Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DaveLoneRanger
Give it up.

There is nothing in this science article that supports creationism.

5 posted on 07/22/2007 8:40:24 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman; DaveLoneRanger
"Give it up.
There is nothing in this science article that supports creationism."

Shows how little understanding you have of the issue. - The facts of the article fully support what one would expect in a specially created world, and the opposite of what the dumwinists wish to portray.

10 posted on 07/22/2007 8:52:43 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Coyoteman

“There is nothing in this science article that supports creationism.”

Maybe, but do it change facts? Is there nothing left to learn?


20 posted on 07/22/2007 9:23:06 PM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Coyoteman
There is nothing in this science article that supports creationism.

The usage of the word creationism has a specific meaning and given that I won't disagree, however, what has been found does not disagree with what the Bible the WHOLE book instructs.

I do have a question, did all these species die at the same time either under the old theory or under the new evolving theory?

163 posted on 07/24/2007 12:40:19 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson