Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NH: Vid of my latest open carry incident
NHfree.com ^

Posted on 08/06/2007 5:45:15 PM PDT by Dada Orwell

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-169 next last
To: mvpel

Was Mr SS a friend of yours?


101 posted on 08/07/2007 7:18:06 AM PDT by tiger-one (The night has a thousand eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: tiger-one
I also suspect the guy carrying walks around outside the meeting location, on the days of their meetings until he is spotted by LE, then makes the call.

I can tell you from personal knowledge that this is the first time this sort of thing has happened outside the meeting. I would have been there myself, carrying openly, with my wife and son, if it hadn't been for the electrical wiring I had to get done on Saturday.

102 posted on 08/07/2007 7:18:23 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Dada Orwell
I was walking 50 yards from my car to the monthly Free Stater meeting at Murphy's Taproom

Here in GA open carry is legal if you have a CC permit, but taking a gun concealed or open into a taproom where alcohol is served would get you arrested and your CCW invalidated. Carrying openly would probably get you arrested anyway in the Atlanta metro area, and it would probably require hiring a lawyer to get you off the hook.

We badly need a overhaul of our CCW law here, but so far we haven't been able to make much headway of that front even though we now have a Republican majority State Assembly and governor that was supposed to be on our side of the issue.

103 posted on 08/07/2007 7:18:28 AM PDT by epow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tiger-one
The camcorder, in NH use of recording devices of an individual or individuals, in an area where one would expect not to be recorded, is illegal unless permission is given by the subjects being recorded. Walking down the street with 3 of your friends, and someone comes up to you with a CC 5 feet away and begins recording you is a crime

I strongly doubt that this is true -- but if it is, it is one of the most abominably evil laws I've ever heard.

104 posted on 08/07/2007 7:18:29 AM PDT by Sloth (You being wrong & me being closed-minded are not the same thing, nor are they mutually exclusive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: tiger-one

I’ve known him for a number of years - I’d say we’re more acquaintances, we don’t see each other much as he lives in Keene. He and I are in polar disagreement on certain core principles, like the use of defensive deadly force, so we each think the other’s a bit off our nut. He’s a really kind and friendly fellow most of the time - apparently except when faced with cops abusing their authority.

I don’t understand why some folks here would like to see a cop even further abuse that authority by attacking him and doing him grave bodily harm just because he’s not groveling at the sight of their shiny badges.


105 posted on 08/07/2007 7:26:37 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: epow
Here in GA open carry is legal if you have a CC permit, but taking a gun concealed or open into a taproom where alcohol is served would get you arrested and your CCW invalidated. Carrying openly would probably get you arrested anyway in the Atlanta metro area, and it would probably require hiring a lawyer to get you off the hook.

Friends of ours are planning to move to New Hampshire from Atlanta for just that reason, among others.

In New Hampshire, it's never been illegal to carry in a bar, and our decades of experience on that point puts the lie to the notion that seems to prevail everywhere else in the country that such violation of rights is "common sense."

106 posted on 08/07/2007 7:28:11 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
I strongly doubt that this is true -- but if it is, it is one of the most abominably evil laws I've ever heard.

We tried to fix it last session with a law that would clarify that a police officer in the performance of his duties has no expectation of privacy anywhere or at any time, except in the head or some such. The Democrats killed it, though.

107 posted on 08/07/2007 7:29:24 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
I don’t understand why some folks here would like to see a cop even further abuse that authority by attacking him and doing him grave bodily harm just because he’s not groveling at the sight of their shiny badges.

By him, do you mean the guy in the striped shirt? Based on what I saw in that video, it's difficult to have any sympathy for him because it seemed as though he was doing everything he possibly could to escalate the situation into something that it wasn't.

108 posted on 08/07/2007 7:34:46 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost
By him, do you mean the guy in the striped shirt? Based on what I saw in that video, it's difficult to have any sympathy for him because it seemed as though he was doing everything he possibly could to escalate the situation into something that it wasn't.

It was the cops who started the situation, and the cops who could have ended the situation at any time by tipping their hats and going about their business, seeing as how no crime had been, was being, or was about to be committed, except by them under 18 USC 242.

109 posted on 08/07/2007 7:42:59 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Copernicus
People DIE when they do not defend their liberties.

In a democracy, people lose their liberties when they irritate people or scare them. Open carry does both.

110 posted on 08/07/2007 7:52:15 AM PDT by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
It was the cops who started the situation, and the cops who could have ended the situation at any time by tipping their hats and going about their business, seeing as how no crime had been, was being, or was about to be committed, except by them under 18 USC 242.

Actually, that's exactly what the cops did---Striped Shirt Guy was the one who desperately wanted to escalate this minor thing into a "situation." The cops handled this situation well. Generally, I don't often side with the cops, but I have to give them credit here. Once they understood what was going down, they backed off accordingly. Manchester's not exactly the safest place in the world, so I can understand why they might look twice at a person packing heat.

111 posted on 08/07/2007 7:52:28 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
So "real world politics" in your state might be a bit different than the "real world politics" here in New Hampshire.

People are people all over. If you irritate or scare enough of them they will do whatever it takes to end their fears.

Besides that fact, the political climate in NH is changing with the liberals moving up from Boston. They're looking for a nice quiet, safe, happy place live in and retire to. Poking them with a stick by carrying in the open might be an entertaining thing to do. But like poking a rattle snake here in AZ, it does no positive good and will eventually get you bit.

112 posted on 08/07/2007 7:58:32 AM PDT by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Dada Orwell
Thanks for your efforts! It is only small ‘events’ like that that can educate and get the word out. I am saddened that so many even here on FR think it is better to not exercises your rights for fear that the cop might have an ‘accident’ (what are they puppies?). I agree that the stripped shirt guy was pushing it too far but not that much. He did not raise is voice much at all and was not aggressive. I got the feeling if the cops had warned him he would have backed off. Still talking maybe but given them space. I think it was a benefit to have someone there expressing righteous outrage but in a reasonably calm way and NOT focused or aggressive. He did not touch the cops or even get in what you could call their 'personal space'. His actions were pushing the line but the entire stop was over the line by the cops. His expressing shock and disbelief at the cops actions put things in a pretty clear context. He did not strike me as irrational of drugged (as some expressed). Dang it, we should not have to treat cops like they are bombs that might go off if we look at them funny!!! What happened to protect and serve?

It is important for us to assert our rights, not just in court for fear of jail but on the street despite fear of aggressive authority.
113 posted on 08/07/2007 7:59:29 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dada Orwell
with regard to russell, the angry supporter....there is a reason why he gets testy with manchester PD. they locked him up and dragged his wife into a paddy wagon once for peaceably demonstrating outside a “free speech zone.”

Well that would explain why he got a bit testy...For that very reason, then, Russell's friends need to keep him out of those scenarios, or one day they will escalate. That anger he's carrying around will eventually get him or someone else in trouble.

OTOH you maintained your cool and handled the situation properly. Well done.

114 posted on 08/07/2007 8:02:14 AM PDT by opus86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
This is the fellow that, according to the T-shirt of the protestor/demonstrator in the video, should be "freed" in New Hampshire.

If I was a gambling man I would bet money that the guy in the photo is a former MA resident who moved to NH and brought his left wing MA mindset with him.

I have a good friend and former neighbor from NH. He's a tough old WWII combat vet who would probably chase that guy in the hat all the way back to Boston if he still lived up there.

115 posted on 08/07/2007 8:08:11 AM PDT by epow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

Read these NH statutes.

http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LVIII/570-A/570-A-1.htm

http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/RSA/html/LVIII/570-A/570-A-2.htm


116 posted on 08/07/2007 8:13:54 AM PDT by tiger-one (The night has a thousand eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: mvpel

Where I saw Mr. SS become dangerous to the situation was when he jumped in front of the MPD Off. A little more than groveling. He does not help your message.

Have you ever heard of ATTY Penny Dean?


117 posted on 08/07/2007 8:17:43 AM PDT by tiger-one (The night has a thousand eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: opus86

Yep, Mr. SS is ready for a repeat tour in the slammer


118 posted on 08/07/2007 8:20:15 AM PDT by tiger-one (The night has a thousand eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: tiger-one
"Oral communication'' means any oral communication uttered by a person exhibiting an expectation that such communication is not subject to interception under circumstances justifying such expectation.

Obviously, no justifiable expectation that the communication would go unrecorded could exist when someone is openly employing a camcorder, so the statute forbidding the interception of oral communication is inapplicable to this situation.

119 posted on 08/07/2007 8:26:35 AM PDT by Sloth (You being wrong & me being closed-minded are not the same thing, nor are they mutually exclusive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: narby
Poking them with a stick by carrying in the open might be an entertaining thing to do. But like poking a rattle snake here in AZ, it does no positive good and will eventually get you bit.

But pretending that there are no rattlesnakes gets you bit too, as was the case in Ohio where the right to armed self-defense in the Constitution languished unused for decades. And when you finally do wind up stepping too close to the rattlesnake, without even a stick in your hand, and then complain about getting bit, people line up behind the rattlesnakes and say they should have snapped your elbow too, for good measure.

Only a mentally-ill person would be put into a state of mortal dread seeing someone walking down the street, minding his or her own business, with a holstered sidearm. And the accepted way to deal with the illness of phobia or anxiety disorders in the psychological community is through acclimation.

It's not about "entertainment," it's about a vital struggle for the preservation of the fundamental human right to armed self-defense, which as you know is under siege from every direction around the nation, including from police officers who swear an oath to uphold the Constitution.

120 posted on 08/07/2007 8:27:34 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: tiger-one
Yep, I'm in touch with her just about every day on Gun Owners of New Hampshire business. She got stopped while walking down the street in Concord, by another ignorant, arrogant, self-righteous state police trooper.

Here's a YouTube video of his son attempting to chew her out about it.

121 posted on 08/07/2007 8:33:08 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: narby
In a democracy, people lose their liberties when they irritate people or scare them. Open carry does both.

ANYWHERE people lose liberties when they are too scared to exercise them. Do you think open carry should not be legal because it scares people? If you think no one should do it how is that any different? The existence of the 2nd Amendment scares some people because they know their neighbors might have guns.
122 posted on 08/07/2007 8:34:29 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: epow
If I was a gambling man I would bet money that the guy in the photo is a former MA resident who moved to NH and brought his left wing MA mindset with him.

You don't have to be pro-war in order to support individual liberty.

123 posted on 08/07/2007 8:34:41 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: mvpel; epow; Dada Orwell

Mike is right. Here in NH you are allowed to carry inside any establishment serving alcohol, as long as the owners don’t have any rules against it and signs posted (I’ve never seen any). Because of this, I’d say that New Hampshire enjoys better gun laws than even Texas, where it’s posted ILLEGAL BY STATE LAW to carry into a bar.

Personally, I’m 27, and go to the pub several times a week to eat, have a pint, meet friends, etc. I carry daily, everwhere I go, including into every bar or pub I frequent. The only difference between Dave Ridley and Mike and myself is that I CCW. Dave does most of the time except for when we are out together in groups. I agree with Dave that open carrying while among other polite, well-dressed, ordinary folks goes a long way towards demonstrating that open carry is really NO BIG DEAL.

Although, Mike... after seeing this video I might open carry more frequently just to see what happens.

Stay safe you two. See you guys soon!


124 posted on 08/07/2007 8:35:59 AM PDT by t_skoz ("let me be who I am - let me kick out the jams!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: mvpel

It’s true that there’s been incidents of black officers shot. Most often my friend would be in his car and the gun would be in the glove. There’d be some real interest along the lines of “hey, what do we have here” but of course then the paperwork would be produced.

And sometimes he’d be in the car with another guy who just happened to be a detective on the NYC force too.


125 posted on 08/07/2007 8:36:50 AM PDT by romanesq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: mvpel

More to the story than Dean or the papers wrote. it is in an area where you would probably not want to be at 0200.


126 posted on 08/07/2007 8:37:41 AM PDT by tiger-one (The night has a thousand eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: epow
If I was a gambling man I would bet money that the guy in the photo is a former MA resident who moved to NH and brought his left wing MA mindset with him.

War Is the Health of the State - by Randolph Bourne

With the shock of war, however, the State comes into its own again. The Government, with no mandate from the people, without consultation of the people, conducts all the negotiations, the backing and filling, the menaces and explanations, which slowly bring it into collision with some other Government, and gently and irresistibly slides the country into war. For the benefit of proud and haughty citizens, it is fortified with a list of the intolerable insults which have been hurled toward us by the other nations; for the benefit of the liberal and beneficent, it has a convincing set of moral purposes which our going to war will achieve; for the ambitious and aggressive classes, it can gently whisper of a bigger role in the destiny of the world. The result is that, even in those countries where the business of declaring war is theoretically in the hands of representatives of the people, no legislature has ever been known to decline the request of an Executive, which has conducted all foreign affairs in utter privacy and irresponsibility, that it order the nation into battle.

While I have often disputed and argued with Russell and others about the character and nature of the liberation of Iraq and the important role that the US military in bringing it about, and the long-term benefit it will bring to the world, I have never felt that their position is utterly devoid of merit. They just have different fundamental values than I, and weigh the balance of state-sponsored violence vs. state-sponsored tyranny differently than I do.

127 posted on 08/07/2007 8:42:36 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Dada Orwell
Just watched the video, very interesting and informative. The only thing I question that Dave did that I would question was refusing to show his CC permit. Can you do that in NH without breaking any law?

In GA we are required by law to show a cop our CC permit if we are carrying and if asked for it. The only time I have been stopped for a traffic offense I had my gun in the glove box. The cop didn't ask to see a permit because he didn't see the gun. But if he had seen the gun and he had asked to see my permit, I would have had to show the permit or else I probably would have been taken to the station house and booked for refusing his lawful request.

Just my HO, but it doesn't seem unreasonable to me that I should be required to show a CC permit since carrying either concealed or openly anywhere off of your own property without that permit is illegal in GA. Except that you can legally have a gun in your car if the gun is either visible or in the glove box or console. All in all, GA gun laws aren't nearly as harsh as many other state's laws, but IMHO no permit or license should be required by any state or local government in order to exercise a constitutionally protected right such as freedom of speech and the RKABA.

128 posted on 08/07/2007 8:42:55 AM PDT by epow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tiger-one
Yep, Mr. SS is ready for a repeat tour in the slammer

nothing he did would have warranted it. He did not actually impede the cops in any way. They did what they did and mostly ignored him. If they had warned him and he ignored it or if he had actually impeded them I would agree with you. He was pushing the line right to the limit which is arguably not bright, but he WAS within his rights. Had he been too noisy for the cops to carry on their little 'talk' or if he had gotten between the flanking cop and the 'suspect' then that would have been too far (waving the hand in front was really pushing his luck but not grounds for going to the slammer). Those that overstep their authority HAVE To be called on it or the go farther the next time.
129 posted on 08/07/2007 8:43:21 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: tiger-one
More to the story than Dean or the papers wrote. it is in an area where you would probably not want to be at 0200.

Why not? Why would you want her to cede her neighborhood to the criminal element regardless of the time of day? She works non-stop during the day, and doesn't sleep much, so why not go out for a walk at 0200? The night air is cool and brisk and refreshing.

What if the story is exactly as she says it is, and there really is an authoritarian rot lurking within the culture of the State Police?

130 posted on 08/07/2007 8:46:24 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: epow
Just watched the video, very interesting and informative. The only thing I question that Dave did that I would question was refusing to show his CC permit. Can you do that in NH without breaking any law?

Yes. No license is needed to carry a loaded firearm openly on one's person in New Hampshire. Indeed, it's not even legally required to identify yourself to a police officer if they don't have a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been, is being, or is about to be committed by you.

131 posted on 08/07/2007 8:50:22 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ
Those that overstep their authority HAVE To be called on it or the go farther the next time.

Agreed.

I realize that cops have a tough job at a usually sub-par wage, and that most of the people who they do serious business with are lowlife scumbuckets who are often released by bleeding heart judges and juries after endangering the lives of the cops who brought them in. But even so, it's not too much to ask of people who are given that much authority over their fellow citizens that they at least know what the laws are and how far they can go without overstepping their authority.

132 posted on 08/07/2007 9:09:29 AM PDT by epow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
I used to live in the People's Police State of Kalifornia too. I left for New Hampshire for just this sort of reason.

Well, I'm glad you found a way to get some excitement there in New Hampshire. Try marching around in front of some elementary schools openly...Might get exciting...Give you guys something to yuk it up about at the next meeting at "Murphy's Taproom".

133 posted on 08/07/2007 9:13:39 AM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

Why are you being a dick? Aren’t we on the same team here?


134 posted on 08/07/2007 9:17:30 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
Look, the author of this piece stated he does this to "educate the police" about the open carry rights.

So why even post this on the Internet? The cops know what the law is in this regard. This guy parading around with his sidearm, is like throwing down a piece of raw meat, and waiting for flies to land on it, with the results being kinda predictable.

If he was so concerned about "teaching the cops", why not go to the police stations and offer classes?

135 posted on 08/07/2007 9:27:24 AM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: epow

You don’t need a CCW permit to carry openly here in NH. Dave’s handgun is clearly visible, it is very clearly OPEN CARRY. No permit is necessary.

The only issue might be having to produce some kind of identification, even a library card or something (LOL!) to the officer, but I am willing to gamble that Dave knows more about those laws here in NH than I do.


136 posted on 08/07/2007 9:34:07 AM PDT by t_skoz ("let me be who I am - let me kick out the jams!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
Look, the author of this piece stated he does this to "educate the police" about the open carry rights. So why even post this on the Internet?

Because as this video makes the rounds of police scuttlebutt via e-mail, it'll wind up being a lot less expensive than driving from one end of the state to the other to walk police officers through the basic Constitutional rights they swore an oath to uphold.

If they knew the law in this regard, then they had no more reason to detain him than they'd have on seeing an old man driving lawfully down the road without his seatbelt on here in New Hampshire.

Do you think that cops should be able to pull anyone over for no reason other than to check and make sure they have a valid drivers license? That's what's going on here.

Besides, you have to find out where the flies are in order to swat them.

137 posted on 08/07/2007 9:34:52 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: mvpel; tiger-one

I work a day job, have consulting customers after hours, own my own record label, work on two political campaigns and still try to get out and have a social life. I work around the clock.

I routinely ride my bicycle at night in Manchester NH. For me, 2am isn’t “late”. It’s quiet, it’s cooler, there is no traffic in the city, and you can see headlights from several blocks away. I wouldn’t even THINK of leaving the house without a handgun, and when I ride my bike, I sometimes open carry.

Peaceful citizens have a right to live, work and travel anywhere the please, and they have a right to self-defense in those areas as well. When I first moved to NH I was poor because I had taken all my savings to move. I lived in the ghetto because that was all I could afford at the time. Most people in poor neighborhoods are just trying to do the best they can with what they have. Because they live in bad neighborhoods they are at significantly greater risk of being crime victims than those in the suburbs. Poor inner city people in Manchester have the same rights to travel freely and safely anywhere, at any time, as do people in the wealthiest suburbs in NH.


138 posted on 08/07/2007 9:45:17 AM PDT by t_skoz ("let me be who I am - let me kick out the jams!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
The cops know what the law is in this regard.

It is very clear WATCHING the video that the cops DON'T know what the law is in this regard. Or they don't think citizens do so they try to get away with more. Posting it on the internet also educates everyone. Police overstepping authority is a toe on the path that leads toward tyranny. Tyrant, even it is tiniest early stages, is combated by open disclosure of what is happening to the general populace. As someone who had carried openly before I found it very educational and information to know what kind of reaction I might get from cops, what rights I need to know about and how I can act to assert my rights while still keeping things low key and non-confrontational.
139 posted on 08/07/2007 9:47:34 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
Yes. No license is needed to carry a loaded firearm openly on one's person in New Hampshire.

CheezLouize, who wudda thunk that, and in the northeast to boot.

I know VT doesn't require a permit to carry concealed or openly, but I figured that NH was too close to MA for that. Seeing someone besides a cop carrying a gun would probably cause a MA Kennedyite to drop dead of cardiac arrest.

140 posted on 08/07/2007 10:21:23 AM PDT by epow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
While I have often disputed and argued with Russell and others about the character and nature of the liberation of Iraq and the important role that the US military in bringing it about, and the long-term benefit it will bring to the world, I have never felt that their position is utterly devoid of merit.

I didn't know that the guy holding the sign in that photo is one of the good guys in this story, I just assumed that he's some unidentified war protester who's on the other side of the gun carry issue as well as against the war in Iraq.

My bad, I'll try to pay attention to who's who on the thread from here on before posting again. I'm reading and posting to the thread during breaks from the menial jobs my wife assigned to me on this housecleaning day.

141 posted on 08/07/2007 10:36:32 AM PDT by epow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: epow

I don’t think that photo of him is from last Saturday.


142 posted on 08/07/2007 10:40:25 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ
It is very clear WATCHING the video that the cops DON'T know what the law is in this regard.

If they don't know the firearms laws in regards to carrying/transporting them, in their own state, well, they should not be involved in law enforcement.

Or they don't think citizens do so they try to get away with more.

I think you are closer with this point.

For the record I want to say, I personally feel all firearms laws should be eliminated, EXCEPT those directed at felons and the mentally ill. Many states have made an absolute mockery of the 2nd Amendment. In addition, I feel states and counties that deny law abiding citizens CCW permits should be held TOTALLY liable if those citizens become victims of crime.

143 posted on 08/07/2007 10:57:22 AM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Dada Orwell

Amazing. Great job remaining composed and respectfully refusing upon hearing “your papers please.”

And I do commend the officers involved for not escalating the situation as an example to those who would dare to assert their 2nd & 4th Amendment rights.


144 posted on 08/07/2007 11:10:38 AM PDT by Titan Magroyne ("Shorn, dumb and bleating is no way to go through life, son." Yeah, close enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dada Orwell

Placemarker to watch later.


145 posted on 08/07/2007 11:14:39 AM PDT by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
For the record I want to say, I personally feel all firearms laws should be eliminated, EXCEPT those directed at felons and the mentally ill.

If you add the word "violent" before "felons" I can get on board with that...

Ordinarily, passing a bad check in Ohio is a misdemeanor, but large checks or multiple checks within a six-month period aggregating to large amounts make it a 5th-, 4th-, or 3rd-class felony, depending on the amounts involved.[7]

And if a felon is violent enough that they can't be trusted with a gun, then the question becomes why they're not in prison.

146 posted on 08/07/2007 11:23:20 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
For the record I want to say, I personally feel all firearms laws should be eliminated, EXCEPT those directed at felons and the mentally ill.

I'll go farther than that. I don't believe that ANY laws against ANY class of people owning and carrying guns do any good at stopping crimes that involve guns. If a person who is not deterred by laws against murder, robbery, rape, etc, etc, which impose heavy penalties on the perpetrator, they certainly won't be deterred by a law against carrying a gun. Anyway, few criminals go to jail just for illegally carrying a gun, that's usually one of the first charges that gets bargained away by the prosecution in exchange for a confession, a plea bargain agreement, squealing on accomplices, info about the whereabouts of loot or bodies, etc.

IMHO allowing people to be legally armed at all times and places would do much more to cut crime rates than any gun law ever will. Combined with more severe penalties, including the death penalty for murder and for forcible rape of a minor, that would not be subject to parole or probation, I believe the violent crime rate would decline to somewhere near the rate for the late 19th century before many cities and states enacted draconian gun laws. Contrary to the film and TV industry's highly exaggerated portrayal of the "old west" era, it was for the most part a much safer and less violent era than today by far.

147 posted on 08/07/2007 11:46:14 AM PDT by epow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: epow
In re #147.

Before someone points out that some of the “old west” cow towns banned the carrying of guns in the city limits, I want to say that it was a much different situation in those towns than anywhere in the US today.

In towns where a gunslinging town marshall or sheriff, who btw was often a much worse criminal than the young cattle drovers he was hired to control, he often enforced that ban by either shooting down the offender if he put up a fight or brutally pistol whipping him into submission and then locking him up in a foul jail cell for the duration of his party’s stay in town.

If today's LEOs enforced gun laws that way there would probably be less crime now as well, but I doubt that any of us want to see that drastic solution to the problem.

148 posted on 08/07/2007 12:06:18 PM PDT by epow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Dada Orwell; FreedomPoster

I wasn’t impressed with the video. I don’t think we can assume that the police are brutally anti-freedom because they stop to ask questions of a guy carrying a gun, holstered or not, on the street.

Maybe they were less familiar with the laws about open carry in the state. But why pick a fight with them by not showing them your ID, explaining who you are, explaining why you carry, etc.? You’re just creating trouble for them and yourself, and what’s worse, stirring up hostilities between the police and handgun owners.

The police are on our side, unless we’re out to commit a crime. And they can’t read our minds to find out if we’re on their side. Maybe they could have been more friendly about it, but I think you could have been more cooperative too.

Walking around, railing about infringements of freedom, and causing a scene just because a cop asked about the weapon is the wrong kind of thing. In my humble opinion.


149 posted on 08/07/2007 1:00:53 PM PDT by DaveLoneRanger ("Being normal is not neccessarily a virtue. It rather denotes a lack of courage.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

Comment #150 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-169 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson