Skip to comments.CNN Program on Fuel Tank explosions - MORE PROPAGANDA TO CEMENT THE REASON TWA 800 CRASHED
Posted on 08/05/2007 12:03:42 PM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
Called "No Survivors"
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
Clintons must be getting the guilts. They won't stop pushing this crapola out there - maybe putting the airlines out of business all because Bill Clinton somehow allowed one of our passenger jets to be shot down in 1986. Sorry story just ended. Did anybody else see it?
forced not fored
What did bill Clinton have to do with 1986?
1996 not 1986.
Sorry wrong decade - 1996.
Thanks - yes - again. I think the Airlines are going to win this one over the Clinton criminals.....they know bs when they see it.
Yes indeed. But they won’t stop through their propaganda arms to push the center fuel tank “explosion” lie. The CNN Program went back to some plane designers mid 1900’s who saw this potential problem and warned of it. Somebody has come up with technology that pumps nitrogen into the center fuel tank or something such as that.....sorry was typing so fast wasn’t able to hear all the garbage. That poor guy whose sister died is being used by the Clinton proxy liars. I hope one day he gets true justice for his sister’s death.
I was a freekin AA missle...
It was definitely a missile and no fuel tank created explosion. You think Anti aircraft? Whose Anti-Aircraft missile? I just can’t decide if it was the Russkies, or the Chicoms.....getting in a “lucky” shot. God knows. Bill and Hillary Clinton know. That guilt is buried under all their bravado and all their lies and all their power grabbing freedom destroying intentions. I hope it makes them not sleep well and have to take drugs and pills for peace of mind - which never ever comes. Bill Clinton looks like the guilt is still eating him up inside. Hillary Clinton on the other hand is so cold to the pangs of guilt, I believe she could care less. It’s over, done, and let it go. Old news. But they just can’t let it go. They keep running these propaganda pieces hoping people who are mindnumbed are not paying attention and hoping to rewrite history for the younguns who weren’t paying attention in 1996 to these events. It won’t work, Clintonista traitorous thugs.
Exactly. And how many jets have been falling out of the sky because of the center fuel tank problem since 1996?
Not just CNN, the History Channel, in the BoneYard series, makes the same “fuel tank go boom” claim. They also noted the FedGov spend more money on the TWA Flt 800 investigation than any other to date - 40+ Million.
Me? I think it was hit by a metorite or space junk.
Space junk or a meteorite - interesting theories. But it was a missile. No other explanation matches up with the events of the day.
You have no proof of any missile hitting the plane.
I dislike the Clintons just as much as you do, but you don’t do anybody any favors by sounding like a conspiracy wacko.
If you believe a missile hit plane, back it up with scientific proof.
A statistical study of a recently released FBI database of 736 witness interview summaries refutes the NTSB’s conclusion. Most significantly, eighty-six percent of the witnesses who described the motion and/or origin of the rising streak reject the NTSB’s explanation. These witnesses observed the streak emanate from the surface when Flight 800 was 2.6 miles (approximately 4 km) above it. Others reported seeing the streak moving along a different trajectory from that of Flight 800 and/or seeing the streak collide with Flight 800 (see “FIRO Witness Statistics” on page 8). The remaining fourteen percent offer no information concerning the streak’s origin.
Rather than openly address these observations, both the FBI and NTSB on various occasions suppressed the witness evidence:
1) The FBI withheld the accounts of 278 witnesses from the NTSB for more than one year after the crash. All witness accounts with descriptions of a “streak” colliding with an aircraft were concealed from the NTSB in this withheld data.[3, 4]
2) The FBI ostensibly lost the results of a study to determine the origin of an alleged surface-launched object seen before the crash. Those results are officially listed as “unable to locate” by the FBI.
3) At the first public hearing on the crash, the FBI prevailed upon the NTSB to prohibit any discussion of the witness evidence.
4) Official witness sketches that purport to show a surface-launched object cause the crash have never been discussed or addressed in any official report or public hearing on the crash.
5) The witness evidence was withheld from the public until April 2000, almost four years after the crash.
6) At the final public hearing on the crash in August 2000, the NTSB dramatically under-reported the number of witness accounts that conflicted with their proposed crash scenario.
The proof is over 200 eyewitnesses who saw the “streak of light” rise up from the horizon and then the plane exploded. Give us a chance to prove it. Where is the body of the plane now, the wreckage? Give some unbiased experts access to it and let’s see what this part of the evidence shows. Who do you think controls access to that wreckage if it hasn’t been buried or dropped into the middle of the ocean by now? It isn’t the private sector.
Thank you! Excellent summary. Despite the multi millions spent to perpetrate the Clinton administrations convoluted and totally false explanation for the demise of flight TWA800 - it is good to read that those eyewitnesses, most of them, refuse to swallow such garbage. OH but they are all just stubborn conspiracy theorist wackos.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.