Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton's SUPPRESSED Thesis finally on line in its entirety
gopublius.com ^ | May 2, 1969 | Hillary Clinton

Posted on 08/01/2007 11:30:59 AM PDT by AndrewWalden

A PDF copy of Hillary Rodham’s senior thesis at Wellesley arrived in our inbox this morning. it is titled:

“There is only one fight …” an analysis of the Alinsky Model

Although I have no ‘loving wife’ to thank for keeping the children away while I wrote, I do have many friends and teachers who have contributed to the process of thesis-writing.

We have not had a chance to review and will do so today. Regardless, we wanted to post this as soon as possible to share with everyone. Hillary is running for President and it is important to know what she really believes. This document was hidden from public view during her husband’s presidency -= an apparent favor to the Clintons fromt he President of the university - and interest in it fell when the Clintons left office. Now with Hillary a top Democratic candidate for President the importance of this document has frothed to the surface again....

(Excerpt) Read more at gopublius.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; alinsky; clinton; clinton2008; clintonmanifesto; democrats; election; electionpresident; elections; hillary; hillaryclinton; hillaryrodham; hillarysthesis; starkravingsocialist; thesis; wellesley
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-246 next last
To: Our man in washington
She can't speak without lying...

A lifelong Yankees fan... from the suburbs of Chicago?

Named after Edmund Hillary, but born five years before he climbed Everest?

A Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy which later had its allegations proven, and no apology ever ....

And on and on....

51 posted on 08/01/2007 12:17:36 PM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: AndrewWalden

She gave us the rope, now let’s hang her with it.


52 posted on 08/01/2007 12:18:55 PM PDT by stm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndrewWalden
WOW! check out this quote....

Although there is great disagreement among writers about the definition of "radical" and among radicals themselves over the scope of the word's meaning, there is sufficient agreement to permit a general definition. A Radical is one who advocates sweeping changes in existing laws and methods of government. These proposed changes are aimed at the roots of political problems which in Marxian terms are the attitudes and behaviors of men. - page 10 of the thesis pdf file.

Hillary casually referred to the "Marxian terms" as a further explainer of the definition. I wonder how many more references to Marx are in this?

53 posted on 08/01/2007 12:19:09 PM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndrewWalden

Downloaded. Thanks for the info and link


54 posted on 08/01/2007 12:19:15 PM PDT by Diver Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Well it would take less space if she had used a proportional font.


55 posted on 08/01/2007 12:21:20 PM PDT by Ender Wiggin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Our man in washington
I haven’t looked at this document yet, but if anyone has, where do you see that her ideas have changed? Wasn’t her “socialized medicine” debacle proof that she’s right on schedule?
56 posted on 08/01/2007 12:22:20 PM PDT by ishabibble (ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Our man in washington
I haven’t looked at this document yet, but if anyone has, where do you see that her ideas have changed? Wasn’t her “socialized medicine” debacle proof that she’s right on schedule?
57 posted on 08/01/2007 12:22:42 PM PDT by ishabibble (ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: AndrewWalden

Hasn’t she just recently proposed some sort of courses in how to Train people?


58 posted on 08/01/2007 12:26:21 PM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndrewWalden

Hasn’t she just recently proposed some sort of courses in how to Train people?


59 posted on 08/01/2007 12:26:30 PM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
“To induce conflict is a risk because there is no guarantee that it will remain controllable.”

I haven't been able to get through ("server busy") but I'd like to know the context of this. I assume she was endorsing the practicing of inducing conflict despite this risk, since it was a risk that was necessary to achieiving the objective. Which is why we initiated military action in Iraq (which, to Hillary's credit, she voted in favor of, notwithstanding all the excuses and backtracking she's done since then).

60 posted on 08/01/2007 12:27:47 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

Her writing style is very reminiscent of Karl Marx.


61 posted on 08/01/2007 12:30:22 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

I wouldn’t get to excited about this. The public wants to move on from the “Bubba” years, I can’t imagine writings from 40 years ago are going to be proved important.

Cripes, twenty years ago I was planted next to a keg.


62 posted on 08/01/2007 12:31:32 PM PDT by teddyballgame (red man in a blue state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: AndrewWalden

ping


63 posted on 08/01/2007 12:32:58 PM PDT by lmailbvmbipfwedu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndrewWalden

ping!


64 posted on 08/01/2007 12:32:59 PM PDT by Juana la Loca
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndrewWalden

ping


65 posted on 08/01/2007 12:33:08 PM PDT by lmailbvmbipfwedu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndrewWalden

I’ve emailed this thread to my personal address list and asked everyone to do the same. I also emailed it to Rush and Roger Hedgecock.


66 posted on 08/01/2007 12:33:31 PM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Our man in washington
hildebeast marxist quotes!

June 2004

“WE are going to have to TAKE things away from you on behalf of the COMMON GOOD”.

February 2007

“I have proposed a plan to take those Oil Company profits and invest them into clean sources of renewable energy”.

This b!tch is a commie rat... a stalinist devotee... and scumbag socialist... and you take up for her?

LLS

67 posted on 08/01/2007 12:34:46 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Ender Wiggin

What I want to know...WHY NOW and who released it? Whoever did, they better head for the mountains!


68 posted on 08/01/2007 12:38:21 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: laweeks
Can they be silent forever?

When you're dead, you're dead a long time, like forever. Those who know also know the truth of this.

Nothing will ever come out, at least not enough to keep Hillary! out of the WH. Even if something started erupting, the Clintons would slap it down and then depend (reliably so) on the media to bury it down the memory hole. That was the model for the first Clinton Administration. I see no reason why a second would be any different.

69 posted on 08/01/2007 12:40:05 PM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

My prediction:

This makes its way around the talking head circuits. It feeds the moonbat base and then it quickly falls off the radar. No October surprise, base fed and rabid and this time next year, it is a completely dead issue. Anyone who brings it up next year is portrayed as a VRWC member who is out to "attack" Hillary again and they should "dump this dead issue".

This was "put out there" on purpose.

70 posted on 08/01/2007 12:44:06 PM PDT by Michael Barnes (If Rudy is the GOP's guy, I'm voting for Hillary. Hey, why do anything half ass?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: AndrewWalden

bookmark


71 posted on 08/01/2007 12:44:19 PM PDT by Getsmart64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Our man in washington
How does a girl from the Chicago suburbs become a Yankee fan?

I highly doubt that Mrs. Clinton was ever a fan of the Yankees. Like you, I suspect her supposed fandom is merely a product of polls.

But, for what it is worth, the biggest Yankees fan I ever met was raised in a rural area a long, long way from New York City. I remember watching a number of games with him back in the glory days of Thurman Munson.

72 posted on 08/01/2007 12:44:45 PM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: AndrewWalden

This is dangerous stuff.

Even more so if you read it. We know what happens to the Klintoons’ enemies.


73 posted on 08/01/2007 12:46:33 PM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndrewWalden
From Chapter Five...

Alinsky has proposed a TVA/Conservation Corps like project to "end poverty" and "help the environment". Hillary then comments:

Alinsky's proposals carry obvious spin-off effects. The need for workers could be filled from among the un- and under-employed in the cities. The model integrated communities constructed to house the workers would be self-governing. The projects, administered by bureaucrats and staffed by credetentialed experts, would provide attractive recompense and job satisfaction to lure people away from the megalopoli.

Credentialed elitists running make-work programs in "model" communities... Yup. Sounds like Hillary.

74 posted on 08/01/2007 12:50:26 PM PDT by Philistone (Your existence as a non-believer offends the Prophet(MPBUH).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndrewWalden

I’ve only started skimming it, but the tone (Marxist revolutionary wannabe) suggests this is potential dynamite to her campaign. I can see why it was suppressed for so long


75 posted on 08/01/2007 12:51:22 PM PDT by PapaBear3625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AndrewWalden

What is more troubling than the fact that she WROTE this trip, is the soon to be proven theory that, after nearly a century of government school indoctrination, the American sheeple just may be primed to accept it.


76 posted on 08/01/2007 12:51:35 PM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
Well, you know, I wrote a ton of stuff in college that was pretty crazy.

Me too. I wanted to be a "store front" lawyer for the poor and ACLU.

There is a difference - we can see that hillary has been faithfully executing her plan for 38 years..

77 posted on 08/01/2007 12:52:36 PM PDT by Wil H (So just what IS the Globe's optimum temperature?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AndrewWalden

Thanks for the link, If I feel like puking some day, I’ll read it.


78 posted on 08/01/2007 12:55:30 PM PDT by Doomonyou (Let them eat lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndrewWalden

Thanks!


79 posted on 08/01/2007 12:56:20 PM PDT by F-117A (Mr. Bush, have someone read UN Resolution 1244 to you!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

It appears to be a typed draft of the thesis. (actually typed rather than MS Word)


80 posted on 08/01/2007 12:56:35 PM PDT by PapaBear3625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: AndrewWalden

Hillary Clinton is the author of a thesis she wrote. She therefore should own the copyright.

As conservatives, do we think we have the right to steal her work and download it for free? Doesn’t she have the absolute right to her own intellectual property? If she wanted to sell it, wouldn’t that be her right to do so, and if she wants to prohibit people from publishing it, shouldn’t she, as the property owner, have an absolute right to do so?

Why are we conservatives so happy to abandon our property ownership principles when it helps us “get” the other side?


81 posted on 08/01/2007 12:57:14 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndrewWalden

Bump for later


82 posted on 08/01/2007 12:57:42 PM PDT by Tenacious 1 (No to nitwit jesters with a predisposition of self importance and unqualified political opinions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndrewWalden

“Europe is Europe is Europe”

When hClinton was doing her book tour in Europe in June 2003, she did an interview with Spiegel and made some strong socialistic comments. Most of her comments seemed to have been bypassed by the US MSM.

The PDF of that interview with a rough online translation from German to English is at this url:

http://tinyurl.com/2k2rzy


83 posted on 08/01/2007 12:58:35 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
This b!tch is a commie rat... a stalinist devotee... and scumbag socialist... and you take up for her?

Where did I say that I did?

84 posted on 08/01/2007 12:58:47 PM PDT by Our man in washington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: laweeks

Sure, they’re dead. Dead men tell no tales. (or wear plaid)


85 posted on 08/01/2007 1:03:35 PM PDT by Ro_Thunder ("Other than ending SLAVERY, FASCISM, NAZISM and COMMUNISM, war has never solved anything")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

mark


86 posted on 08/01/2007 1:08:04 PM PDT by eureka! (Is power so important to the Democrats that they are willing to endanger our country? Yep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Our man in washington
How does a girl from the Chicago suburbs become a Yankee fan? A favorite uncle from Manhattan who took her to games? She thought Mantle was cute? But she never had a story. All she had was the poll-driven claim that she was always a Yankee fan.

Of course it is poll driven, as is locality.

Now when she goes to campaign in Chicago, I'm sure she'll say she's always been a Cubs fan, and would really like to see them make it to the Super Bowl.

87 posted on 08/01/2007 1:10:57 PM PDT by AFreeBird (Will NOT vote for Rudy. <--- notice the period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: teddyballgame

You’re not running for POTUS, she is.


88 posted on 08/01/2007 1:12:07 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander
I highly doubt that Mrs. Clinton was ever a fan of the Yankees. Like you, I suspect her supposed fandom is merely a product of polls.

But, for what it is worth, the biggest Yankees fan I ever met was raised in a rural area a long, long way from New York City. I remember watching a number of games with him back in the glory days of Thurman Munson.

I've known a few folks like that. I knew a huge Red Sox fan named Mike who lived all his life in Philadelphia. The reason he liked the Sox was that his dad was a Ted Williams fan, and it just passed down through the family.

The difference between Mike and Hillary is Mike had a believable story about how he became a Red Sox fan.

89 posted on 08/01/2007 1:13:03 PM PDT by Our man in washington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: AndrewWalden

Holy Moses. I’m only on page 10, but already, I’m having trouble seeing how the woman who wrote this graduated from Wellesley.


90 posted on 08/01/2007 1:13:48 PM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

Is that “Train” as in boxcars with leg shackles?


91 posted on 08/01/2007 1:17:26 PM PDT by Little Pig (Is it time for "Cowboys and Muslims" yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: AndrewWalden

Neat. Now I’ve got some light reading for tonight.


92 posted on 08/01/2007 1:17:57 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (Dems '08 choices are a Manly woman, a Womanly man, or an naive Senator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndrewWalden

It shows that she is a communist. No surprise there. Please obtain a copy for yourself, since the slimeslingers will try to outlaw it.


93 posted on 08/01/2007 1:20:34 PM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Copyrights expire after, I believe, 17 years. This lousy piece of writing is in the public domain.


94 posted on 08/01/2007 1:21:58 PM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: AndrewWalden

i love the part on page 47 where she details how she would end american imperialism in the middle east to prevent the rise of an extremist terrorist organization bent on destroying innocent americans by flying hijacked planes into buildings.

wow, she is the smartest woman ever...

jk

teeman


95 posted on 08/01/2007 1:23:09 PM PDT by teeman8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndrewWalden

Ping for later


96 posted on 08/01/2007 1:25:23 PM PDT by Alex Murphy (As heard on the Amish Radio Network! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1675029/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndrewWalden

Let’s see...

It’s been a couple of hours, Hillary should announcing the whole thing is ‘old news’ any moment now.


97 posted on 08/01/2007 1:28:42 PM PDT by ArmstedFragg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leftism is Mentally Deranged; CharlesWayneCT
I think you're thinking of patents expiring after 17 years.

Written and artistic works are a different matter.

Never the less, she did publish this work as a thesis. Is not a thesis open for examination? Sure the university held it during Bubba's term, but it is out in the wild now, and it is not being used to "make money" by publishing some elses work as your own (like any sane person would claim this tripe as their own). Furthermore, I would consider such a paper to be insightful into the mind of one who would be president.

So Charles, consider the paper's dissemination on the net as a public service and "fair use".

98 posted on 08/01/2007 1:31:09 PM PDT by AFreeBird (Will NOT vote for Rudy. <--- notice the period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Ender Wiggin

Our own BKO is whom you mention. She didn’t believe what she saw was complete and unedited, and given the Wellsley complicity with leftist liberalism and the clintons, don’t be surprised if the released version is a redacted remanufacture sanitized for the Rodham-rodent’s benefit.


99 posted on 08/01/2007 1:35:00 PM PDT by MHGinTN (You've had life support. Promote life support for those in the womb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AndrewWalden

Thanks very much for the post/link.


100 posted on 08/01/2007 1:35:27 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-246 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson