Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Leading Pro-Abortion Democrat: Slow Down on Supreme Court Judges
LifeNews.com ^ | July 28, 2007 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 07/31/2007 3:17:01 AM PDT by monomaniac

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- One of the top pro-abortion Democrats in the Senate says he wants Congress to slow down on confirming the next Supreme Court nominee if President Bush has a chance to pick one more before the end of his term.

Sen. Charles Schumer, of New York, commented on the same day a poll showed a majority of Americans backed the high court's decision in the partial-birth abortion case.

Schumer said on Friday at the American Constitution Society convention that the Senate should only confirm Bush's next high court nominee "in extraordinary circumstances" and should "reverse the presumption of confirmation."

"The Supreme Court is dangerously out of balance," he said. "We cannot afford to see Justice (John Paul) Stevens replaced by another (Chief Justice John) Roberts, or Justice (Ruth Bader) Ginsburg by another (Justice Samuel) Alito."

Schumer, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee and the chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, said he and other abortion advocates have second thoughts about confirming Roberts and Alito.

“Alito shouldn't have been confirmed,” Schumer said. “I should have done a better job. My colleagues said we didn't have the votes, but I think we should have twisted more arms and done more.”

"Were we too easily impressed by the charm of nominee Roberts and the erudition of nominee Alito?" he asked rhetorically. "Did we mistakenly vote our hopes when our fears were more than justified by the ultraconservative records of these two men? Yes."

He said he felt "duped" during confirmation hearings for the two most recent additions to the US Supreme Court given their decision in the partial-birth abortion and other cases.

Schumer said senators too easily accepted the nominee's word, during their confirmation hearings, that they would respect legal precedents.

"There is no doubt that we were hoodwinked," he concluded.

White House spokeswoman Dana Perino responded to the comments and said Schumer's remarks "showed a tremendous disrespect for the Constitution."

"This is the kind of blind obstruction that people have come to expect from Sen. Schumer," Perino told the Politico web site.

"He has an alarming habit of attacking people whose character and position make them unwilling or unable to respond," she added. "That is the sign of a bully. If the past is any indication, I would bet that we would see a Democratic senatorial fundraising appeal in the next few days."

Members of the Supreme Court such as pro-abortion Justices John Paul Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg are both facing advancing age and significant health issues. However, it doesn't appear President Bush will see any retirements from the high court during the rest of his term.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: 110th; abortion; alito; bush; congress; democrats; gingsburg; ginsburg; partialbirthabortion; pba; prolife; roberts; schumer; scotus

1 posted on 07/31/2007 3:17:04 AM PDT by monomaniac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: monomaniac

Schumer really is a creep and a thug.


2 posted on 07/31/2007 3:37:33 AM PDT by Salvey (ancest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac

GOD made notes on schumer’s statement. Methinks he will come to hate his words...

LLS


3 posted on 07/31/2007 4:29:23 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

I must admit, when I first heard the news about Chief Justice Roberts’ injury yesterday, my first thought was “where was Chuck Schumer?”

If Ginsburg, Stevens, Breyer, Souter retire (one way or another) before President Bush leaves office, I say just leave the slot open. Make sure that the Left doesn’t go “Pelican Brief” on Roberts, Thomas, Scalia, Alito, and Kennedy, and when the caterwauling starts on the Left about the need to fill the slots, someone better hit back hard with, “well, the senator from New York said ‘no more judges’, so the White House is complying.”

And then, when a judge is nominated, at the confirmation hearing, to counter the stupid “Let us Vote” sign that the Left had at the all night senate session, we have a picture of a baby in the womb, with these words next to the child: “Let us live”. And then, in the course of the testimony, the Republicans (minus Specter of course) should lay out every case of Democrat duplicity and obstruction in the judicial process. I know they won’t, but I can wish, can’t I?


4 posted on 07/31/2007 6:29:58 AM PDT by Christian4Bush ("Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech." Hold a hearing on that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac
"He said he felt "duped" "

Schumer is a jack-ass. How is it that liberals are always "duped" into something. They have no leadership ability or accountability at all. For the record Alito and Roberts are the some of the best things that happened to the Supreme Court. Ruth Buzzy Ginsberg was one of the worst.

5 posted on 07/31/2007 6:50:47 AM PDT by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Christian4Bush

I like your style!

LLS


6 posted on 07/31/2007 7:26:05 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson