Posted on 07/25/2007 8:30:15 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
No, it certainly can’t! If only we had such statesmen alive today to stir the masses!
That seems to happen periodically....I end up seeing it AFTER I “double post.” Oh well.....some things are just better twice. : )
My...and it looks like “our” pleasure!
Note how not one person has answered my hypothetical in #20. I even asked for a better alternative to the system in place (which worked, in case you didn't notice). One, in fact, ran away from it in terror.
Yet no one dares to answer. Why? Because it would expose them to be frauds.
I answered your question -
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1871707/posts?page=25#25
You have not answered any of mine. Nor have you responded to my post here -
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1871707/posts?page=50#50
Will you answer my questions?
Or are you supposed to be one of those who are “more equal than others?”
When give an answer, and he doesn’t like the answer, does saying you didn’t answer make it true?
indeed!
You’re going to smuggle a weapon into Belarus, or buy one on the black market there. Quit the BS.
I could always wave your magic wand, and call the answer “irrelevant,” what do you think? Even easier?
over two U.S. citizens. That's the point, not what the subject matter of litigation concerned.
By what authority does the U.N. have subject matter jurisdiction over any U.S. citizen, entity, enterprise, or company?
“Subject matter jurisdiction” is a legal term of art. In this case, “subject matter jurisdiction” is held (probably) by the Federal District Court in the district where Twentieth Century Fox has its corporate headquarters. A ruling by an arbitration panel does not change that. One would think a conservative would know.
Wrong.
Subject matter jurisdiction must first be decided in any U.S. court of law. Otherwise, the Judge has no control over, no jurisdiction over, any party, regardless of their claims, regardless of the subject matter.
This is and was a matter for the U.S. Courts, not the U.N.
We citizens are not “subject” to a United Nations entity, of any form. Anything agreed to by any individual or group of people which goes against the Constitution is, by definition, un-Constitutional. This country cannot legally waive U.S. Constitutional authority over its citizens, its enterprises, its intellectual property, its anything, over to the U.N.
You never stated a location. I assumed by your lack of info that it would be somewhere local. Then again since I don’t surf kiddy porn I would never know the pictures existed unless my child’s info was released with these hypothetical pictures and I was informed of it.
So if a group of UN thugs raped your child what would you do? The pickles incident really happened, MANY TIMES!
Do you need links to websites that describe your beloved UN’s actions, victimizing helpless children they’re supposed to protect?
Since you’re so fond of assuming facts not in evidence, assume the contrary. Pretend you’re taking a law school exam . . . that’s what this thread is about, isn’t it?
No kidding. I've worked in a lawfirm for years. I know exactly what that is.
A U.N. entity issued a ruling, that means, it claims to have authority over a U.S. citizen and a U.S. company.
By what authority does the U.N. have subject matter jurisdiction over U.S. citizens?
And I'll bet a nickel that the law firm where you work does not do IP/copyright.
Hint: Reposting the question, that you refuse to answer, does not make the reposting of same “arguing in circles.”
The U.N. does not own or control the internet or copyrights.
Therefore, it does not have automatic authority over U.S. citizens who use same.
No offense, but what the hell are you talking about? Yes, I made an assumption because YOU FAILED to give the location as Belarus. Are you able to go to your professor during a law school exam and ask for more info? I really doubt it.
I answered your questions but you completely avoided mine. What are you afraid of?
About assumptions, in reality you must take actions based on the information present and live with the consequences of your actions. Often that means you must make certain assumptions. Reality is not a college campus where you get spoon fed a blame the U.S. agenda 24/7.
Incidentally; you must live a very sheltered life. You can buy anything anywhere if you find the right connections and you are willing to pay the price.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.