDT by hunter112 (Change will happen when very good men are forced to do very bad things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hunter112

Just because we don’t travel in those area of communication does not mean how he categorized it is correct when it is a part of the package.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1867065/posts?page=37#37


39 posted on 07/18/2007 10:15:18 AM PDT by restornu (I never said I did not accept Fred, I just pointed out that Fredheads lives in a glass houses too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: restornu
It’s actually pretty clever on Mitt’s part. He knows full well that if he got a $300 haircut he’d be compared to Edwards, so he tried to cover the expense in another way. So it came out anyway, and the media is trying to make it look like Mitt was trying to hide a $300 haircut (which, I think, he was).

People in the public eye frequently spend big bucks on appearance- even Edwards does not deserve to be criticized (Clinton was too). I agree with you on that, anybody whose job it is to be in public does (or should do, Dennis Kucinich!) the same thing. I bet Jay Leno spends more than $300 per week on hair and makeup. When I give a talk at a university or present a paper at a conference I at least get a trim (if Kerry was going to be in the audience I’d get a manicure too).

Since it is so common, though, there is no reason to attempt to obfuscate the issues.

40 posted on 07/18/2007 10:18:24 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

Correction

Just because we don’t travel in those area of communication does not mean how he categorized it is not correct when it is a part of the package.


41 posted on 07/18/2007 10:18:33 AM PDT by restornu (I never said I did not accept Fred, I just pointed out that Fredheads lives in a glass houses too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

What is Romney supposed to do, go on TV with a haggard appearance, like Nixon in that 1960 debate with JFK?


42 posted on 07/18/2007 10:20:44 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

Maybe in your bookkeeping and I bet there is another name in corporate world for bookkeeping too!

Just like computer talk it does not use terms that average person is familiar with.

To me it is a whole new world of terminology


43 posted on 07/18/2007 10:25:44 AM PDT by restornu (I never said I did not accept Fred, I just pointed out that Fredheads lives in a glass houses too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

That’s not a bad price, really, for something that is quite important. Hell, it’s less than a john edwards haircut.


44 posted on 07/18/2007 10:28:14 AM PDT by Clam Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gpapa; DBrow; SteveMcKing; Tamar1973; Vigilanteman; elli1
Why did you excerpt this article when it did not require it?

Romney spent $300 on makeup 'consulting'

By: Kenneth P. Vogel Jul 16, 2007 06:57 PM EST

Romney's makeup payment is just one example of the interesting nuggets that await those willing to dig through the thousands of entries in campaign finance reports. Photo by AP

What kinds of things do you think of when you hear "communications consulting"?

Speechwriting? Message strategy?

Well, "communications consulting" is how presidential candidate Mitt Romney recorded $300 in payments to a California company that describes itself as "a mobile beauty team for hair, makeup and men's grooming and spa services."

Romney spokesman Kevin Madden confirmed that the payments -- actually two separate $150 charges -- were for makeup, though he said the former Massachusetts governor had only one session with Hidden Beauty of West Hills, Calif. That was before the May 3 Republican presidential debate at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, Calif., co-sponsored by MSNBC and The Politico.

"We used them once but booked time twice and still had to render payment for the appointment time," said Madden, who said the disbursement was listed as "communications consulting" because it was paid from the communications division's budget.

Romney's makeup payment is just one example of the interesting nuggets that await those willing to dig through the thousands of entries in campaign finance reports filed with the Federal Election Commission.

It's unclear if other presidential candidates paid for makeup services in the period covered by the latest round of reports, due Sunday night. If they did, though, it might not be obvious from a quick glance of the filings.

Politicians often wear makeup for photo and video shoots. Federal campaigns, on at least 26 different occasions since 2002, reported paying for haircuts and other primping -- services totaling $7,443, according to an analysis by The Politico of Federal Election Commission data. And Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards refunded $800 his campaign shelled out for two haircuts after he was criticized for them.

But Stacy Andrews, who made up Romney for Hidden Beauty, said he barely needs makeup.

"He's already tan," she said. "We basically put a drop of foundation on him … and we powdered him a little bit."

It's not wise for candidates -- or anyone appearing on TV, for that matter -- to scrimp on makeup, especially in this age of high-definition TV, she said, adding that she has seen pols "look orange" after bad makeup jobs.

45 posted on 07/18/2007 10:44:34 AM PDT by restornu (I never said I did not accept Fred, I just pointed out that Fredheads lives in a glass houses too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

46 posted on 07/18/2007 10:47:16 AM PDT by P.O.E. (School's Out. Drive Safely)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: restornu

LOL! Now who could she mean by “looking orange”?

Good work, restornu!


47 posted on 07/18/2007 11:03:30 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: restornu
Just because we don’t travel in those area of communication does not mean how he categorized it is correct when it is a part of the package.

You're right, we don't 'travel' in that area, and neither does the average American. Mitt needs to hire somebody to be an 'everyman' that he runs things by for the smell test. It might have prevented that 'hunter all my life' gaffe that he made a few months ago.

I just know that if we discussed some unknown guy who spent $300 on makeup consultation, most FReepers would refer to such a fellow as a metrosexual. Mitt needs to be aware of that, it smacks of Al Gore getting alpha male training during the 2000 campaign. It might be completely wrong of me to feel this way, but a real man doesn't need to hire consultants to tell him how to act like a man, if he hasn't already figured it out on his climb up the corporate ladder.

48 posted on 07/18/2007 11:09:49 AM PDT by hunter112 (Change will happen when very good men are forced to do very bad things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: hunter112

It has nothing to do with metro, unless one does not want to look like pale face one need to wear some make up and have a good hairs style that is photo genetic.

It has nothing to do with Edwards or Al Gore endless primping even Hannity, Rush, GWB before going on TV takes these precaution those who don’t are foolish,

Look what happen to Duncan Hunter a good man received no traction because his looks came across as dumpy!

There is a video out there of Hunter where he was groomed it gave him a cohesive look a pull togather, organized being.

In this day and age you can’t have a sloppy unkempt look it don’t sell it is a turn off.

Edwards and Al Gore need to do these things for their self worth, I assure you Mitt has confidence but is also wise to take council if that is what is need do it, but he does not dwell on it.

If he did dwell on it would have been more than $150 he paid $300 because that was the consultant requirement but he only used one session!


49 posted on 07/18/2007 12:18:08 PM PDT by restornu (I never said I did not accept Fred, I just pointed out that Fredheads lives in a glass houses too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: restornu
Your points are good, but we all know how Democrat missteps are minimized, and Republican gaffes (or perceived gaffes) are magnified by the media. I certainly don't want to blame Mitt for not wanting to do a Nixon (a la 1960!) and failing to appreciate that we live in a television age. But if this story gets any traction beyond the blogosphere, he may regret getting his consulting in a way that was too easy for his opponents to dig up.

Mitt's a smart guy, I give him credit for his accomplishments. I also acknowledge that he's done well at the debates, I've always seen positive reviews of him by both conservative and liberals alike. He just needs to avoid the things that chip away at the image of leadership that he's adept at portraying.

50 posted on 07/18/2007 2:22:59 PM PDT by hunter112 (Change will happen when very good men are forced to do very bad things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson