This is NOT a hoax in my opinion....what do you guys think?Overall, I don't find it compelling. This looks like the imagination of a small-time computer programmer at work:
First of all, you wouldn't open up their hardware to find a CPU here, and a data bus there, and some kind of memory over there. Their hardware appeared to be perfectly solid and consistent in terms of material from one side to the other. Like a rock or a hunk of metal. But upon [much] closer inspection, we began to learn that it was actually one big holographic computational substrate - each "computational element" (essentially individual particles) can function independently, but are designed to function together in tremendously large clusters. I say its holographic because you can divide it up into the smallest chunks you want and still find a scaled-down but complete representation of the whole system. They produce a nonlinear computational output when grouped. So 4 elements working together is actually more than 4 times more powerful than 1... The language is actually a "functional blueprint". The forms of the shapes, symbols and arrangements thereof is itself functional. What makes it all especially difficult to grasp is that every element of each "diagram" is dependant on and related to every other element, which means no single detail can be created, removed or modified independently.The photos appear to be ridiculous fakes, and I've not seen anything to alter that conclusion. And I'm generally open to the idea of ETs, UFOs, etc.
“Figure 14.13 Rotary junction with orbital sub-junction connecting to an octal switch.”
Octal is base 8, which is four bit computing, which preceded 8-bit ($00-$FF) and 16-bit, and 32-bit, and 64-bit... Helluva sophisticated alien technology he’s got there.
I agree they were made with enormous effort in a well-funded shop. The author did not write the material in the scans. That said, WHY would anyone BOTHER???
There is something indefinable in the story I find quite discomforting, but I do not know anywhere near enough about n-dimensional fractal geometry to intelligently speculate on it. The Goedlerization of nearly infinite data within the complexity of a set is reasonable.
This was not written by a Journalist.
But WHY did someone bother..Where is the profit motive, or even the Fame Factor? No one, absolutely no one, would believe it even if it were true.