Skip to comments.Fossil finds shake up dinosaur theories
Posted on 07/22/2007 8:19:41 PM PDT by DaveLoneRanger
click here to read article
[[It was once dogma that eating pork was a serious sin.]]
Correction- it was once a health issue that later became an unfounded dogma by those hwo broke away from worshipping God and valued their own ‘good works’ more than actually listening to God.
Here are just a few contradictions to the Bible (of course, they depend on which of the 50+ versions of it you read, too):
No “true believer” on another long-winded recent thread ever did anything but state that these weren’t contradictions - any of them - but offered no corroborating evidence as to why they weren’t. I expect the same, here. The profound lack of scientific acumen I have seen on this and other websites is truly shocking. The tired old creationist argument that it’s just a “theory” is so pathetic it makes me want to tear my hair out in frustration. Nuclear weapon design theory is just a theory, too. Any creationists willing to sit next to a 10-megatonner while they pop the cork? (well, you wont feel a thing, anyway) After all, it’s only a little “theory”, right, what harm could that possibly do? I guess airplanes can’t really fly because aerodynamics is only a “theory”. The power of the weakest scientific theory is vastly superior to any nonsensical atavistic dogma written by pre-scientific primitives. At least science ADMITS it doesn’t know everything - science is a search for the truth - truth that is backed up by empirical evidence and reproducible results. Religions are static and dogmatic, they make no progress, reveal no new truths, make no new discoveries. They are mired in the ignorance of the past, and are attempts to explain the natural world by a bunch of ignorant savages. Whats really sad is the desperate lengths to which religionists will go to seize upon the discovery of any new evidence that causes a theory to be altered, however much or however slightly, as proof that their primitive, ignorant beliefs are true and the very foundations of modern scientific thought are crumbling under the weight of their heretical, inaccurate beliefs. Ill give you a clue; they arent.
No problem. Biology asserts that all living things are related; therefore it is not surprised that "species" is difficult to pin down.
Baramin Systems asserts that types cannot shade into other types; it is therefore incumbent upon baraminologists to say exactly what a type is and isn't. Of course, when defining types, one must include all types that have lived, not just those currently living.
[[You should pray harder to your toilet if you arent getting the result you desire.]]
No thanks- you can if you wish to play silly little games, but I’ll pray ot the God who takes a personal and very real interest in His creation- mock if oyu like- wouldn’t expect anyhtign different.
And when did it cease to be ahealth issue? Name the date.
By your reasoning, promiscuous sex is not a moral issue provided the health issue can be taken care of.
[[Of course, when defining types, one must include all types that have lived, not just those currently living.]]
Mission nearly accomplished- Sure, there are a few problematic obscure problems- but by golly I’ll be dipped in dog doo if the ‘other’ system don’t have the ery same problems
LOL, that's a good one!
[[By your reasoning, promiscuous sex is not a moral issue provided the health issue can be taken care of.]]
Oh really? I think that? Golly- wasn’t aware that promiscuity ALSO carries OTHER problems like broken marriages, hurt families, phsycological problems, as well as the health issues- thanks fur clearing htat up
Still is for some religions. Interestingly it is in some limited circumstances within Christianity, as explained by Paul in Romans. If it is a matter of conscience for you, don't do it--nor should you do it if it bothers a fellow believer and might undermine his faith.
In many respects Christianity was originally founded on a breaking of past dogmas, and there are many more examples of this. And like Martin Luther leading a rebellion against the stuffy hypocritical dogma of his age, I would assert a real Christ follower should have enough faith not to be afraid of new information and insights.
[[as proof that their primitive, ignorant beliefs are true ]]
I read rtight up until that point and discovered that perhaps you’re incapable of mature arguing- Thanks for making that clear!
Anybody who simply dismisses the mountains of empirical, scientific evidence for evolution with a casual wave of the hand, is either deluded or ignorant of the facts.
Go take a look. Browse around. Check the section on Creationist claims especially. Or will you just dismiss all that too without even going there and reading it because you’ve read the Bible and that’s enough for you?
That’s precisely what they are.
Just tell us what date eating pork ceased to be a health issue, and while you are at it cite your scriptural authority that dietary laws were just a health issue. Be sure to include all of the dietary laws, not just the one for pork.
I would like to see your evidence that sex outside marriage causes psychological problems. Do you suppose it causes more psychological problems than lying to kids about the physical effects of masturbation?
Would you care to speculate on the percentage of freepers who have had sex before marriage. How about their psychological problems?
What, no refutation of any of my cites? How is that “mature arguing”? (I’m so shocked - NOT!)
I find it interesting to see cottshop arguing that morality is just utilitarian. That’s an interesting insight. I wonder how many other believers accept that argument?
How about simply siting a few of the most compelling alleged contradictions?
Not true. Interspecific hybrids can be viable and such hybridization is thought to have produced new species.
No problem!! Good idea!!
The sins of the father:
ISA 14:21 Prepare slaughter for his children for the iniquity of their fathers; that they do not rise, nor possess the land, nor fill the face of the world with cities.
DEU 24:16 The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers: every man shall be put to death for his own sin.
How, pray tell, is this not a contradiction?
I’ll put up a truck farm side-of-the-road stand for your humdingers right over by Leaf Springs, and throw in real pico de gallo bits.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.