Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RaceBannon
Science is based on objective physical evidence. When new evidence comes to light, scientists, using the SM, test their hypothesis and take into account the new discoveries, based on merit.

This contrasts to the creationists, who cherry pick from both the bible and quackery, in the fear that any real evidence would mean that the bible isn't LITERALLY true.

As someone who is open to the existence of a deity, I cannot accept, nor respect the ideas of the creationists, due to their lack of understanding of the scientific method, and use of obfuscation at best, and outright lies at the worst, simply because if science is right, their whole metaphysical worldview will collapse.

Science is always accepting and examining new evidence. Can't really say that about the creationists, can we?

18 posted on 07/20/2007 11:21:52 AM PDT by Clemenza (Rudy Giuliani, like Pesto and Seattle, belongs in the scrap heap of '90s Culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Clemenza

Scientists are constantly looking for a single story that fits all of the evidence. Creationists are looking for all of the evidence that supports a single story.


21 posted on 07/20/2007 11:25:00 AM PDT by SlowBoat407 (It's never a good time to get sucked into an evil vortex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson