Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/18/2007 10:05:06 PM PDT by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: freedomdefender

There has been no mention about the cost of ads. I know that our local paper charges an arm and a leg for a small ad. I’m curious whether the papers are driving away advertisers by raising their rates to offset the loss in the number of ads.


28 posted on 07/19/2007 4:53:04 AM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freedomdefender

Newspapers must be saved. For the puppies !!!!

( What else will they pee on ? )


32 posted on 07/19/2007 5:41:20 AM PDT by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freedomdefender
Can't remember where I saw this. Perhaps someone's tagline?

Newspapers and TV news - One way mediums in a two-way world.

37 posted on 07/19/2007 6:32:14 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedys: Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat; but they know what's best for us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freedomdefender
About 85% of newspaper revenue comes from advertisments. Sales are important not as a source of revenue, but rather, for circulation numbers that drive ad revenue, i.e., the greater the circulation, the more you can charge for ads. We are starting to see US newspapers being distributed for free similar to what has been happening to a greater degree in Europe. The money is in advertising, not sales.

The problem with the print media is that people can use the internet and cable TV to get their news. And the younger generation is moving away from the print media because they have grown up with the new technology. Newspaper readers are older and they are dying out.

The newspapers are also torn between how they use their ad revenue, i.e., on the internet for their online edition or in the printed version. In some ways, the demise of the print media is not a good thing. Newspapers are a good vehicle to educate the public on issues in-depth. They also have the advantage of portability, but wireless technology is even competing with that.

The future of print newspapers is bleak.

38 posted on 07/19/2007 6:34:02 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freedomdefender
...not so much a result of competition from the Web as of economic woes affecting certain categories of advertisers. Real-estate classifieds, until recently a bright spot for the industry, have plunged along with the property market. Auto and employment classifieds are also sinking.

Nonsense.

Over a year ago, I advertised an auto for sale in the Marxist Sacramento Bee. The add ran 2 (two) weeks, and I got 1 (one) bona fide call of interest. Then, I listed in Craig's list, got an avalanche of calls, and sold the car within days.

Car and house advertising will follow the cost/benefit pressure. It's that simple.

The "news" papers will obediently follow their rigid, America-hating dogma to the end, blaming everyone and everything but their Marxist selves.

43 posted on 07/19/2007 9:09:48 AM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freedomdefender
AWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

It'd be too damn bad if the NY Slimes went down the gutter. Wait, I mean further down the gutter.

47 posted on 07/20/2007 6:38:21 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson