Skip to comments.PETER PAUL AND HILLARY: As court date nears, this timeline will make it understandable to the MSM
Posted on 07/29/2007 1:04:20 PM PDT by doug from uplandEdited on 07/30/2007 7:59:44 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
click here to read article
Watch you back and know you are my prayers
don't become a member of this list
Old music by Gravity Kills called “Enough” comes to mind.
With the amount of power she has, she can do anything she wants to me no matter how I watch my back. The Clintons have proven that. You know what, we have soldiers facing the Islamofascists every day as they risk their lives to defend our freedom. What little I do is miniscule in comparison. If they can face the Islamofascists, I am not going to let Hillary scare me. You either, Sid.
Very Good, but I bet she’s got other people on her payroll.
to date....not one word in thelib/dem msm...when will
nbc - williams/c-bs- couric/abc - charlie tuna gibson report this crime???
or NIN “Terrible Lies”
This time, however, she will be confronted with 5 hours of home video and things she could not possibly fail to recall.
Either way, it's incompetence to not have recall of so much interaction and it's incompetent to pathologically lie about not recalling any of the many meetings and dialogs she had with Paul.
Apparently those don't disqualify a person from being a Senator. ..Leastwise until a large number of advertising dollars pay to get the story out to the general public. And if no media outlet will accept the advertisements then direct mail would be the likely option.
Frankly, I think talk radio is going to do it "for" Hillary. Perhaps Hillary could go on several talk-radio programs to ensure that she gets equal time on this issue.
Great analogy, DFU!
I spent quite a while last night reading the 2004 complaint and it was very interesting reading. Sure, I knew what despicable crooks they are, but reading this complaint was incredibly shocking. Hillary called boldfaced lying a “media strategy”.
If you haven’t read it yet and want to check it out it’s here.
You can stoop her; I hope to stop her. :)
“This time, however, she will be confronted with 5 hours of home video and things she could not possibly fail to recall.”
I admit, I am probably the freeper least familiar with this story doug. I have a lot of catching up to do. But I have a question. It sounds like a lot is dependent on the home video being admissable. How certain are you that it will be?
Bump for truth and the new media!
In his response to the latest appellate brief, David Kendall mentioned the problem of taping without approval. The problem for Kendall and Hillary is that she was aware it was on speaker phone. There was no expectation of privacy. All of the other home video is certainly admissable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.