Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia stakes its claim on North Pole in underwater search for oil(gazprom's new frontier?)
Times Online ^ | 07/28/07 | Tony Halpin

Posted on 07/28/2007 8:22:50 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

July 28, 2007

Russia stakes its claim on North Pole in underwater search for oil

Tony Halpin in Moscow

Russia is making an audacious grab for the vast energy riches of the Arctic with an underwater mission to plant its flag beneath the North Pole.

A team of explorers plans to descend 4,300 metres (1,400ft) to the seabed in a miniature submarine tomorrow to stake Russia’s claim to an area of ocean the size of Western Europe. The polar expedition aims to prove that the Lomonosov Ridge, an underwater shelf that runs through the Arctic, is an extension of Russian territory.

The Kremlin has poured £40 million into the voyage, which is receiving blanket coverage on state television, to try to secure billions of tonnes of untapped oil and gas reserves under the ocean. Two members of the Duma, the Russian parliament, will plant the one-metre flag, made of titanium, during what will be the first manned journey to the seabed of the North Pole.

“This will be a truly historic dive,” Anatoli Sagalevich, chief of the Oceanology Institute at the Russian Academy of Sciences, told Itar-Tass. “The human eye has never seen the North Pole from a depth of 4,300 metres.”

Before the expedition left the northern port of Murmansk, Artur Chilingarov, 68, the expedition leader, said: “The Arctic is ours and we should demonstrate our presence.”

Mr Chilingarov is a deputy speaker in the Duma and president of the Association of Polar Explorers of the Russian Federation. His fellow submariner, Vladimir Gruzdev, said that the expedition would “remind the whole world that Russia is a great polar and scientific power”.

More than 100 scientists are on board the Akademik Fyodorov, Russia’s flagship research vessel, for what is the largest expedition yet organised to the Pole. A nuclear-powered ice-breaker, the Rossiya, is accompanying the ship.

Two deep-water submersibles will make three dives to the sea bed to try to confirm research by a Russian expedition in May suggesting that the Lomonosov Ridge is an extension of the Siberian continental shelf.

No country has jurisdiction over the Arctic, which is governed by the International Seabed Authority, but Russia has long sought to extend its territorial boundary. It lodged a demand for 1.2 million sq km (463,000 sq miles) of ocean in 2001 with the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, which asked for more scientific data to support Russia’s case.

The expeditions are collecting data to back a fresh submission in 2009, the centenary of the first journey to the North Pole. At stake are vast reserves of oil and gas that are considered increasingly viable economically as climate change makes the Arctic less hostile to exploitation. Russian geologists argue that the area contains 10 billion tonnes of oil and gas, though some estimates put the total closer to 100 billion tonnes.

Russia’s claim to the North Pole is opposed by the four other Arctic countries — Canada, the United States, Norway and Denmark, through its sovereignty over Greenland. Under international law, each nation is entitled to control an economic zone within 200 miles of its continental shelf, but the limits of the shelf are disputed.

Denmark and Canada argue that the Lomonosov Ridge is connected to their territories and dispatched a joint expedition last year to bolster their claims. Stephen Harper, the Canadian Prime Minister, ordered a new fleet of patrol vessels last month, saying that they were needed to defend “our sovereignty over the Arctic”.

Russia’s determination to claim the territory poses particular problems for the US, which has refused to ratify the Law of the Sea Treaty governing disputes over exploitation rights, restricting its influence on the Arctic’s future.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: artic; energy; environment; geopolitics; lost; oil; russia; tlr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 07/28/2007 8:22:54 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Putin must feel that he is on a roll.:-)
2 posted on 07/28/2007 8:23:27 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Could Santa Claus be forced to work for Putin?
3 posted on 07/28/2007 8:24:47 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Russia is making an audacious grab for the vast energy riches of the Arctic

This is not news. It is another news report. Several threads have scrolled by already and this news item should be appended to the original thread.

4 posted on 07/28/2007 8:26:16 AM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I hope they are successful in making this claim. They won’t listen to these environmental faggots (In the John Edwards sense) like US policy makers do. The result will be an increase in oil supply.


5 posted on 07/28/2007 8:29:12 AM PDT by frithguild (The Freepers moved as a group, like a school of sharks sweeping toward an unaware and unarmed victim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

This is old news but I’m going to repeat what I said on the previous threads:

I’d rather the Russians get their hands on those resources than our own whacko environmentalists or the whackos in the UN. At least the Russians will sell them on the open market. At the highest price they can get, sure. But at least those resources will be available to us.

If the UN or the US took possession of them, we’d find a new endangered species or unhappy caribou or drowning polar bear cub once every 30 seconds or so.


6 posted on 07/28/2007 8:30:33 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

The US obviously isn’t going after any oil anywhere so somebody else might as well have it. Tough noogies for us...


7 posted on 07/28/2007 8:50:47 AM PDT by toomuchcoffee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
I’d rather the Russians get their hands on those resources than our own whacko environmentalists or the whackos in the UN.

Point taken and agreed to.

However, I think Russia's claim to exclusive exploitation rights in international waters is a display of arrogance and a bad precedent if allowed to stand. The Russians could just exploit without an exclusive claim I would think...

8 posted on 07/28/2007 8:55:17 AM PDT by SteamShovel (Global Warming, the New Patriotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: toomuchcoffee

The US needs to start training more artic warriors now. This will eventually lead to conflict with the US and Russia.


9 posted on 07/28/2007 8:55:29 AM PDT by Americanexpat (A strong democracy through citizen oversight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: toomuchcoffee
Tough noogies for us...

Are you a DNC worker promoting their agenda? ; )

10 posted on 07/28/2007 8:55:46 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SteamShovel

You’re right technically, and legally, but I’m not so sure it’s a bad precedent.

With the UN trying to lay claim to the entire global seabed, it might be a GOOD precedent for individual states to just say no.

Don’t get me wrong. I trust the Russians to be consistently self-interested and actively anti-American.

But still, not as bad as the UN.


11 posted on 07/28/2007 9:04:25 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Maybe Frank was right..

“The Dragon in the Sea” 1956 (also as “Under Pressure”)(also as “21st Century Sub”)

Story - a nuke sub stealing oil from an arctic pipeline. Old school Cold War novel with a strange resonance today.

Frank Herbert famous for Dune and the spin offs, a Navy man, he knew the sea. My favorite book of his is “Tactics of Mistake” and the book was on the reading list at one time for USAF NCOs.

12 posted on 07/28/2007 9:13:21 AM PDT by ASOC (Yeah, well, maybe - but can you *prove* it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Maybe Russia should also declare the sale of Alaska to the US null and void so it can drill in ANWAR, too. We could then move toward energy independence, as long as we stay friendly with Putin.
13 posted on 07/28/2007 9:25:25 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Planting trees to offset carbon emissions is like drinking water to offset rising ocean levels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Could Santa Claus be forced to work for Putin?

I think Santa already works for the Chi-Coms.... ever notice where all the toys are made these days!?

14 posted on 07/28/2007 9:30:38 AM PDT by operation clinton cleanup (When Hill met Bill: If you're going to keep staring at me, I might as well introduce myself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
A team of explorers plans to descend 4,300 metres (1,400ft) to the seabed in a miniature submarine

The times has it wrong. 4,300 meters is 14,107.6 feet.

15 posted on 07/28/2007 9:38:33 AM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Map of Lomonosov Ridge

16 posted on 07/28/2007 9:38:52 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rudder
The times has it wrong. 4,300 meters is 14,107.6 feet.

Have those "Drive-By" L.S.M.-clowns ever been right on anything???

17 posted on 07/28/2007 10:10:08 AM PDT by danamco (Now, I would LOVE to hear your solution as to how to remove 12 to 30 million people from this countr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Rudder

what would be fun is getting into a DSV of our own and going down there to move their flag somewhere else...closer to Russia perhaps...

by the way, I call dibs on the moon with the US flag on it!


18 posted on 07/28/2007 10:30:59 AM PDT by stefanbatory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Subhead: Enviros silent on Russian plans to develop any field they find. Elsewhere, enviros protest attempts to drill in ANWAR.


19 posted on 07/28/2007 11:24:13 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
It will be interesting to see if the environment wackos protest the Russian move....
20 posted on 07/28/2007 11:29:31 AM PDT by thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson