Lanny Davis was whining and lying saying that we Freepers said unspeakable things about Hillary. He's full of crap.
That's what Lyin' Lanny does. Along with a cadre of Clinton butt-boys which included that weasel Rahm Emanuel, they spent all their time carrying water and lying for the Clintons. With the record they all have, they're in no position to criticize Free Republic or most anyone else.
ROFLOL!! Hey, Lanny. Pull your head out. Hillary IS an unspeakable thing.
But, did he deny that the things said here were truthful, or just that we didn't have "proof".
Bill should have told Lanny that the truth about Hillary is "unspeakable" only among libs.
Anything I’ve said about Hillary is quite ‘speakable’ — as in she’s a vicious, mendacious, felonious charlatan. What I want to know is how can liberal pimps like Lanny Davis go on the way they do. Surely he knows the truth about Hillary, and merely regards her as useful to the ‘movement’....
>Lanny Davis was whining and lying saying that we freepers said unspeakable things about Hillary....<
Well, I did call her a commie henchwoman today. But that was no lie. :)
Oh c'mon Lanny. This coming from a political whore who has been in the game for years. What did we say about Hilary that was so "unspeakable"? Was it 'cankles'? Or perhaps 'Hitlery', or remarks about her fat butt? Oh the humanity. Lanny the princess is much too sensitive.
I agree that all those things are unspeakable. If Lanny Davis doesn't want us putting the horrible truths about Hillary Clinton out there for all to see, I can't say that I blame him. She is, after all, an uspeakable human being.
Well, we do say some pretty awful things about her. But most of them are justified factually--she has an extraordinarily sordid record in public life. IMHO, she's an awful person and would be a terrifying president--I don't think it's unfair to say that she lusts for power and has deeply extreme and utopian views that she intends to shove down our throats if elected. Think of the American middle class as Kulaks. Or as insufficiently ideologically pure factory managers in the reign of Madame Mao.
Were she elected, the only thing preventing her from becoming another Madame Mao would, imho, be whatever checks and balances built into our system survive after a democrat congress abdicates its role in limiting her lust for power.
Maybe I'm wrong and maybe she's a moderate dem who respects opinions and viewpoints other than her own and maybe she will not govern by executive fiat like her husband did. Maybe she will not seek to remake American society in a bizarre leftist orgy of executive orders. Maybe she will not deliberately devastate American military power the way she and her husband did in the 90's. But I think the evidence points the other way.
I regard her as dangerous--the most dangerous politician in American in since Huey Long. And it isn't hateful to say that. It is an expression of love for my country. I guess what I'm saying is that if Huey Long were running for president, it wouldn't be hateful to point out that he was a dangerous, thuggish demagogue who used violence, fraud and transparent class-warfare to become the dictator of Louisiana. He was the perfect blend of organized crime and politics. Well, Huey Long is alive and well in 2008 and his name is Hillary. She wants to do for us what Huey did for Louisiana.
There is, of course, some hyperbole ("rhymes with stitch" type stuff) and posting of obviously doctored pictures (HRC with a broomstick) to make a point. But most of it is within the range of what I think is acceptable political satire. Some is in bad taste; but it's a public forum and anyone can post here. You cannot judge the entire forum by the bad taste of a few.