Skip to comments.Marine spared prison time in death of Iraqi man (Cpl. Trent Thomas, bad conduct discharge)
Posted on 07/20/2007 10:08:27 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
A military jury on Friday spared a Marine of prison time for kidnapping and conspiring to murder an Iraqi man who was killed as troops hunted in vain for a suspected insurgent.
Cpl. Trent Thomas was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge and reduced pay.
A military jury of three officers and six enlisted Marines deliberated for less than an hour before returning their decision.
Thomas, a 25-year-old father of two, faced a maximum sentence of life in prison without parole. He was convicted Wednesday of kidnapping and conspiracy to murder an Iraqi man after a botched attempt to capture a suspected insurgent in the village of Hamdania in April 2006.
Thomas was acquitted of the most serious charge of premeditated murder, which would have carried a mandatory life sentence, and of lesser offenses including making a false official statement, housebreaking and larceny.
Prosecutors had recommended Thomas be sentenced to 15 years in prison with a dishonorable discharge, reduction in pay and forfeiture.
Bad-conduct discharge, reduced pay
The punishment doesn’t fit the crime. If he’s guilty (and he was convicted) he should have gotten a stiffer sentence. If he wasn’t guilty, he shouldn’t have been convicted.
The fog of war.
A couple thoughts.
Thomas was held in a brig (including an improvised brig that was a toilet-less conex box out in the sun) for more than a year. So he wasn’t spared prison time by the Marine authorities.
Rob Pennington copped a plea and is serving eight years in prison at Miramar. Lesson learned: Playing ball gets you screwed.
His wife testified in mitigation at the sentencing portion of the trial IIRC. Her tears and other testimony got the reduced sentence.
Never having run afoul of the UCMJ I'm a bit confused.If he's being discharged why would his reduction in "pay" (which I assume means a reduction in rank) matter?
If you were on the jury and the prosecution couldn’t even tell you who the victim was and how he died, what would you have done?
Screwed up case, screwed up verdict.
I’m relieved he didn’t receive more jail time, he’s served enough, IMO. I know he pleaded to stay in the Corps and I would have liked to have seen that but the panel really didn’t have much choice.
Thanks for the ping, Red.
Wonder what happens to Congress-critters who double-cross their benefactors.
BTW, I see this guy's penalty being further reduced a couple of years down the road ~ and maybe even the penalty for the other guys who plea bargained.
Would be nice if they identified the victims first in future cases. Nothing more embarrassing than to end up with the wrong body as you enter the sentencing phase.
Not a perfect outcome of a bad trial but I am glad that the hero Marine did not go to jail.
I for one, Thank God that you weren’t on the jury.
How do you feel about Border Patrol agents?
I can think of a few things I’d like to see happen to Murtha but I won’t print them. If he is not forced out of office before the next election I have a hunch this might force him to not run again.
I couldn’t agree more with you on the other items. This whole thing was handled so shabby by the NCIS that no charges should have been brought and the NCIS should be the subject of a full Congressional investigation.
Bump that, jv!
You know, the people I’m really mad at are the ones who hopped up and down when it was revealed that the Pendleton 8 were shackled and treated worse than inmates at Gitmo.
Then it was announced that one of the eight had taken a plea deal. 99% of that support disappeared over night. The likes of Hannity and Michelle Malkin never mentioned the case again.
Well, what did those people expect? What did they think the purpose of shackles and conex boxes were if not to get the weakest link to crack and take a plea so that prosecutors could roll it up from there?
The fickle nature of Pendleton 8 “supporters” was disgusting to witness.
They should have been fired for obstruction of justice, but not prosecuted for shooting the fleeing felon.
Sitting around in air conditioning passing value judgements on ground pounders doing the best they can, jeez.
I don’t listen to his program, so all I know is what I heard from a director of a defense fund.
At the height of the “Marines in shackles” hysteria, Savage helped raise $50,000. Then, when the plea was announced, that fund faucet was just turned completely off. The fund never got another nickel.
I believe Savage still followed the case (sort of). But he didn’t explain to his listeners what was going on. He seemed to accept the fact that one plea deal meant an admission of guilt for all eight.
I’m not beating up on Savage. He did raise fifty grand. But I thought that it was people on the Left who were victims of short attention spans and superficiality. I had thought those of us on the Right had a little more staying power and brain power.
PS to above: Okay, when I say brain and staying power, maybe not Hannity.
Don't know if it will make it to the page, but I just dropped the following at the NC Times web-story:
If you're willing to believe NCIS, then this was a travesty and Cpl. Trent Thomas should have been incarcerated. Apparently the Court's Jury did not believe NCIS, or they would have done more than discharge him out of the Corps. These cases are all under "Undue Command Influence", and while I believe that some charges may be true, the lack of honesty by NCIS, the politicalization by Murtha and his ilk, and the blind acceptance of the lies of the insurgents and their enablers by the Media have precluded any of these trials or hearings to get to the truth.Have you heard anything more about a Congressional [
Our jury system can be a wonderful thing.
That is proven with so little posts on this thread. It might be because it's "early" in the day.
Very sad but very true my FRiend.
Red, sorry about the private post. Pushed the wrong button ...
>> I had thought those of us on the Right had a little more staying power and brain power.
The costs are both financial and psychological both of which can often be managed if the public is willing to help out. Unfortunately, we’re starting out with only half the Country supporting the Military. The numbers dwindle from there.
A lot of this stuff gets back to the heavy financial hand of the prosecutors through a process that clearly needs to be overhauled. There should be some form of limits when the justice involves the Military. They should either cap the prosecutors budgets or provide some sort of matching funds for the defendant.
I have seen nothing further to indicate an investigation of the NCIS or a change of Winters views but I can still hope.
Do you think Sutton was intending to prosecute the Mexican doper?
What you have is sloppy paperwork by people not otherwise required to file paperwork.
Now USPS might fire a window clerk for coming up short a buck and a half (and I've seen that), but counting empty shell casings is not quite in the same category (which I can explain to you if you have half an hour or so).
This is much more like the situation I encountered about 15 years ago when the US attorney prosecuting a mailer had a Postal Inspector call me and ask what the value was of a postal mailing statement (Form 3602).
They had just gotten to the sentencing phase and this guy had been on trial for stealing blank mailing statements.
Since I was the fellow who certified ordering them for nationwide use (and ran the budget for all the forms the mailing public might ever run into) I knew the price. My response was to ask the PI "How many did he take" and the PI said, "well, it's a whole stack ~ maybe a hundred or so".
That'd cost us maybe 37 cents ~ .
The US attorney handling the prosecution about went out of his nut and threatened mayhem. Calls were precipitated to top management, etc., etc.
Sure some mixed wires there.
The guy walked, but not after spending some serious change defending himself from some idiots. I don't know if he ever went after his expenses, but he should have.
BTW, then, as now, USPS policy has been to give them away like water. Never could figure out how this guy ended up getting prosecuted for taking some.
The Sutton case has elements of the USPS 3602 case ~ right down to the crazy prosecutor and the careless investigator.
I think the business about counting the shell casings has to do with justifying government payment for ammunition used in "official business" (to wit, shooting at perps). The penalty would be for the officer to moxie up some bucks to reimburse the government for its lost ammunition ~ and then most likely only when the guy retires, or leaves for some other LE job.
A federale here can probably take us through the daisy chain of accounting for ammunition. Pretty sure "obstruction of justice" would come about if and only if the LEO attempted to change the official record regarding how many rounds he'd been issued out of company stores.
Hmmm. There's probably some guy who still hasn't closed the books on personal accountability for the ammo lost when the Murrah building went up. Wonder if Sutton's counterpart in that district is going to use the deficiencies to prosecute somebody else someday.
Trying to destroy or hide evidence can be taken as evidence of guilt. They shouldn’t have disturbed the scene, they vioulated regulations, and they should have been fired for that.
As I said earlier, they shouldn’t have been prosecuted for shooting the felon.
Let me guess - you’ve never had to formulate and express a logical arguement.
Thomas, a 25-year-old father of two
What kind of future does one have with a dishonorable discharge? How will he support his wife and children?
There were people there who heard the shots. Everything after that is little more than bean-counting.
Well said, Gene. I’ve heard the government spent $43 million to bring Haditha to trial.
Of course, they saved money on Hamdania by breaking the Marines through “unnecessarily strict conditions of confinement”. But, on top of that, the government still must have spent many millions to destroy lance corporals and sergeants.
“Thomas was held in a brig (including an improvised brig that was a toilet-less conex box out in the sun) for more than a year.”
So the P C Police treat another Marine hero like a dog!!
Man, I’m pissed off!!
That's what I said - they violated the regs.
BTW, not every violation of regulations gets you sent to jail ~ just those which apply to paying your postage. You break those rules and you can go to jail for 10 years on each count. They keep an entire wing available for you at Petersburg ~ call it the Postal Wing ~ although it's usually filled to the gunnals with former postal managers.
Being a bit obtuse today, aren't you?
Go back and read my posts - I have said repeatedly that they deserved firing, not a criminal prosecution.
Yes, just returning in kind.
I don't remember anything like that at all from Savage. After hearing the guilty verdict for this case he still believes that these guys were charged with theses crimes for doing their jobs "too well" and still considers them heroes.
As far as Chessani is concerned, he's given $25,000 of his own money and thanks to him an additional $200,000 + has been donated.
Are you sure you mean LtCol Chessani? Which Marines was that sum donated to?
Awesome news for Cpl. Thomas and his family. Unbelievable for the others who took a plea. I am glad this turned out this way. He has paid a big enough price already. I had the feeling this Investigating Officer was quite fair-minded with some of the judgements he had made on various motions. But the jury panel saw it for what it was. The Cpl. shot an alleged insurgent vs. a kindly, old, and crippled grandfather. In one hour. Right call.
You noticed the same thing I did. I was under the impression that if an enlisted was courts-martialed then the accused could elect to have up to 1/3 of the courts-martial panel be enlisted, so long as they were not a junior rank. This trial had 1/3 officers, 2/3 enlisted, leaves me a little confused.
The old rule of thumb was never elect to have any of the panel enlisted. They would be an E-8 or E-9 and tend to opt for a harsher sentance than an officer.
I still remember the rule of thumb you describe which is why I found the composition astounding.
So much has been written by so many people who have conflicting opinions on this entire issue that I opt to accept the outcome of the Judicial action. Moreover, the reviews and appeals that will follow will allow a fair outcome.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.