Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

From Wales, a box to make biofuel from car fumes
Reuters/Yahoo ^ | 7/19/2007 | Michael Szabo

Posted on 07/19/2007 11:12:13 AM PDT by Uncledave

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
Latest gizmo on the drawing board -- looking for investors.


1 posted on 07/19/2007 11:12:14 AM PDT by Uncledave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RedStateRocker; Dementon; eraser2005; Calpernia; DTogo; Maelstrom; Yehuda; babble-on; ...
Renewable Energy Ping

Please Freep Mail me if you'd like on/off

2 posted on 07/19/2007 11:12:44 AM PDT by Uncledave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

three fishing buddies in North Wales “after drinking 13 pints each at the local pub” believe they have cracked it.

All fixed now!


3 posted on 07/19/2007 11:17:28 AM PDT by Holicheese (Zap Razdowler Rules!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Holicheese
Those fiendishly clever Welsh again...
4 posted on 07/19/2007 11:18:56 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

Making Biofuels from Whales?......Greenpeace & PETA will never go for this......


5 posted on 07/19/2007 11:19:09 AM PDT by Red Badger (No wonder Mexico is so filthy. Everybody who does cleaning jobs is HERE!.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

every time the price of gas goes up, gadgets like this appear from thin air. notice how they are lokoing fo rinvestors. if thie really worked, they’d go to a bank, or an investment firm, demonstrate the device, explain how it works, adn they’d be millionaires already.

also notice that the aren’t telling how it works. trust them, send them your dough.

right.


6 posted on 07/19/2007 11:19:25 AM PDT by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

“they can build one small enough to replace a car exhaust that will last for a full tank of petrol.”

So you have to put a new one on af each fill up? Then what do you do with them? Put them in a mine shaft?
Shoot them into the sun?


7 posted on 07/19/2007 11:19:34 AM PDT by Holicheese (Zap Razdowler Rules!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

“Our three minds hold the three keys and we can only unlock it together,” said Houston

That line sounds like a line from the Sting - Sounds like a con job to me... But then again I’m a cynic from way back.


8 posted on 07/19/2007 11:20:35 AM PDT by Waverunner ( "Think for yourselves and let others enjoy the privilege to do so too." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

No disrepect to these inventors, but Anthropogenic Globalwarming is a myth.


9 posted on 07/19/2007 11:21:04 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

As long as they don’t call it Wales Oil they have a chance of attracting venture capital.


10 posted on 07/19/2007 11:25:56 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
OK Larry, I have this great way to save the planet..."
11 posted on 07/19/2007 11:27:47 AM PDT by Holicheese (Zap Razdowler Rules!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Sorry, picture didn’t work


12 posted on 07/19/2007 11:28:27 AM PDT by Holicheese (Zap Razdowler Rules!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

Uh huh. So the CO2 is captured in the box. What happens to the CO? The other residue from the controlled explosion in the engine?
Sounds like a better solution is to invent something that is NOT the internal combustion engine.


13 posted on 07/19/2007 11:35:28 AM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
Let's see, A gallon of gasoline weighs 6.3 lbs, and creates 19.3 lbs of carbon dioxide. The captured carbon dioxide from a full tank of gas will weigh 300lbs or more.

This added weight plus the weight of the recovery system, should really drive down gas mileage creating even more demand for new oil production resulting in destruction of the pristine arctic and added pollution created by mining the Canadian oil sands.

14 posted on 07/19/2007 11:38:08 AM PDT by joshhiggins (O you who believe! do not take the MUSLIMS for friends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

Fishing buddies? Sounds like a fish story to me.

Why do all the renewable energy hype stories sound too good to be true?

CO2 is a gas. The only way to capture it is to fix it in another state. If there is some catalyst or chemical reaction, fine, but what is it? They don’t say.

There is always a catch to these schemes, eg the materials needed in the greenbos cost $1,000,000 per refill, or it weighs 1,000 lbs or the reaction smells like rotten eggs.
After all, if it is a great idea, why not put it on coal-fired power plant smoke stacks?


15 posted on 07/19/2007 11:40:24 AM PDT by WOSG ( Don't tell me what you are against, tell me what you are FOR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

It amazes me the sheer level of conceited arrogance in this particular thread. Nobody here knows if this could possibly work or not, yet everyone has a negative opinion of it.

Thank God folks like Edison didn’t listen to any of your kind. America would still be a backwater agricultural experiment.


16 posted on 07/19/2007 11:43:56 AM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (Famously frisky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: All

It amazes me the sheer level of conceited arrogance in this particular thread. Nobody here knows if this could possibly work or not, yet everyone has a negative opinion of it.

Thank God folks like Edison didn’t listen to any of your kind. America would still be a backwater agricultural experiment.


17 posted on 07/19/2007 11:44:01 AM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (Famously frisky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
It amounts to a very costly, cumbersome, and time consuming way of collecting CO2 to stimulate the growth of algae for use as biofuel.

The algae don’t care where the CO2 comes from. There are already prototypes of systems for using the CO2 from coal fired power plants. Large, stationary systems attached to power plants would be far more economical. Here’s a FR thread about one of these systems: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1773030/posts

18 posted on 07/19/2007 11:47:11 AM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
to trap the greenhouse gases blamed for global warming -- including carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide -- and emit mostly water vapor.

And 95% of the greenhouse gas in the atmosphere consists of

WATER VAPOR.

19 posted on 07/19/2007 11:49:00 AM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

bttt


20 posted on 07/19/2007 11:51:33 AM PDT by southland (Fred will win in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson