Skip to comments.
YouTuber Manages To Flash Obscene Image On The Screen During Democrat Debate (graphic language alert
KXMC ^
| 7-24-2007
| KXMC
Posted on 07/24/2007 11:17:02 AM PDT by jmc813
Welcome to the internet, mainstream media!
(NNC) - When CNN and YouTube decided to pair up and merge the mediums of television and internet, neither companies quite expected to get all the baggage that comes with user-submitted, online-oriented content. This time, that baggage came in the form of a hidden online secret image, lovingly labeled GOATSE, based on the original website *Link removed By poster, Search it out if you're that much of a freak*.
GOATSE refers to an image that began circulating the internet and infiltrating innocent users internet explorer windows as early as January 2000. But what makes this image so unique is its inherently offensive nature - portraying a man distending his anal lining with his two hands while providing a very clear image of his erect penis
And despite an extensive screening and thorough analyzation of the videos submitted on behalf of YouTube and CNN alike, the image still made it under the radar and into tonights debate
The incident in question came during a question about our nations healthcare system. The user who submitted the video was speaking innocuously into the camera when the image of goatse was flashed for the briefest moment in 1/24th of a second, ranging just above the framerate treshhold with which television broadcasts.
TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democratscandals; goatse; photoops; youtubedebate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-74 next last
1
posted on
07/24/2007 11:17:04 AM PDT
by
jmc813
To: jmc813
The consequences of allowing YouTube into the debate. But hey, what’s one more anal orifice on stage?
*Sits back and waits for the rest of the jokes to pour in*
2
posted on
07/24/2007 11:19:09 AM PDT
by
DaveLoneRanger
(As He died to make men holy, let us die to make men free.)
To: jmc813
A room full of filthy demon666rats is a bigger obscenity than anything that flashable on Utube.
3
posted on
07/24/2007 11:19:51 AM PDT
by
Weeedley
To: jmc813
It could not have been worse than what the candidates were sayiing.
To: jmc813
Who hasn’t already seen teh GOATSECKS?
5
posted on
07/24/2007 11:22:02 AM PDT
by
counterpunch
("The Democrats are the party of slavery." - Cindy Sheehan)
To: DaveLoneRanger
Did Edwards blush, or become excited?
Just wondering....
6
posted on
07/24/2007 11:22:10 AM PDT
by
Badeye
(You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
Comment #7 Removed by Moderator
To: Always Right
I made the mistake of Googling that image.
I'm sorry I did. God forgive me.
8
posted on
07/24/2007 11:22:52 AM PDT
by
reagan_fanatic
(This space left intentionally blank)
To: jmc813
And despite an extensive screening and thorough analyzation of the videos submitted on behalf of YouTube and CNN alike, the image still made it under the radar and into tonights debate
And yet you still label the analyzation thorough!
9
posted on
07/24/2007 11:23:20 AM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: jmc813
There for a minute I thought this was just a salute to the obvious. I mean Hillary was on the screen...
10
posted on
07/24/2007 11:23:31 AM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(Hillary has already beat Rudy, She is the better cross-dresser.)
To: jmc813
Helen Thomas in a swimsuit?.......
11
posted on
07/24/2007 11:24:05 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(No wonder Mexico is so filthy. Everybody who does cleaning jobs is HERE!.......)
To: All
Ok so now ONE of the videos was a fake produced by Salon writers in L.A.
and NOW
another was a joke in order to flash a sexual obsenity.
I hope the republicans don’t do this Youtube nonsense.
12
posted on
07/24/2007 11:26:26 AM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: Red Badger
Helen Thomas in a swimsuit?.......
Topless Gore.
13
posted on
07/24/2007 11:27:26 AM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: jmc813
“But what makes this image so unique is its inherently offensive nature - portraying a man distending his anal lining with his two hands while providing a very clear image of his erect penis”
I guess the author of this piece couldn’t just leave it as “an offensive image,” or even “an image of a nude man engaged in lewd conduct.” Thanks for the detail.
14
posted on
07/24/2007 11:27:54 AM PDT
by
LanPB01
To: jmc813
I just made the big mistake of typing GOATSE in image search.
I need to buy an island.
15
posted on
07/24/2007 11:28:45 AM PDT
by
mowowie
To: LanPB01
16
posted on
07/24/2007 11:30:38 AM PDT
by
mowowie
To: longtermmemmory
Which question was the fake from salon.com?
17
posted on
07/24/2007 11:31:13 AM PDT
by
Robert A. Cook, PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: LanPB01
For some reason it’s cracking me up though.
18
posted on
07/24/2007 11:31:49 AM PDT
by
mowowie
To: jmc813
Hey, you’re calling “portraying a man distending his anal lining with his two hands while providing a very clear image of his erect penis” an offensive sight?
Isn’t this the image supposedly millions of gay men find appealing, if not downright irresistable? It’s not like you can’t see this kind of behavior going on at any New Orleans “Southern Decadence” celebration.
What’s wrong with a little public sex education? The guy was out (literally) and most likely, proud.
Oh yeah, /sarc
To: jmc813
YouTuber Manages To Flash Obscene Image On The Screen During Democrat Debate
Yeah I saw it! It was wearing a bright orange pantsuit...
20
posted on
07/24/2007 11:32:45 AM PDT
by
COBOL2Java
(The Democrat Party: radical Islam's last hope)
To: jmc813
To remove that image would have been deemed a “hate crime” for not waving the pervert rainbow flag enthusiastically enough.
21
posted on
07/24/2007 11:33:12 AM PDT
by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: counterpunch
22
posted on
07/24/2007 11:35:22 AM PDT
by
stylin19a
(Don't buy a putter until you have had a chance to throw it.)
To: dead; Admin Moderator
23
posted on
07/24/2007 11:35:58 AM PDT
by
weegee
(NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
24
posted on
07/24/2007 11:37:32 AM PDT
by
weegee
(NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
To: jmc813
Looks painful,now my curiosity about what the inside of anus looks like is quenched. I will wonder no more.
25
posted on
07/24/2007 11:38:23 AM PDT
by
linn37
(Phlebotomists need love too.)
To: dead
26
posted on
07/24/2007 11:38:33 AM PDT
by
Lockbar
(March toward the sound of the guns.)
To: mowowie
It is kind of funny to read someone attempt to describe the image in serious terms.
27
posted on
07/24/2007 11:39:19 AM PDT
by
LanPB01
To: weegee
Your removed image is also currently one of the Top 3 Most E-mailed and Most Recommended images in AP library. So is mine (minus the addition of the Al Gore head.)
There is no understanding the mind of the moderators though. We are but mortals.
28
posted on
07/24/2007 11:40:02 AM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: dead
If Yahoo screencaps the Youtube/CNN clip, the image I cited could drop to number 4.
29
posted on
07/24/2007 11:42:10 AM PDT
by
weegee
(NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
To: jmc813
There's a horrible lower-than-B-movie that starred the 6 million dollar man called
Agency. The subject is inserting manipulatives just below the conscious level during political messages.
Scares me.
30
posted on
07/24/2007 11:43:34 AM PDT
by
bannie
(The Good Guys cannot win when they're the only ones to play by the rules.)
To: jmc813
Oh aaaaaagh!
I had forgotten about that image...
Guess lunch is out of the question now.
31
posted on
07/24/2007 11:44:36 AM PDT
by
PAMadMax
(Islam is a disease....)
To: stylin19a
So I guess you’re new to the internet then.
Welcome!
32
posted on
07/24/2007 11:47:05 AM PDT
by
counterpunch
("The Democrats are the party of slavery." - Cindy Sheehan)
To: jmc813
PWNED!
33
posted on
07/24/2007 11:50:25 AM PDT
by
Ignatz
(Soylent Green are people, too!)
To: Ignatz
34
posted on
07/24/2007 11:54:56 AM PDT
by
counterpunch
("The Democrats are the party of slavery." - Cindy Sheehan)
To: jmc813
And despite an extensive screening and thorough analyzation of the videos submitted ...
***
Analyzation??? Doesn’t the “journalist” mean “analysis”?
Sheesh.
35
posted on
07/24/2007 11:58:28 AM PDT
by
NCLaw441
To: reagan_fanatic
Ut oh. Here read this....
36
posted on
07/24/2007 11:59:52 AM PDT
by
CJ Wolf
To: reagan_fanatic
Me too. That was so horrible and I wish my curiosity would just stay curious. God forgive me
To: CJ Wolf
38
posted on
07/24/2007 12:06:12 PM PDT
by
counterpunch
("The Democrats are the party of slavery." - Cindy Sheehan)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
apparently some Salon writers portrayed themselves from Kentucky or Tennessee, (iow a red state area) to ask a soft ball left wing question.
39
posted on
07/24/2007 12:06:55 PM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: jmc813
Right, like it was accidental and the screeners didn’t know.
40
posted on
07/24/2007 12:07:15 PM PDT
by
DBrow
To: counterpunch
Because my LOLcat was pwned : (
41
posted on
07/24/2007 12:08:47 PM PDT
by
counterpunch
("The Democrats are the party of slavery." - Cindy Sheehan)
To: jmc813
“Our next question comes from a Mr. Tyler Durden”
To: RikaStrom
43
posted on
07/24/2007 12:13:15 PM PDT
by
RikaStrom
(The number one rule of the Kama Sutra is that you both be on the same page.../Exeter 051705)
To: longtermmemmory
44
posted on
07/24/2007 12:16:03 PM PDT
by
counterpunch
("The Democrats are the party of slavery." - Cindy Sheehan)
To: CJ Wolf
45
posted on
07/24/2007 12:16:49 PM PDT
by
mowowie
To: mowowie
This is the headline from CBS:-
YouTuber Manages To Flash Obscene Image On The Screen During Demcorat Debate
Notice any spelling errors?
46
posted on
07/24/2007 12:21:16 PM PDT
by
Never2baCrat
(I used to be modest, now I'm perfect!)
To: Never2baCrat
47
posted on
07/24/2007 12:25:59 PM PDT
by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated)
To: Never2baCrat

CBS proof reader
48
posted on
07/24/2007 12:34:05 PM PDT
by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated)
To: Badeye
Did Edwards blush, or become excited? They say his eyelashes fluttered uncontrollably...
49
posted on
07/24/2007 12:35:36 PM PDT
by
johnny7
("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
Comment #50 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson