Local woman taking big steps for Ron Paul

Seacoast Online ^ | August 01, 2007 | By Michael Mccord

[zencat]

Only nutjobs, Paulnuts, the lunatic left, Du dummies, Kos kiddies, Sorosites support this moronic, surrender monkey that wants to run away from Al Qaeda in Iraq, the same al Qaeda that attacked us on 9/11.

I'm none of the above. Ain't on no Paul pinglist. Don't want to be. Ain't voting for him, and strongly disagree with him on intervention.

Just that he's the only one talking about truly 'limited government', and has some credentials to back it up.

[MEGoody]

Denial is not a river in Egypt, it seems.

It is certainly a place visited on a regular basis by Ron Paul supporters. ;)

Well, come the Ames straw poll and the '08 primaries, at least one of us will be surprised, eh?

Unless you are expecting Ron Paul to lose, yes, you will be.

[SnakeDoctor]

Every morning from today until the 2008 Elections ... I will be having ...

[Drumroll}

Breakfast (usually a cinnamon pop tart) for Fred Thompson

[Applause]

Followed later by ... please hold your applause until the end ... driving my hydrocarbon-powered Hummer 30 miles to work for Fred Thompson; working for Fred Thompson; having lunch for Fred Thompson; working a little more for Fred Thompson; driving my hydrocarbon-power Hummer 30-miles home for Fred Thompson; having dinner for Fred Thompson; watching TV for Fred Thompson; doing fantastic things with my wife, although unspeakable in polite company, for Fred Thompson; watching Seinfeld for Fred Thompson; and sleeping for Fred Thompson.

My idea is no less stupid, and probably more productive ... where is my media coverage? This woman need a job.

H

[George W. Bush]

Sorry, Georgia, we have to keep it clean, even if provoked.

[George W. Bush]

Lol. Worried about the purge?

Not at all. It's hardly our fault if the media is writing so many articles, including National Review and other columnists. However, a couple of stories a day about any candidate is probably enough.

FreeRepublic doesn't have an official candidate and the GOP doesn't have a nominee. Why don't you guys post some positive articles on your candidates? Or don't you have any other than them cowering in fear over actually having to answer questions from YouTube?

[jrooney]

Me thinks you are worried about the purge.

"FreeRepublic doesn't have an official candidate and the GOP doesn't have a nominee"

Save you the time, neither will be Paul.

"Why don't you guys post some positive articles on your candidates?"

Because I do not feel the need to push a candidate on this forum. I will vote for anyone of them that wins the GOP nomination, except Paul.

Taking questions from youtube, boy that is real statesman like. Leave that to the democrats. What next you want the GOP candidate to take questions from the MTV crowd or maybe trekkies?

[rineaux]

Was reading the post but just seems to be the same cut and paste posters who bash Ron Paul which makes me lean more toward him than I have any other candidate.

No one in the top tier candidates makes any sense. RP is the only one with the intestinal fortitude to speak his mind.

Voted for Reagan, worked on both GH, and GW campaigns. Having wrote this, it is the basis of a campaign to muster up and motivate the voters to vote. Any of the campaign camps will take the kooks, moonbats and any other silly name given to them vote.

Paul is getting some odd balls which is fine, but also ordinary people who are starting to see beyond the smoke screen that has been placed in front of them for so long.

Again, I have to thank the cut and paste Anti-Paul crowd with their continued bashing of RP, they make a great case to support him.

Once the Delegates select the Candidate at the RNC, lets hope we can put our bashing aside and support that Candidate. Otherwise we stay home and possibly expect a win from the Hilliary Obama ticket.

[DreamsofPolycarp]

From her own blog she takes the good Lords name in vain in a blog title post (and she uses the page url with the same) -

I wonder how Ron Paul feels about that? I ask you Paulnuts is it okay to take the Lords name in vain?

Probably like Bush would feel when Brett Scallions, lead singer for Fuel at a Bush sponsored concert for his inauguration, said "welcome to the greatest fu**ing country in the world."

Stop being silly.

[ex-snook]

Paul keeps getting smeared only because of this position on the Iraq war. All the other ‘reasons’ he has had for a long time without the guns of the pro-war crowd blazing away at him. In case no one has noticed, anyone against the Iraq war on this site is more than disagreed with, his name must be utterly destroyed.

[jrooney]

Using the F word is not comparable to taking the good Lords name in vain, which is one of the ten commandments. One is a sin, the other is not but is classless. Logic like that will surely bring christian voters flocking to Paul, not.

[DreamsofPolycarp]

That indicates complacency or ineptness, not conspiracy.

Government is too stupid, inept and incompetent to ever pull off a good conspiracy.

On that we can agree.

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

Why don't you guys post some positive articles on your candidates?

George, idiots like jrooney like to come and urinate on someone else's parade. They believe in the quasi-socialist status quo because they don't want their sacred cows to be gored under Paul.

As the primary season approaches, you can expect the hyperventilating to escalate from folks who laughably call themselves conservative. It's obvious that Paul has a huge, if underground following of supporters, which will have an impact on whoever is the GOP nominee.

The GOP ignores these voters at their own peril, because if Paul doesn't win, they damn sure ain't going to go to the polls and vote for a Giuliani or Romney, and probably not for a Fred Thompson, although I hope so because Fred Thompson is somewhat the Senate version of Ron Paul.

[George W. Bush]

Because I do not feel the need to push a candidate on this forum. I will vote for anyone of them that wins the GOP nomination, except Paul.

Fine. Your choice. I won't vote for the leftwing mayor personally. We each have a GOP candidate we won't vote for.

Taking questions from youtube, boy that is real statesman like. Leave that to the democrats. What next you want the GOP candidate to take questions from the MTV crowd or maybe trekkies?

Fine. We'll grab all the under-thirty YouTubers since McStain and Tommy Thompson, the only other confirmed participants, won't have much of a chance with them.

And 2008 is the year they may finally vote in large numbers. We have a lot of them with us already. What Howard Dean came close to doing in 2004, we may succeed with in 2008.

[DreamsofPolycarp]

Using the F word is not comparable to taking the good Lords name in vain,

You mean like calling the constitution just a "god-d*mned piece of paper"? THAT kind of taking God's name in vain?

Just trying to get an appropriate scale of sin so I can know exactly how far to snatch my skirts back.

PS. you are still being silly, to try and attach some person's activity who is not even ENDORSED by a candidate with that candidate. It is the same old lame and unthinking gooberisms that surface here that go like this: "Well *I* met a Ron Paul supporter once and he was really weird. He believed in a trade center conspiracy...." and there they go, pumping that one working neural ganglion to the limit in a desperate attempt to draw some kind of connection to a weirdo and Ron Paul.

Surely you people are smarter than that?

[jmc813]

Because I do not feel the need to push a candidate on this forum.

Is it because you're a Rudy guy and embarrassed by it?

[jrooney]

That was never proven and you know that. That was reported as being said but GW never put that in print like this woman or was it captured on camera, right? You do not know it occurred anymore than I do. Considering GW is the most christain living POTUS we have had in a long time, I highly doubt it occurred.

[George W. Bush]

No one in the top tier candidates makes any sense. RP is the only one with the intestinal fortitude to speak his mind.

Voted for Reagan, worked on both GH, and GW campaigns. Having wrote this, it is the basis of a campaign to muster up and motivate the voters to vote. Any of the campaign camps will take the kooks, moonbats and any other silly name given to them vote.

The Paul-haters can never seem to tell us why it's so awful to support the old Reagan-Gingrich agenda. Maybe they're all just government parasites of some kind. (And we know at least a few of them actually are.) LOL.

You know, I wish the entire GOP field would move to those Reagan-Gingrich smaller-government/liberty positions along with Ron Paul. The reason they are doing so badly in the polls is because they want to be big-government, nanny-state, global police, "conservatives". The last time that worked (and poorly at that) was in the Ford era before Reagan slew the Rockefeller establishment's power. And today, only Ron Paul carries that old Reagan banner. Ron Paul isn't Ronald Reagan. But he's certainly loyal to those ideals that brought us two landslides and control of Congress in the Nineties.

[jrooney]

Actually I am leaning towards Thompson if he joins or Romney. If Rudy wins the nomination, I will gladly vote for him over Hillary. Paul will never get my vote. Surrendering to al Qaeda is not and never will be an option.

[George W. Bush]

George, idiots like jrooney like to come and urinate on someone else's parade. They believe in the quasi-socialist status quo because they don't want their sacred cows to be gored under Paul.

Some of them are obviously just haters and focus on tearing down people for personal enjoyment, probably because they're some kind of losers. Others are undoubtedly supporters of the leftwing mayor, probably WA operatives. At least a few others are some kind of government parasite who would naturally fear a small-government conservative. And a few more are focused on foreign aid packages and since Ron Paul opposes all foreign aid, they hate him and will do anything to tear him down.

But they're not idiots. Some of them are clever. We should try to keep the high ground and not return fire like calling them idiots. The truth is winning here at FR as people start to look past the lies and the bombthrowers. And they're being attracted, like any conservatives will be, to the Reagan-Gingrich agenda that Ron Paul has always stood for.

Try not to let them provoke you. You know, we'll probably have to start a prayer thread and a suicide watch for them if Ron Paul pulls an upset victory at the Ames straw poll. LOL.